The NEW Tomb Raider Benchmark Thread

pgi947 · 12 Nov 2013 at 23:22

Kaapstad said:
Just found some old ones on imageshack

Some old ones of my Titans @981/1788
3930k @5.1
1080p

Two Titans

At some point I will try and break 270fps but at the moment it is a bit warm in my room.

Just wondering about this one Kaap, I thought the perf gap between a Titan and 780 was roughly 150mhz, how are you're Titans at 981 core hitting 142fps yet my two 780's at 1200mhz core are only hitting 123fps? Granted my memory was only at 1600 vs the 1788 of your titans but I wouldn't have thought that still adds to a 20fps gap?

Gregster · 13 Nov 2013 at 00:16

pgi947 said:
Just wondering about this one Kaap, I thought the perf gap between a Titan and 780 was roughly 150mhz, how are you're Titans at 981 core hitting 142fps yet my two 780's at 1200mhz core are only hitting 123fps? Granted my memory was only at 1600 vs the 1788 of your titans but I wouldn't have thought that still adds to a 20fps gap?

I think the gap is closer and is around 100Mhz Paul. I would assume that Kaaps are boosting to maybe 1050 or higher and the memory clocks do give a nice boost.

Kaapstad · 13 Nov 2013 at 00:47

pgi947 said:
Just wondering about this one Kaap, I thought the perf gap between a Titan and 780 was roughly 150mhz, how are you're Titans at 981 core hitting 142fps yet my two 780's at 1200mhz core are only hitting 123fps? Granted my memory was only at 1600 vs the 1788 of your titans but I wouldn't have thought that still adds to a 20fps gap?

The clocks I quote are the stock 837mhz for a Titan plus whatever I add in Precision X, in this case +144 to give a total of 981mhz. If you were to watch them running in GPUZ they would be boosting much higher to 1175 or 1188mhz. I don't believe in quoting these boost clocks as they are not consistent and would rather use the set clocks which are.

Kaapstad · 13 Nov 2013 at 01:10

pgi947 said:
Just wondering about this one Kaap, I thought the perf gap between a Titan and 780 was roughly 150mhz, how are you're Titans at 981 core hitting 142fps yet my two 780's at 1200mhz core are only hitting 123fps? Granted my memory was only at 1600 vs the 1788 of your titans but I wouldn't have thought that still adds to a 20fps gap?

Here is a run I just did on TR with the clocks set to 994/1788 to show the boost clocks. Normally I would not have any of this running as it effects the score a bit.

Kaapstad · 13 Nov 2013 at 01:32

Just ran this one off using the settings in the post above

4 Titans @994/1788
3930k @5.1
320.18 drivers
269.9fps.

1080p

Uncle Petey · 13 Nov 2013 at 03:28

Updated, I think...

There may be some errors or missing entries, but it's 3.27am and you guys are a right pain in the arse with the multiple submissions

Kaapstad · 13 Nov 2013 at 04:07

Uncle Petey said:
Updated, I think...

There may be some errors or missing entries, but it's 3.27am and you guys are a right pain in the arse with the multiple submissions

All my NVidia scores are using 320.18 drivers (the ones that kill GPUs)

pgi947 · 13 Nov 2013 at 06:28

Kaapstad said:
The clocks I quote are the stock 837mhz for a Titan plus whatever I add in Precision X, in this case +144 to give a total of 981mhz. If you were to watch them running in GPUZ they would be boosting much higher to 1175 or 1188mhz. I don't believe in quoting these boost clocks as they are not consistent and would rather use the set clocks which are.

Ahhh forgot you had boost on top of those clocks!

Was worried my 780's weren't performing as they should

Thermal choke cut off still 70c? I did notice my top card fluctuating in core speed the higher the temp went, pesky air coolers

Silent_Scone · 13 Nov 2013 at 08:50

Kaapstad said:
All my NVidia scores are using 320.18 drivers (the ones that kill GPUs)

You rebel lol.

Silent_Scone · 13 Nov 2013 at 16:51

Kaapstad said:
Have you tried any of the other overclocking software to see if they work any better than Precision X

Gregster said:
Widespread issue?

Sorry hadn't seen these (even though spoken about it in another thread

)

I tried GPU Tweak Kaap, same result. Throttles the coreV down to stock or near abouts. Hovers over 1.50/1.72 occasionally but rarely ever 1.2v. Think judging by what other users are saying (and merry old GTX owners) it's hitting the power limit quickly. Which for me is really f'ing irritating as my superclocked cards aren't as good as some are getting on the core front. I'm not really a massive fan of GPU flashing either as it's always eventually ended up leaving me with a hole in my foot.

Venares · 13 Nov 2013 at 21:24

Well apparently my cards memory still had a lot to give

EVGA 780 SC @ 1163/1851
2600K @ 4.5
331.65

1920x1080

BaDBoY_uK · 13 Nov 2013 at 22:22

i7 4930k @ 4.6GHz
2 x MSI 280Xs
Clock Speed - 1150/1600
Driver Used - 13.11 beta9.2

~Mike~ · 14 Nov 2013 at 12:33

Nice scores.

Silent_Scone · 14 Nov 2013 at 17:25

Tri SLi 780Ti

1150/3850

4960X @ 4.5

Kaapstad · 14 Nov 2013 at 17:27

MjFrosty said:
Tri SLi 780Ti

1150/3850

4960X @ 4.5

Nice.

Gregster · 14 Nov 2013 at 17:41

Good score Frosty

Silent_Scone · 14 Nov 2013 at 17:49

Ta, might do another run at 4.7 later

Uncle Petey · 14 Nov 2013 at 18:22

Spoilers please, gentlemen

Something Else · 14 Nov 2013 at 18:26

My 7970 is the worst 7970 haha wont be long before im knocked off the 1080p board though

~Mike~ · 14 Nov 2013 at 19:43

Something Else said:
My 7970 is the worst 7970 haha wont be long before im knocked off the 1080p board though

I'm only 1 place above you. Can't you increase your OC a bit more?

Competitor rules

**The NEW Tomb Raider Benchmark Thread**

The NEW Tomb Raider Benchmark Thread