Caporegime
Yes.
Which means you can't look at an item like you could in a shop, as you can't open it.
Yes.
Not really because when I've bought from elsewhere the boxes have largely been sealed and not used in pre-testing for 8 Packs uber rigs .
To be fair, that page does have a hyperlink on the "unwanted" reason for return, which takes you to the conditions.
Which means you can't look at an item like you could in a shop, as you can't open it.
But how is it a satisfaction guarantee if it can't be used at all? For example, you get a new monitor, you open it, and upon use you realise its picture isn't satisfactory. You've stated it's opened, so will bear a restocking fee. Also you mentioned seals, which suggests if the seal's broken it a full refund won't be given. Which again isn't a guarantee of satisfaction.
With a monitor it is different, if the picture isn't satisfactory then surely it is because it has a fault and will refund/exchange the unit.
For examples monitors with backlight bleed, we take back no questions asked, for people with genuine reasons we will sort out no issue, but this is because we class these things more as faults and not un-wanted.
So, in short.
We no longer have the ability that we had pre legislation?
The new rules are the rules they are there to protect etailors from making losses from having to b-grade items used within the 14 day DSR period, hence the new rules.
When buying online I do not need to use a product to know I want it, as I simply know I want it and hence is the reason I am buying it. If I use it then I have used it and it is no longer new.
With a monitor it is different, if the picture isn't satisfactory then surely it is because it has a fault and will refund/exchange the unit.
For examples monitors with backlight bleed, we take back no questions asked, for people with genuine reasons we will sort out no issue, but this is because we class these things more as faults and not un-wanted.
Someone returning a graphics card because it does not overclock as well as they hope, is clearly no fault of the product and as such they have used it and will be charged a re-stocking fee.
You mentioned stipulations with monitors, such as backlight bleed.
What about a GPU with coil whine?
But the point is that it isn't a satisfaction guarantee any more, but you're still saying it is.
The example about the monitor was with regards to something like, I buy a TN monitor after reading reviews claiming it's a great monitor and doesn't suffer from the usual issues of TN panels. I buy the monitor, it has horrible colour shift. I am not satisfied at all. I bought it under the impression I was buying it with OcUK's superior 14 day satisfaction guarantee, which should mean I get a full refund since I'm very unhappy with the colour shift.
The stance really isn't that clear at all.
Well, that's okay then.
On the overclocking GPU's, I think buying any GPU and returning it under DSR if it's a poor clocker to be a bad show. But what about if you've bought a GPU geared to overclock, and it overclocks like crap?
Correct.
Well, that's okay then.
On the overclocking GPU's, I think buying any GPU and returning it under DSR if it's a poor clocker to be a bad show. But what about if you've bought a GPU geared to overclock, and it overclocks like crap?
Overclocking is not guaranteed and never has being. If it runs at the manufacturers claimed clock speeds which is normally higher for ones geared up for it then it is not faulty.
But we've been told nothing has changed for 99% of users. As Martini has suggested, if I bought a GPU that had bad coil whine (which isn't technically a fault as it doesn't hinder the graphics card's ability to carry out its function) I'd want to be sending that right back for either a full refund for replacement.
But it would be on a satisfaction guarantee, as that would be the purpose of spending more than other models that aren't built and advertised as an overclocker's dream. Like some are (lightnings, for example).