Eizo Foris FS2735 - 27", IPS, 1440p, 144hz, Blur Reduction, Freesync

I am SOO slow. But here's the post I made, before I was ninja'ed:

Hmm, seems like a direct competitor to the Asus MG279Q, right? Both even have a non-PWM backlight, which is nice. So indeed, like said above, the Freesync range and the price will be the main interest now.

For comparison, Asus has a Freesync range of 35-90Hz, at £500. But considering it's an Eizo, I'm looking at £600, unfortunately. Though possibly/hopefully better QA, as well.

I would personally prefer a 1920x1080. Most optimal for me would be >32" at 1920x1080, but I'm guessing I'm in a very small minority, apparently...
 
@Solz:
Hmm, that video gave a little too much emphasis on the "cloud" and mobile connectivity. Do gamers really crave for these features...? Got me less excited, tbh. Because when they're focusing on one aspect, they usually lose it on another. Alternatively, price premiums. Well, waiting for reviews and retail availability, I guess.
 
melmac said:
This is using the game panel as the Asus MG279Q.

Would be nice to have a few different panel options.
Click to expand...

Yup, very likely the same panel.

The key differences here is a vendor blur reduction mode (which will excellent if it is anything like Turbo240 on the Foris FG2421), hopefully a better Freesync range and differences in the overdrive circuit / input lag of the scaler.

Let's hope they can also minimise IPS glow and backlight bleeding that plagued the Asus MG279Q.
 
aatu said:
@Solz:
Hmm, that video gave a little too much emphasis on the "cloud" and mobile connectivity. Do gamers really crave for these features...? Got me less excited, tbh. Because when they're focusing on one aspect, they usually lose it on another. Alternatively, price premiums. Well, waiting for reviews and retail availability, I guess.
Click to expand...

I concur with you on this - I don't like that focus either.

As a counter-argument though, they are introducing those features to the other existing Foris models in their range as a 'value added feature' so therefore it might not have be exclusively a huge area for this monitor alone.
 
I guess them features are there if you wanna use them, I suppose you don't have to use them if you don't want to,
...still think it ll be a cracking monitor hopefully better then the disgrACER I mean Acer ;) and a free sync equivalent of the gsync
 
SiDeards73 said:
Was set on either the BenQ or the Asus but it looks like we could have a new contender, will have to wait for more Infoz and reviews
Click to expand...

13333338.jpg
 
I love Eizo blur reduction but 27 inch is huge i do not understand this craze when they could have put 1440p into 24 or so? I have a 24" Foris on the end of my desk it simply will not go out more than arms length and to be honest bigger means more waste.

My eyes cannot grasp everything unless you sit back but then it becomes a TV and not a monitor? That is a waste of 1440p and typical 100ish PPI. This will keep irritating me until 4K 144HZ but until then they could easily boost PPI my way. And going by phones and smaller Youtube videos it is a method that is very good.
 
Rofflay said:
I love Eizo blur reduction but 27 inch is huge i do not understand this craze when they could have put 1440p into 24 or so? I have a 24" Foris on the end of my desk it simply will not go out more than arms length and to be honest bigger means more waste.

My eyes cannot grasp everything unless you sit back but then it becomes a TV and not a monitor? That is a waste of 1440p and typical 100ish PPI. This will keep irritating me until 4K 144HZ but until then they could easily boost PPI my way. And going by phones and smaller Youtube videos it is a method that is very good.
Click to expand...

Totally agree - I recently tried and returned an Asus MG279Q for that very reason - excellent monitor but too large.

24/25" is about my limit for normal desk use.
 
Lets assume its the same panel as Asus MG279Q would this mean same free sync range from 35 to 90 or can they improve with there own technology eg (Turbo240).
 
It doesn't DEFINITELY mean the same range, but there's indeed a possibility that Asus already tried their best to maximize the range, but didn't manage to do better with that particular panel. In that case, Eizo might have a hard time improving that range.

But on the other hand, Asus might have just as well cut corners when trying to set the range, and settled for a "good enough". Alternatively, it might be that even though Asus did a fine job, Eizo can put even more effort for a better range. Or they might also choose to make compromises on pixel response times or input lag, to increase the range. Which might be a worse solution, even if it did give a better range.
 
jigger said:
I know Ezio professional range is top notch, but what are Eizo desktop screens usually like on quality control?
Click to expand...

No better than most other manufacturers, unfortunately. :) And don't be fooled into thinking their customer service is any good either, at least not compared to Dell or Samsung from recent user reports I've received.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom