Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Streetlight · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:18

AMD shares boys.....

AMD shares.....

passey89 · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:18

ocuk plz take my money. $649 hopefully translates to £ properly.

Kaapstad · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:18

FinglisHobbit said:
Unless its the dual card the Titan X will still be fastest. However if its faster than the Ti then they are onto a winner at that price.

The Nano is pretty awesome too.

They are onto a winner as it is cheaper and quieter than a TX with performance that will be quite close.

Loxa · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:18

Scramz said:
45fps was in 5K

Yeah i no.

LtMatt · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:19

LoadsaMoney said:
Stunning!

Agreed.

Mark me down for four.

Kelt · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:19

Jokester said:
So £500 for a card that might be slightly quicker than the 980Ti assuming the benchmarks back it up, but still 300W or so?

But, but...the programmable LEDS!

Greebo · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:19

Frenzy said:
Just googled and it seems about the same as the 980Ti?

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/nvidia_geforce_gtx_980_ti_review,17.html

Yeah looks on par then.

CapitalOne · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:19

Kaapstad said:
Reading between the lines the Fury X will compete directly with the 980 Ti on price and performance.

That's what I concluded too (not that you need my sanction).

TX still faster.

Interested to see TX SLI vs Fuji CF. It will need 8GB before I buy one though.

Still - all very interesting

Nutella33 · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:19

2x 8 pins for the Fury X, one 6 and an 8 pin for the Fury and the 390

Jokester · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:19

TNA said:
That is the water cooled version. Aircooled one should be under £400 I think.

Also some new tech. HBM

Was it? Sure they said the Fury X was $649, or is the Fury the same thing but on air?

Klunt Bumskrint · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:19

Dicehunter said:
Well their dual GPU will but I have a feeling Nvidia will release a dual Titan X card soon.

HOW MUCH WOULD THAT BE?!?!

Ayahuasca · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:19

Greebo said:
Titan x only does 26 fps on Tomb Raider at ultra details on 4k. If the fury x does 60 fps then AMD have nailed it

lol

People seem to be getting a little hyped over nothing? The majority of that info today has already been leaked and spoke about in this thread. Everyone is still waiting for actual gaming figures.

jimjam81 · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:19

Is 295x not the fastest GPU at the moment? Could she be referring to Fury x2 being faster than that instead of TX ?

DBT85 · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:20

Specs

http://www.amd.com/en-gb/products/graphics/desktop/r9#3

LoadsaMoney · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:20

Jokester said:
Was it? Sure they said the Fury X was $649, or is the Fury the same thing but on air?

I think Furys few less streams, bit like the 290/290X, 290X being Fury X, Fury being the 290 non X.

FoxEye · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:20

CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
Probably a a few percent faster than a R9 290X but at half the wattage,so it has around twice the performance per watt.

This is what I'm thinking.

DM said it would be "way faster than a 290X" and I don't know why he got that impression...

CAT-THE-FIFTH · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:20

LoadsaMoney said:
Im going Fury X!

I so want the Fuji Nano for my PC as it is a SFF one in Cubitek Mini Cube case. I suspect it might be quite expensive though!

Twirlywoos · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:20

and an extra saving (approx £150) with freesync monitors compared to gsync equivalent. It's shaping up nicely.

thebennyboy · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:20

Get your credit cards out!

Kaapstad · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:21

CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
Probably a a few percent faster than a R9 290X but at half the wattage,so it has around twice the performance per watt.

+1

It is easy to improve the performance per watt by cutting the clockspeeds and using more cores.