Crysis SP Demo GPU Benchmark Thread

Tom|Nbk · 4 Nov 2007 at 00:38

As I have seen a ton of these Crysis benchmark numbers floating around I figure it's was a good idea to create this thread so we can cram it all into here and get an idea of how current hardware in the hands of us enthusiasts handles this game. Also Gives you GT guys the chance to get yours up so you can let others know how these superb cards are doing in Crysis

All bench at 1280x1024 Everything HIGH to get a fair comparison, but feel free to also include your OWN settings to compare with others

Here are my results 1280x1024 everything HIGH

Here are the results from the settings I game with

Everyone else get your screenshots up, don't be shy

Make sure you get GPU-Z and CPU-Z screenies along with the little Dos box at the end so we know your specs, also don't forget to list game settings and resolution!

willhub · 4 Nov 2007 at 00:45

1680x1050, ALL HIGH, MEDIUM POST PROCESSING.

GPU @ 680/1750/1000.

Tom|Nbk · 4 Nov 2007 at 00:48

MAKE SURE YOU GET NVIDIA/ATI CONTROL PANEL SETTINGS UP.

Tom|Nbk · 4 Nov 2007 at 00:50

here is my NVCP settings

RavenXXX2 · 4 Nov 2007 at 00:56

How come your not benching all at high, why knock PP down to medium?

XP32-1680x1050-ALL HIGH/POST PROCESSING ON MEDIUM

Tom|Nbk · 4 Nov 2007 at 00:56

RavenXXX2 said:
How come your not benching all at high, why knock PP down to medium?

Because these are the settings I use when playing the game?, I thought that would be common sense. It's more of a case get your own settings up so we can see how the game performs on a range of different settings/setups

Also Raven you forgot to include your settings.......

willhub · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:01

RavenXXX2 said:
How come your not benching all at high, why knock PP down to medium?

What settings were you using? I was all high except post process to medium yet you get full 10+ fps more than me :confused:

easyrider · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:03

willhub said:
What settings were you using? I was all high except post process to medium yet you get full 10+ fps more than me

Exactly my point.

If this thread is going to work

we all need to bench at the same settings.

Tom|Nbk · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:06

It would work if people included their settings in their screenshots then we can gauge a wide range of settings/setups and people can compare between themselves.

EDIT : Cheers for edit Raven

easyrider · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:09

Tom|Nbk said:
It would work if people included their settings in their screenshots then we can gauge a wide range of settings/setups and people can compare between themselves.

Why haven't you left yet easy, to you this thread is pointless is it not. If you don't like it buggar off.

The best way would be to have a difinitve bench

that way all data could be compared.

RavenXXX2 · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:09

willhub said:
What settings were you using? I was all high except post process to medium yet you get full 10+ fps more than me

Maybe its because i have texture filtering set to high performance.. :confused:

fornowagain · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:10

Tom|Nbk said:
It would work if people included their settings in their screenshots then we can gauge a wide range of settings/setups and people can compare between themselves.

Better to first post at the same reference settings to gauge relative performance. Then the tweaked settings and results. That would be very useful to me for one.

easyrider · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:10

It would make it easy for analysis.

all high @1680x 1050 on differnt cards and cpus set to high

Then we can truly make comparisons

Raikiri · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:14

!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 48.48s, Average FPS: 40.86
Min FPS: 16.98 at frame 138, Max FPS: 50.49 at frame 1782
Average Tri/Sec: -39979748, Tri/Frame: -969016
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.95
Press any key to continue . . .

1680x1050, post processing on medium, everything else on high

easyrider · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:15

fornowagain said:
Better to first post at the same reference settings to gauge relative performance. Then the tweaked settings and results. That would be very useful to me for one.

Agreed,

Without a common ground the acitivity makes it pointless.

we all need to bench from the same book

Tom|Nbk · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:17

OK taken Forno's advice into consideration.

All bench at 1280x1024 Everything HIGH from now on, but feel free to also include your OWN settings to compare with others

Uploading results now.

easyrider · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:19

Tom|Nbk said:
OK taken Forno's advice into consideration.

All bench at 1280x1024 Everything HIGH from now on

Uploading results now.

It takes some time to get it across fornowagain

Tom|Nbk · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:21

OK

Here are my results 1280x1024 everything HIGH

Was shocked to find performance didn't change much upping or lowering resolution

RavenXXX2 · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:27

Man, 1280x1024 looks like crap on my monitor, glad i don't go there often.

XP32BIT ALL HIGH

Raikiri · 4 Nov 2007 at 01:27

My results are a little strange, it gives a low minimum FPS but in no point during the test did it actually go below 28fps.

Play Time: 48.20s, Average FPS: 41.50
Min FPS: 12.86 at frame 149, Max FPS: 51.52 at frame 1005
Average Tri/Sec: -44016872, Tri/Frame: -1060714
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.86