A 24-70 is a very common lens for weddings, used by many pros combined with a 70-200m f/2.8. If you are on crop then a 17-55mm f/2.8 might be better or add a wider lenses.
I second shot a wedding with a 24-70 and 70-200 as my primary lenses on a crop body. 70-200 is useful for some reportage style shots in the evening, to capture details but can also be a critical tool if you are in a church that requires the photographer to be at the back of the church. I have also been the primary photographer at a civil wedding and used a 35mm f/1.8DX, 50mm 1.8DX, 70-200mm f/2.8 and a 16-85mm f3.5-5.6VR for groups. The primes give great shots, help when indoors or when you want a shallower DoF.
However, I actually found my 16-85mm f3.5-5.6 to give fantastic results and a lot of keepers, faster AF than the primes, shooting at f/8 captures a lot of the details and much less likely to give focus errors. when you shoot with a shallow Dof you have a very high chance of getting a focus error because someone moves their head that fraction of an inch and bamb, ruined photo. Common problem with beginners is to assume you should always shoot razor thin DoF, you will end up with a load of photos where either the bride or groom is in focus, but not both, or only 1 eye and not the other - looks very amateurish (at the sme time you don't want distracting background so if you shoot with a narrower aperture then be sure to keep an eye on what is behind the subject, moving a few steps to the side can make all the difference in change a fire exit sign to be a flower arrangement).
I wouldn't shoot solely primes on your first wedding unless A) you were very confident in using the primes, B) you can rapidly swap lenses without looking, having lenses strapped to your belt.
Nothing worse than someone stuck at the same focal length and not controlling perspective properly by changing lenses or simply using a zoom lens (just as bad if not worse than not moving your feet).
Last edited:
