HDD to SSD migration using Acronis True Image 12, it friggin' works brillliantly :D

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
106,781
Location
Uranus hehehe
ssd_osinatll.png


First off, my Win7 install dates back to when it came out, some of you will already know that I do maintain my OS to a somewhat anally strict level and as such, once the HDD is booted up and running, it runs as smooth as a peach. I do not have rogue reg entries from uninstalled games and software as I manually remove those, I do not have crap and temp files all over the place as I manage those too.

I do have a lot of software installed though and a lot of customisations which would take me many hours to put back to this state. Previously this same install got cloned from a 320GB Seagate SATA II drive to a WD Black 500GB so this isn't the first time this install has moved home ;)

I'm creating this thread because I think there are others in the same situation I found myself, with a smooth install and not wanting to reinstall everything again.

There are many guides online showing you how you can migrate a normal HDD to an SSD, some recommend Windows Backup & Restore while others recommend various HDD/Partition Managers.
I used Acronis 12 as that's what I had access to and it's worth noting that Acronis 11 and 12 have full support for SSD drive alignment even though no documentation mentions SSD at all!. It also seemed to be the simplest.

Prep:
Before creating an image backup you will need to prep the OS to be SSD ready. I disabled the usual stuff, defrag schedule, prefetch (not superfetch, this is something completely different and is needed), Windows Search, System Restore and set the Pagefile to a fixed 1024MB.
I then ran a cmd to make sure my OS was TRIM enabled.

It's not safe to start the backup/imaging process. It should be noted that you should make sure the OS partition is smaller than the size of the SSD otherwise it won't fit :p


Restore:
I created 2 backups on to an external backup drive, one Windows Image Backup (.vhd) and one Acronis image (.itb) just to be doubly safe.

I partitioned the SSD using Acronis (booted off the CD) by creating a single partition leaving 1MB of unallocated space before the partition, this was recommend a number of times on Paragon's forums by admins in other threads about SSD migration. Then I selected to mark the partition as active.

From here it's a simple case of restoring the whole drive on to the SSD. Took about 30 minutes to restore the 81GB partition.

At this point I should add that my original HDD install was NOT correctly aligned for SSD usage, AS SSD reported it as a bad alignment. This will be the test to see if Acronis does indeed support SSD alignment (it did :p).

Plugged the new SSD in and booted up and all was superb. Windows detected the new drive and rebooted then I did a system performance scan and did a few benchmarks (below). Performance is exactly on spec and I have had absolutely no problem at all. My old install has a new lease of life, everything loads in an instant, my PC boots up and logs in before my LAN has had time to initialise and STEAM/Origin start in offline mode until a few seconds pass - Simple outstanding!

AS SSD:
ssdasssd.PNG


ATTO:
ssd_atto.png


Winodws:
ssd_1-winscore.PNG


SSD = Best performance upgrade you can ever do to your computer!
 
Last edited:
Nice :)

Although I don't understand the relevance of leaving 1Mb of unallocated space prior to the boot partition, I thought that this was just a work-around for earlier version of ATI that don't natively support SSD alignment. I also read that the safer method is to restore by partition rather than whole disk. But this is a moot point as it all seems to have worked out nicely for you. Grats on your shiny new upgrade ;)
 
Last edited:
Aye my HDD never had a system reserved partition, only one partition spanning the entire disk, probably why it was out of alignment in the first place.

I didn't want to chance it going out of alignment on the SSD by not putting the 1MB space before (note, space, not a partition!) so just made sure the default 1MB of space was not after the PS partition but before (only doable if you manually select partitions to restore) and as such I restored the only available partitions, the OS and the MBR part of the disk :)
 
I've always been a big fan of Acronis, especially on a CD for booting off machines and backing up to NAS. This is one feature I have yet to use so I'm glad to hear it works well. :)
 
Yeah I use ATI at work and was very surprised when I found the bootable CD contains network drivers built in as well so I could backup and restore to/from the domain!
 
Too bad you picked a Sandforce based drive and might have issues with it :P Any reason you didn't go for an M4? You would have got a 7.9 in WEI then!
 
Too bad you picked a Sandforce based drive and might have issues with it :P Any reason you didn't go for an M4? You would have got a 7.9 in WEI then!

What makes the M4 so special to get 7.9? Not that it bothers me (.2 difference lol) considering the Force 3 was £20 cheaper and Corsair's FW update to 1.3.3 fixes the sleep/power issue people reported on Sandforce drives.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I use ATI at work and was very surprised when I found the bootable CD contains network drivers built in as well so I could backup and restore to/from the domain!

I found the transfer rate to be terrible when restoring an image from the network with ATI (couple of hundred KB/s), going the other way was fine. I ended up copying the image file onto an external USB2 drive and restoring from there to get a better transfer rate.

I tend to just use my Ubuntu Live USB for imaging now, gParted and DD do everything i want and have never let me down.
 
What makes the M4 so special to get 7.9? Not that it bothers me considering the Force 3 was £20 cheaper and Corsair's FW update to 1.3.3 fixes the sleep/power issue people reported on Sandforce drives.

Not sure, if you run a winsat -disk from an elevated command prompt, I could do the same and we could compare?
 
Hi done clean install had Marvell Sata 3 controller but got better speeds by direct connection mine is m4 and defo worth extra 20 quid soz pkr readings available on request p43tdpro with 3 gb and q9300 ta for top forum ;)
 
I understood 50% of what you just said^^

Also, it's pretty clear there's not over £20 worth of performance gain in the M4 :p
 
Back
Top Bottom