• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

16k 3dmark06 marks gts ?

Andeh said:
Simply not true at all.
I game at 1920x1080 on my TV, which is almost the same as 1900x1200, and I can get a solid 80fps on the likes of UT3, and thats with my mid range system (see sig). So the GTS can handle high resolutions quite nicely.


:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Just going on experience of both cards.

Having owned both.:)
 
Last edited:
I have a GTX, but if i didn't and i had to choose i'd go for the G92 GTS simply because they usually overclock quite a lot more. My GTX wont even hit 640MHz core and be stable.

But without no overclocking theres no doubt the GTX is better.
 
im not 100% certin, but from reading various reviews, the ASUS G92 GTS seems to be the best clocker, and seems to give better performance over the BFG/XFX/Gigabyte cards.
 
I get 19700 in 06 ;) :D That's with a 3870X2, also, 1920x1200 isn't that demanding, my 2900XT played pretty much everything I have maxed at good FPS bar crysis of course.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom