• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poll: 390X: How fast do you think it will be.

How fast will the 390X be?

  • Faster than the Titan-X @ 1080P - 1440P - 4K

    Votes: 59 22.1%
  • Faster than the Titan-X @ 4K only

    Votes: 15 5.6%
  • Within +/- ~5% of a Titan-X @ 1080P - 1440P - 4K

    Votes: 70 26.2%
  • Within +/- ~5% of a Titan-X @ 4K only

    Votes: 16 6.0%
  • Faster than the GTX 980 @ 1080P - 1440P - 4K

    Votes: 60 22.5%
  • Faster than the GTX 980 @ 4K only

    Votes: 10 3.7%
  • Within +/- ~5% of a GTX 980 @ 1080P - 1440P - 4K

    Votes: 17 6.4%
  • Within +/- ~5% of a GTX 980 @ 4K only

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • 94% or less the performance of a GTX 980.

    Votes: 16 6.0%

  • Total voters
    267
Done.

PS i can only add comments that make sense to the options, if you do want to be on the list please make clear and sensible comments. to go with joking around if nessesary :)
 
Last edited:
I'm voting faster than a TX at all resolutions, as otherwise it's a no from me.

I don't care if it's cheaper, AMD have had plenty of time to come up with a monster and this new HBM better not disappoint.
 
Hoping this will be a good card, if for anything to make NV to cut the TX down so I can get another, I voted a shade faster than a 980 which for the time they've had isn't good enough, if with this time they'd worked on CF profiles more then the speed would have been acceptable, but they haven't - so it isn't. Sorry AMD you have a lot to pull out of the bag.
 
Hoping this will be a good card, if for anything to make NV to cut the TX down so I can get another, I voted a shade faster than a 980 which for the time they've had isn't good enough, if with this time they'd worked on CF profiles more then the speed would have been acceptable, but they haven't - so it isn't. Sorry AMD you have a lot to pull out of the bag.

The Original Titan didn't drop by much after 290X so i don't see why this time would be any different.

What they might do is release the same card in 6GB form and call it the GTX 980TI, tho you probably wont be able to SLI is with a Titan-X.
 
Faster than the Titan-X ^^^^^ (1)

What are we going to use to measure the difference between the 390X and TitanX.

I am not a fan of most of the review sites as they tend to be quite useless with highend hardware.

Its in the OP Kaap! :p

I agree about reviewers, i think most of them are pretty useless full stop, including TPU but they are one of the best in a bad bunch.
And they are independent from user shenanigans, tho i do wonder about their independence sometimes, i think they do depend on those hardware vendors they review for their existence.

But what else can we do?
 
Back
Top Bottom