The Shadow of Mordor Bench.

Kaapstad · 31 Jul 2015 at 23:01

whyscotty said:
So what RU implying Kaap?

I was not implying anything, I was just stating the result looked odd.

It is something I have to do with anything out of the ordinary in these threads. I will also be getting to grips with how the Fury Xs work in multi GPU setups in the next few days.

Kaapstad · 1 Aug 2015 at 08:31

monkentage said:
Edited.

Thanks and on the scoreboard.

Silent_Scone · 2 Aug 2015 at 22:47

Well I fixed my scaling issue, and Win10 is working nicely

Stock TITAN X SLI run was 79.9fps (4.4 5960x)

1400/2000

Robzere31 · 2 Aug 2015 at 23:54

1440P

i7 4770K 4.5ghz (Water)
Gigabyte G1 980ti 1520/4001
Nivdia 353.62
Windows 10

88.84fps

Kaapstad · 3 Aug 2015 at 07:44

Silent_Scone said:
Well I fixed my scaling issue, and Win10 is working nicely

Stock TITAN X SLI run was 79.9fps (4.4 5960x)

1400/2000

Could you post your resolution and drivers please.

Kaapstad · 3 Aug 2015 at 07:52

Scoreboard updated.

Silent_Scone · 3 Aug 2015 at 08:58

Kaapstad said:
Could you post your resolution and drivers please.

4K and 353.63

LtMatt · 3 Aug 2015 at 09:13

I managed to improve my 1080P dual card score a little using Windows 10.

5960X @4.9Ghz
2x Fury X @1115/500Mhz
1080P

Kaapstad · 3 Aug 2015 at 10:58

Scoreboard updated.

Silent_Scone · 3 Aug 2015 at 22:35

Kaap remove my 4K 2 way entry it is wrong, made a mistake with settings (same as Neil), sorry

1440p 1x

5960 @ 4.4

TITAN X @ 1500/2000

1440p 2x

5960 @ 4.4

TITAN X @ 1420/200

GoogalyMoogaly · 3 Aug 2015 at 23:04

So are the 2 Nvidia guys that used the wrong settings not gonna post scores with the right settings?
Are they now not posting because their correct scores aren't as good?

Kaapstad · 4 Aug 2015 at 02:51

Scoreboard updated.

Silent_Scone · 4 Aug 2015 at 17:29

GoogalyMoogaly said:
So are the 2 Nvidia guys that used the wrong settings not gonna post scores with the right settings?
Are they now not posting because their correct scores aren't as good?

Don't be dense. I already had a score in that section anyway.

GoogalyMoogaly · 4 Aug 2015 at 20:26

Silent_Scone said:
Don't be dense. I already had a score in that section anyway.

Didn't think you were one of them?

straxusii · 4 Aug 2015 at 20:45

Got to say fair play to AMDMatt for posting the Fury X results, would have been so easy to just skip the benchmark after getting the results, only looked at 4k.

LtMatt · 5 Aug 2015 at 08:01

straxusii said:
Got to say fair play to AMDMatt for posting the Fury X results, would have been so easy to just skip the benchmark after getting the results, only looked at 4k.

I will have another go at the 1080P results when i get voltage control but i don't expect to be top of the boards. At 4K however i think I'll mostly dominate in multi gpu and win some lose some in single gpu.

Kaapstad · 5 Aug 2015 at 08:06

AMDMatt said:
I will have another go at the 1080P results when i get voltage control but i don't expect to be top of the boards. At 4K however i think I'll mostly dominate in multi gpu and win some lose some in single gpu.

My custom watercooled Fury Xs will be getting fitted soon !!!

Kaapstad · 14 Aug 2015 at 23:48

4 x TX @1442/2002
5960X @4.5
2160p
355.60 drivers

straxusii · 15 Aug 2015 at 08:24

TX 1475/2000
[email protected]
2160p
353.62 drivers

LtMatt · 15 Aug 2015 at 08:59

AMDMatt said:
I managed to improve my 1080P dual card score a little using Windows 10.

5960X @4.9Ghz
2x Fury X @1115/500Mhz
Windows 10
1080P

Big improvement in the SOM CrossFire profile under Windows 10 QuadFire, hardly any cpu bottleneck any more apart from a few stalls at the start of the bench.

5960X @4.9Ghz
4x Fury X
15.7.1
Windows 10
2160P

@1050/500Mhz

@1115/500Mhz