2005/2006 F1 News and Testing.

F1 Buyout Hurdles Delay Resolving the Future of the Sport

Formula one's road to peace is being held up by its new owner, McLaren principal Ron Dennis revealed this week.

He said the carmakers' disgruntled 'breakaway' group is having trouble dealing with 86 per cent shareholder CVC Capital Partners, because the buyout deal is yet to get EU approval.

''At the moment (it) does not own formula one,'' the Briton told Reuters.

Dennis suggested that there is also an 'issue' with Lehman -- a third bank that is yet to agree to sell the final 14 per cent of the formula one business.

It is still expected that, legally, Lehman could challenge CVC's right to buy the sport before any of the three banks were offered the shares.

Such a scenario could scupper the whole CVC deal.

Dennis, the Woking based team principal, added that until the issues are resolved, CVC is 'not in a position to sit and talk to us.'
 
Also just like to put this up on a very personal note - one of my biggest regrets is being too young to appreciate watching Colin and his cars going around Hethal test track and as an engineer and innovator - he is untouchable.

23 years have passed since his death so...



Anthony Colin Bruce Chapman

Colin Chapman (born 9 May 1928 in London - died 16 December 1982) was an influential designer and inventor in the car industry. In 1952 he founded the sports car company Lotus Cars. He studied structural engineering at University College, London where he joined the University Air Squadron and learned to fly. After graduating in 1948, he briefly joined the Royal Air Force. His knowledge of the latest aeronautical engineering techniques would later prove useful in several of his major technical advances in cars. He died of a heart attack.

Career

Chapman started with the Mk1, a small soap box on wheels, which he entered privately into local racing events. With the prize money he developed the Mk2, Mk3 each with growing success, and as such he could begin to sell kits of these cars. It was with the Mk7 that things really took off, and indeed Caterham still make that car today, and several copy-cat makes are also available.

Chapman progressed through the motor racing formulae, until he arrived in Formula 1. He, along with John Cooper, revolutionised the sport. Their small, lightweight vehicles gave away much in terms of power, but superior handling meant they could take on and beat the all-conquering Ferraris and Maseratis. With his beloved driver Jim Clark at the wheel, they could win races almost as they pleased, and Jim Clark would surely have won many more titles where it not for his untimely death in 1968 behind the wheel of a Formula 2 Lotus.

Chapman was also a businessman who introduced sponsorship into Formula 1, beginning the process of raising the sport from gentlemen's entertainment to a multi-million pound enterprise. Shortly before his death, he became involved in John De Lorean's De Lorean Motor Company venture to manufacture sports cars. The full extent of his involvement has never been made public, but it is believed he would have been prosecuted for his involvement of inveigling government funds.

Innovations

Many of his ideas can still be seen in Formula 1 and other top levels of motor sport today.

He pioneered the use of struts as a rear suspension device. Even today, struts used in the rear of a vehicle are known as Chapman struts.

His next major innovation was to adopt the use of monocoque (stressed-skin) unibodies (i.e. it replaced both the body and frame, which until then had been separate components) for cars. This was the first major advance in which he introduced aeroplane technology to cars. The resultant body was both lighter, stronger (i.e. stiffer), and also provided better driver protection in the event of a crash. The first Lotus to feature this technology was the Lotus Elite, in 1958. Amazingly, the body of the car was made out of fibreglass, making it also the first car made out of composites.

In 1962 he extended this innovation to racing cars, with the revolutionary Lotus 25 Formula 1 car. This technique fairly quickly replaced what had been for many decades the standard in racing-cars, the tube-frame chassis. Although the material has changed from sheet aluminium to carbon fibre, this remains today the standard technique for building top-level racing cars.

It was he who really brought aerodynamics into being a first-rank influence on car engineering. He popularized the concept of positive aerodynamic downforce, through the addition of front and rear wings. Early efforts were mounted 3 feet or so above the car, in order to operate in 'clean air' (i.e. air that would not otherwise be disturbed by the passage of the car). However the thin supporting struts failed regularly, forcing the FIA to require the wings to be attached directly to the bodywork. He also pioneered the movement of radiators away from the front of the car, to decrease air resistance at speed. Both of these concepts also remain features of high performance racing cars today.

Another concept of Chapman's was "ground effect", whereby a partial vacuum was created under the car by use of venturis, generating "downforce" which held it securely to the road whilst cornering, etc. (Modern racing cars generate enough downforce that they could theoretically be driven on the ceiling once they are up to speed, although the fuel system and other parts of the car rely on gravity and so a Formula One car could not in reality be driven upside down.) Initially this technique utilized sliding "skirts" which made contact with the ground to keep the area of low pressure isolated. The skirts were also banned, for if during cornering the car went over a curb, and the skirt were damaged, downforce was lost, and the car could become extremely unstable. Downforce remains a critical part of racing car technology, and modern designers, aided by extensive wind tunnel testing, have regained most of what was lost through the banning of skirts.

