• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Unigine Heaven 4 benchmark

Well it looks like my 930 is running out of steam, going to 4.2ghz did not make any real difference. But saying that how much would l gain using faster ram?

But can't complain my son's more than happy with my old 920@4ghz as its on air.:)

Will be upgrading definitely next may as well wait for DDR4 and Haswell refresh.
 
Well it looks like my 930 is running out of steam, going to 4.2ghz did not make any real difference. But saying that how much would l gain using faster ram?

But can't complain my son's more than happy with my old 920@4ghz as its on air.:)

Will be upgrading definitely next may as well wait for DDR4 and Haswell refresh.

Faster RAM will not make any difference on this bench.

Also overclocking your CPU to 4.2 will not make much difference either as the fps @1440p are quite low so your CPU will have no problems keeping up.

Below is some runs I did to answer a similar question but on that occasion I was using 1080p (@1440p the differences will be even smaller).

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=25334074&postcount=1953
 
Last edited:
Just put my stock 290 pro in, i5 2500k @ 4.4ghz = 1253. Going to flash the bios with the Sapphire one to see if i get any improvement.

2qmky9u.png
 
Something doesn't look right with XE11's Trifire score. A stock 7990, 7970 and 4770k shouldn't be scoring close to 3.5k, especially when compared to trifire overclocked 7970's and Sandy-E chips. Glitched?

Edit: Even compared to blackninja who has the same gpu setup overclocked to 1150 and an ivy-e clocked to 4.7 scores 700 points less.
 
Last edited:
here's mine. (dont know how to do screen shot in heaven 4 :confused:)

HD7970 @ 940 MHz (stock voltage) 1375MHz
HD7990 @ stock (1000 MHz/1500 MHz but i think in trifire it dials down to match the 7970)
cpu and ram are stock too.

vxypLqi.jpg

Something doesn't look right with XE11's Trifire score. A stock 7990, 7970 and 4770k shouldn't be scoring close to 3.5k, especially when compared to trifire overclocked 7970's and Sandy-E chips. Glitched?

Edit: Even compared to blackninja who has the same gpu setup overclocked to 1150 and an ivy-e clocked to 4.7 scores 700 points less.

Just been looking at the entry again, and will remove it until XE11 can produce a proper in bench screenshot as per the rules in the OP.

I have not been too fussy about this in the past but any new entries must have an in bench screenshot as per the rules. No photos of the monitor can be accepted.

@XE11 if you get the chance, can you produce an in bench screenshot please.
 
Fair enough, but yh that score definitely doesn't seem right given more powerful systems overclocked with the same cards are scoring significantly less. My old 7990 overclocked to 1125/1700 managed 1990 on a 4770k @4.6 so I doubt that score hasn't glitched.
 
Fair enough, but yh that score definitely doesn't seem right given more powerful systems overclocked with the same cards are scoring significantly less. My old 7990 overclocked to 1125/1700 managed 1990 on a 4770k @4.6 so I doubt that score hasn't glitched.

Have you thought about putting in a score with your new setup, we have got no 3 way 290X scores yet.:)
 
Have you thought about putting in a score with your new setup, we have got no 3 way 290X scores yet.:)

Done a few runs at stock 1030/1250 (well stock clocks for powercolor 290x bios) and scored around 3850. Will see how far I can push them and what scores I can get. Would be looking to beat at least one of those titan setups :p
 
Back
Top Bottom