Associate
I don't need you to go into any detail, the test is nonsense. If it is no more effective for your purpose than some other rather arbitrary method of selection then it would seem it isn't the test itself that has anything to do with it nor can be said to be effective at anything. I mean if you rolled some dice perhaps would you claim the dice were effective at guiding some decisions? Or that the dice were driving high performance for you etc...?
I don't need you to go into any detail, the test is nonsense. If it is no more effective for your purpose than some other rather arbitrary method of selection then it would seem it isn't the test itself that has anything to do with it nor can be said to be effective at anything. I mean if you rolled some dice perhaps would you claim the dice were effective at guiding some decisions? Or that the dice were driving high performance for you etc...?
Your enduring and persistent desire to argue for argument's sake really does undermine your credibility when you have a good point to make. Feel free to have the last word. I won't be reading.
If it were no more accurate than an arbitrary method then you'd be correct, but I doubt that's the case. I don't doubt that it has its shortcomings (as I feel any psychoanalytical tool will, due to the infinitely complex nature of the human mind) but enough people find it helpful that you can't just write it off as completely random and useless. Bear in mind that it's based on the work of Carl Jung, who was a respected psychoanalyst. There might be legitimate criticism to be levelled at the interpretation that resulted in the MBTI structure, but you're giving it far harsher treatment than that.
As for being "based on the work of Carl Jung" if I were to read some stuff by a famous psychologist then come up with my own test do you then argue for the validity of my test on the fact it is based on some stuff I read by a famous psychologist?
See also "NLP" for another example of pseudoscientific Psychology guff HR chicks believe in.
Gucci belt included or has he not yet reached the levels of highest revenue earner?I heard a rumour that if you repeat 'NLP' five times into a mirror your knob turns brown and Asim18 appears holding a bottle of bleach and a MAC-10.
Anyway I'll leave it there. This thread was supposed to be for fun and I can tell you're not willing to consider any other points of view on the matter.
I heard a rumour that if you repeat 'NLP' five times into a mirror your knob turns brown and Asim18 appears holding a bottle of bleach and a MAC-10.
I’m a Protagonist, apparently. I feel it’s pretty accurate, as far as these things go!
Took this test the other week, came out as Mediator. Some of the questions are extremely vague.