easyrider said:
The relevant advice is to offer the fastest performing components for the cheapest outlay.
And no one here has said "GET THE INTEL ITS THE BESTEST" once.Well I haven't
The 3800+ is the cheapest of the processors mentioned, the E6300 just about the fastest. The 2 are mutually exclusive.
easyrider said:
The 6300 is faster than the x2 3800 even at stock
Buying a x 2 is not future proofing its old tech and old design in the cpu sphere.
Yes but as i said. It is fairly minimal. Either way, the 3800+ is still £25 cheaper.
It is old in PC terms but it can still compete well, as shown in my link. At the low end of the scale there really isn't that much in it. When going to the higher end the gap does seem to increase significantly.
easyrider said:
Where does his post state he was concerned about power consumption?
Where does it state in my post that he is concerned about power consumption? I merely pointed it out as one of my reasons for going AM2.
easyrider said:
There are plenty of AMD users that only use AMD.I use whatever is the fastest for my money.
Few months back I had a top end dual core opteron.I speak from using both platforms.
Yes there are and yes you do but just because your situation suits going C2D over AM2 it doesn't mean that this is the same for everybody.
easyrider said:
No its not the x3800 is slower
Yes but it is also cheaper. Performance per £ i said.
easyrider said:
Have you seen the perfromance graphs of oblivion with conroe?
Since when does the Oblivion benchmarks encompass all modern games? And since when does "most modern games" (as per my post) mean all?
easyrider said:
His reasons are based on fanboyism.Anyone with any sense buys the best performing parts for their money.
If it was AM2 then I would suggest AM2.
I have already provided reasons for going AM2. OK, the reason he states is as a "fanboy" but hey. As long as he is happy, why does it matter?
easyrider said:
Why is offering advice stating you can spend the same money and have a faster pc an intel love fest?
You haven't though. An E6300 is more expensive than a 3800+. It is the same price as the 4200+ though roughly but as per the link i provided. The performance is very similar if taken across the board.