• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

BFG 8800 Ultra Vs 8800 GTX ?!?!!!

Associate
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
1,499
Okay so thinking about a new card and just noticed some interesting things -

BFG GeForce 8800 GTX OC2 768MB GDDR3 HDTV/Dual DVI (PCI-Express) - Retail - £399.49 - Core 626mhz, Shader 1450mhz, Mem 2000mhz

BFG GeForce 8800 Ultra 768MB GDDR3 HDTV/Dual DVI (PCI-Express) - Retail - £528.74 - Core 612mhz, Shader 1500mhz, Mem 2160mhz


So for a slightly lower clocked core, 50 mhz on the shaders and 160mhz on the memory we are paying £128 more?

Are you serious BFG?!?! Maybe I missed something but I dont think so. Does

Nvidia/BFG think we are completely stupid?

Maybe it is just a good price on the GTX?
 
maybe not but then why don't they just not buy the chips at stupid prices knowing their customers are not complete muppets. Sadly I know there is a few muppets out there with more money than sense but the majority of people when presented with the numbers should take note.
 
tomanders91 said:
i thoguht a ultra was just an overclocked GTX? So basicly theres no point in paying more is there?

That's what I thought also. Just buy a GTX and clock it. :) Pocket the difference.
 
Some people will fork out for it regardless of price just because they can. As aforementioned, BFG aren't stupid, people are.
 
tomanders91 said:
i thoguht a ultra was just an overclocked GTX? So basicly theres no point in paying more is there?

Its not worth a lot more, that's true. But it's a bit more than just an overclocked GTX. It has a newer core revision, that uses less power at the higher core speed. It also has very fast ram 0.8ns, all better for potential overclocking.

Ultra thread, and another
 
Last edited:
but i bet you can get a even nicer overclock out of the ultra that will leave the GTX behind but still not worth the money, but then again if money was no object course i would have one ;)
 
Willis said:
but i bet you can get a even nicer overclock out of the ultra that will leave the GTX behind but still not worth the money, but then again if money was no object course i would have one ;)

Pfft. I'd have two. :p
 
You can't really compare the two unless the ultra is overclocked aswell. Sure an overclocked GTX has similar performance to the ultra stock but what if the ultra is also overclocked (if it does indeed overclock)?
 
w3bbo said:
You can't really compare the two unless the ultra is overclocked aswell. Sure an overclocked GTX has similar performance to the ultra stock but what if the ultra is also overclocked (if it does indeed overclock)?

I guess your right in a sense, but I wonder how well it does clocked? Is it not pushed pretty far already? Sooo many questions! :D
 
We won't know until someone buys one. I cant see many GTX owners 'upgrading' unless its for bragging rights.
 
w3bbo said:
We won't know until someone buys one. I cant see many GTX owners 'upgrading' unless its for bragging rights.

Aye. The word Ultra is much better than GTX, don't you know. :D
 
Aurhinius said:
Okay so thinking about a new card and just noticed some interesting things -

BFG GeForce 8800 GTX OC2 768MB GDDR3 HDTV/Dual DVI (PCI-Express) - Retail - £399.49 - Core 626mhz, Shader 1450mhz, Mem 2000mhz

BFG GeForce 8800 Ultra 768MB GDDR3 HDTV/Dual DVI (PCI-Express) - Retail - £528.74 - Core 612mhz, Shader 1500mhz, Mem 2160mhz


So for a slightly lower clocked core, 50 mhz on the shaders and 160mhz on the memory we are paying £128 more?

Are you serious BFG?!?! Maybe I missed something but I dont think so. Does

Nvidia/BFG think we are completely stupid?

Maybe it is just a good price on the GTX?

Get the gtx and keep the extra £128 and spend it on beer :p
 
Back
Top Bottom