Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I'm actually pretty sceptical. If I'm not mistaken the card they kept calling the 'fastest in the world' was actually the dual GPU Fiji inside that weird little cube PC on the stage. So, logically a single Fury X is not faster than a Titan X? Or am I just crazy?
So other than a lot of random numbers and there names and prices they told us jack ****?
Other than the nano = 290x and a fury = 1 and a half 290x's?
Not sure why all back slaping going on?
He just said the fastest graphics card in the world....not GPU. So not quicker than a Titan X?
4096stream processors 4GB vram..
Worlds fastest gfx .....woop
So it is about 50%+ more than 290x, if it is same power consumption and 1.5x perf/watt
You can still cancel
So £500 for a card that might be slightly quicker than the 980Ti assuming the benchmarks back it up, but still 300W or so?
So if it's running 4K at 60+FPS that's not good enough for you? 4GB HBM is not 4GB DDR5.
She said 5k @ 45fps on ultra settings and tomb raider 4k @ 60 fps on ultra settings. Nor sure how the nvidia cards do on tomb raider at 4k????