His last major technical innovation was the creation of the dual-chassis car design, in which different parts of the vehicle were given different suspension. The banning of this by the FIA really upset him, and may have precipitated ill health, which was to dog him for the final few years of his life. However, it inspired active suspension, pioneered by Lotus.

Quotes

●Simplify and add lightness.
●You won't catch me driving a race car that I have built.
●...make the suspension adjustable and they will adjust it wrong -- look what they can do to a Weber carburetor in just a few moments of stupidity with a screwdriver.
●To add speed, add lightness.
●Any car which holds together for a whole race is too heavy.
●Accountants are the scorers of industry; they have nothing to do with playing the game.

chapman.jpg

Anthony Colin Bruce Chapman - 9/5/1928 - 16/12/1982
 
Renault reacts to Michelin's quit decision

Following Wednesday's announcement by Michelin that it is to withdraw from F1 at the end of 2006, World Champions Renault have issued the following statement:

"We learn of Michelin's departure with regret, but we respect their decision.

Our technical collaboration in Formula 1 dates back to 1977, and culminated with double championship victory in 2005.

But we enter the new season as world champions, and we are determined to do justice to that status."

Indeed, what of the 2006 season? Does Michelin's planned departure at year's end leave the Renault F1 Team with performance worries for the coming year?

"Not at all," explains Bob Bell. "We go into 2006 as world champions, and we are determined to defend those titles. I have no doubt that Michelin intend to do exactly the same.

"We have already seen enhanced collaboration between the Michelin teams this winter, and a rapid rate of tyre development. We are confident this will continue until the final round of 2006."
 
More RBR2 pictures

RBR2-1.jpg

RBR2-2.jpg

RBR2-3.jpg


Looks pretty nice actually.

Rear is again surprisingly compact. Suppose the V8 is helping there by being 125mm shorter *or something like that*
 
-Mic- said:
Poor Flibster.
Posting all taht and no one cares to reply.

I would have done earlier had I not been at lunch....

Colin's quotes are as relevant today as they were when they were made. I think it's quite safe to say that the sport would be nothing like it is today without his influence.
 
rpstewart said:
I would have done earlier had I not been at lunch....

Colin's quotes are as relevant today as they were when they were made. I think it's quite safe to say that the sport would be nothing like it is today without his influence.

Look at his *and Lotus' in general* input.

Monocoque chassis
Engine as a stressed member
Squashability of bums research *this is true!*
Chapman strut suspension
High level wings
Radiator positioning
Ground effect
Whole team Sponsorship
Composite bodywork
Composite chassis
Active exhausts
Active suspension

Amongst others...

Plus - he went to America and beat the Yanks at the Indy 500. :D

Simon/~Flibster
 
rpstewart said:
Where does the DFV fit into this? Would Ford have commissioned it for anyone other than Lotus?


Doubtfull. Although Ford did ask Lotus if they wanted the engine to be an exclusive deal for them only. They decided to let anyone who wanted one to have one.

Over 20 years and 167 wins later...

DFV still rules as the best F1 engine ever made.

Still in use *although a varient badged as the Zetec R* in 1994 when it won the Drivers Championship in a Bennetton - incidentally the last time a V8 won a F1 championship.

Not bad at all for an engine that took 7 weeks and £100000 to develop.

Simon/~Flibster
 
Flibster said:
Still in use *although a varient badged as the Zetec R* in 1994 when it won the Drivers Championship in a Bennetton - incidentally the last time a V8 won a F1 championship.

Not bad at all for an engine that took 7 weeks and £100000 to develop.

Simon/~Flibster

Last I heard they've put it, or at least major parts of it, back into production to support the Thoroughbred GP series.
 
kicks66 said:
am i right in saying that even though they are going to use v8s they still be pretty mcuh the same speed as before?

Through the twisty bits they should be about the same, maybe even a touch quicker as the shorter engine may lead to shorter more nimble cars, or as we've seen with the RB2 a tighter back end may give better aero grip in the mid to high speed corners.

Down the straights they'll be slower, to begin with they'll be about 10-20% down on horsepower, so maybe 150bhp until they get the revs up. Cossie already have 20K out of theirs so by seasons end I would anticipate the engines being less than 100bhp down on where we are now.

Early testing was giving about a 3s per lap difference between V10s and V8s and most of the V8s were in modified 2005 chassis, once the new cars are ready and properly sorted they'll be much closer to 2005 times.
 
Last edited:
rpstewart said:
Last I heard they've put it, or at least major parts of it, back into production to support the Thoroughbred GP series.

You can buy the major components for it from Cosworth again.

Not quite to the point where you could build a new DFV from new parts - but it's getting close. Kind of like Rolls Royce producing limited numbers of parts for the Merlin and Griffen engines again.

It's a supply and demand - lots of people want the DFV and derivatives running - they can supply the bits.

There's only limited spec parts available though - think it's mostly the 1970 spec thats available.

kicks66 said:
am i right in saying that even though they are going to use v8s they still be pretty mcuh the same speed as before?

They are slower - as of yet the FIA haven't decided on the limits to be placed on the V10's that will be used by Toro Rosso - but my guestimates are that the V8's will be 2 seconds a lap slower at the start of the year.

