2 questions

Soldato
Joined
17 Dec 2004
Posts
8,743
Are these laptops ok price wise and what 1 would you go for?

image2gn.jpg
 
Last edited:
Another for the Lenovo, there's a lot more than speed that comes into it, you've got portability, build quality, screen quality, speaker quality
 
The ASUS has an older 65nm CPU and only uses DDR2 RAM. The other two have 45nm cpu's though neither support virtualisation. They will at least have a newer chipset since they have DDR3 RAM. So I would personally discount the cheap ASUS.

If the machine is going to do a lot of travelling get the Lenovo, their reputation for build quality is second to none, otherwise go for the cheaper Acer and get the bigger HD.

I'd like to know the screen resolution though, the Lenovo is WXGA, which is normally 1280x800, but on current 16 x 9 screens may well be 1366 x 768. The vertical resolution of laptops is getting smaller all the time, this means less real estate to work on and more scrolling to read web pages!
 
The Lenovo will probably have better build quality than the Acer, but if you want to save money and don't mind Acer as a brand (they are a lot better than they use to be btw), then i would go for the Acer.
 
The question is, do you consider it worth paying £45 for an extra 100mhz CPU, 70GB larger hard drive, integrated bluetooth and (perhaps) better build quality? If so, the Lenovo is the way forward, otherwise it's the Asus. I've had nothing but shame and heartbreak in dealing with Acer, and would not recommend them to anybody.
 
Back
Top Bottom