Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 3,027
what is it, a simple question?
If you were any sharper you would cut yourself.penski said:I assume that they have oxygen, hydrogen, water crystals, clouds...Much the same as here in the UK.
*n
penski said:I assume that they have oxygen, hydrogen, water crystals, clouds...Much the same as here in the UK.
*n
iCraig said:They also have methane and other pollutants.
salami1212 said:what is it, a simple question?
Dj_Jestar said:I rarely watch TV anymore and received a stark reminder why last night with CSI on Sky (livingTV I think it was..)
11pm .. Sat down to watch.
11:02 CSI Starts.
11:04 Ad break.
11:09 CSI Continues.
11:14 Ad-break.
11:23 CSI Continues.
11:29 Ad-break
11:38 CSI Continues
11:44 Ad-break
11:51 CSI Continues
11:54 CSI Finishes.
...
Dj_Jestar said:11pm .. Sat down to watch.
11:02 CSI Starts.
11:04 Ad break.
11:09 CSI Continues.
11:14 Ad-break.
11:23 CSI Continues.
11:29 Ad-break
11:38 CSI Continues
11:44 Ad-break
11:51 CSI Continues
11:54 CSI Finishes.
...
Visage said:Then thats a problem with LivingTV, rather than Sky.
The MMC (now Competition Commission) have never got hold of anyone - Even when they went after Murdoch and News International for their stranglehold on the UK media. They are, essentially, toothless.HEADRAT said:
Visage said:Sky dont have a monopoly on satellite broadcast in this country......
HEADRAT said:The Americans are lucky and they have a proper choice of many providers unlike the UK where we have 1 premium satellite provider This provider dominates the market and why the Monopolies and Mergers Commission have never got hold of them beats me.
Well it doesn't actaully the fact that Murdock controls a huge portion of the press and media means it would give any goverment that probed its monopoly the ride of its life is why Sky holds us in an iron grip!
HEADRAT
Chronos-X said:I think you'll find they very much do to all intents and purposes!
But Sky has a monopoly on Sky movies, Sky sports and the other Sky channels.Visage said:So how is it that you can receive Channel 4, UKTV channels, BBC etc by Satellite, when none of them are sky companies, and in many cases you dont evn need a Sky account to receive them?
Sky have a monopoly on Satellite, just like NTL now do on Cable. In some parts of the country, if you want digital, your only choice is Sky satellite. Neither cable nor freeview yet have the countrywide reach that satellite does. That, in my view, makes at least a partial monopoly.Visage said:So how is it that you can receive Channel 4, UKTV channels, BBC etc by Satellite, when none of them are sky companies, and in many cases you dont evn need a Sky account to receive them?