Where it rains the engine will no longer be as important and they may well be as fast or faster than this year.

Again - there will always be exceptions - slower at high power circuits, not so slow at others. Generally I reckon it will be around 2 seconds though.

Simon/~Flibster
 
Sharknose said:
ROFL at ITV-F1.

This is how BBC reports yesterdays testing.

"Schumacher sets pace in testing"

This is how ITV-F1 reports the same day.

SCHUEY IN A SPIN

Why aren't I suprised ITV went for the more sensentional, tabloid, anti-"that damn German" approach ;) :D

Shorter story, means they can run another story on Jensons dad or Jensons girlfriend or what Jenson had for breakfast prior to testing ;).

Dutch Guy said:
Very compact, almost looks like there isn't even space for an engine and gearbox.

Chop off two cylinders and you can save a bit of space :). The F1 V10's were very compact but with the V8 you also reduce the space required for the engine ancillary components, eg the exhaust system.
 
Richards gives Villeneuve a verbal kicking

Former BAR boss David Richards has launched an outspoken attack against Jacques Villeneuve, dismissing the French/Canadian as "past his sell-by date" and suggesting that he may be a disruptive influence at BMW.

There's no love lost between the pair after their turbulent relationship at BAR culminated in Richards deciding not to offer JV a new deal. Or at least a contract offering a salary in excess of £1.

Villeneuve has not been shy about voicing his contempt for Richards, admitting that he was happy to see him ousted as BAR’s Team Principal.

Although JV accused Richards of orchestrating a whispering campaign against him in the paddock, Richards has remained, in public at least, silent on his former driver. Until now.

"Bluntly, he's past his sell-by, and has been for some time," he told F1-Racing magazine.

"I know that Mario [Theissen, BMW-Sauber's new boss] is retaining Jacques' services, but if I'd been him I wouldn't have even entertained the idea. In a difficult year - and 2006 will definitely be difficult for BMW - the last thing they need is someone like Jacques."

What's more, Richards was insistent that it was a mistake for Sauber to bring back JV into F1 last season.

"I was surprised to see that Peter employed Jacques. It was an odd decision, and it certainly didn’t seem to work out. I sensed there were periods in the middle of the season, and even early on, when Peter's famously calm Swiss exterior showed the extent of his frustration with the Jacques situation."

Damning words; but then again, it should be remembered that Richards is the team boss who gave Crashaholic Takuma Sato a full-time seat in F1 and then offered to give his errant driver a driving lesson based on his golf swing.

And I agree with him tbh. Villeneuve has been frankly terrible since he left Williams *who had the best car that year anyway*.

I think it's shown what he's really capable of.

As for Villeneuve's complaints against Richards - Lets look at the results - wherever he puts his attentions - he wins. Villeneuve couldn't even beat Button in the same car.
 
Not really F1 - but could help their F1 team.

IRL IndyCar - Toyota make withdrawal official

In a move that has been universally expected for several months Toyota has officially announced that 2005 was their final season in the IndyCar Series.
Toyota was originally scheduled to leave after the 2006 season, but the manufacturer stated, “…that decision was expedited one year to allow the IRL to move to a common engine for the upcoming season.”

Curiously, the IndyCar move to a common engine was mostly predicated by Chevrolet's planned withdrawal after 2005 and the rapid departure of the Penske and Ganassi Racing teams from the Toyota camp.

That left Toyota without a front-line team using their already horsepower disadvantaged engines. The proverbial writing was on the wall showing the effort necessary to win races in 2006 would not be worth Toyota continuing to invest in their IndyCar Series program.

“We appreciate the time we've spent in the IndyCar Series,” said Jim Aust, Toyota vice president of motorsports. “In winning the 2003 Indianapolis 500, Toyota earned its greatest motorsports accomplishment and we'll forever cherish that victory. Our gratitude goes out to Tony George and the Indy Racing League for providing us the opportunity to compete in, and win, the greatest spectacle in racing.”

Toyota entered the IndyCar Series in 2003 after building up a successful program in the rival CART series. The manufacturer won the IndyCar Series championship in 2003 with Scott Dixon of Ganassi Racing, and also won the Indianapolis 500 with Gil de Ferran and Penske Racing.

Their fortunes would take a dramatic turn for the worse in 2004 when Honda Racing decided to vigorously fight back with an expensive manufacturer battle. Honda's on track dominance eventually drove both Toyota and Chevrolet from IndyCar racing as the cost of winning began to greatly exceed the value of competing in the sport.
Toyota would still win races on some handling tracks where raw power was not as important, but the loss of engineering powerhouses like Penske and Ganassi meant repeating such successes in 2006 would not be possible.

Scott Dixon scored Toyota's final IndyCar Series victory on the historic road course in Watkins Glen, New York late in the 2005 season.

“We truly appreciate Toyota's participation and service in the IndyCar Series,” said Brian Barnhart, president and chief operating officer for the Indy Racing Leagues. “They have been great partners to the series both on and off the race track.”
 
Back
Top Bottom