2005/2006 F1 News and Testing.

Honda target '100% reliability'

Honda and Jenson Button are both feeling good following their testing in Valencia this week and, despite one engine failure, were pleased with the performance of their new RA106.

Button was the driver who unfortuanely suffered the engine failure but says despite this he feels very happy with what he has seen over the last couple days.

"Overall, the test has been really positive this week so it is unfortunate that we suffered an engine failure on the final day," said Jenson.

"We've been working mainly on long run performance and the consistency has been good. As with all new cars we are just trying to get as much mileage as possible under our belts at the moment but I'm pleased with how the car is shaping up."

Mark Ellis, the teams Chief Engineer, was happy with how the car ran and says the team are keen to get back on the track next week in Jerez.

"It has been another very good test for us this week with the new RA106 cars," said Ellis.

"We have again had to contend with poor weather and track conditions however the cars have proven to be fast and consistent in all conditions. Despite a couple of small issues, we are happy with the reliability of the new car. We look forward to continuing our development programme in Jerez next week."

Engineering Director of Honda Racing Development, Shuhei Nakamoto, said that while the team would have liked a problem free run they were happy with what they got from the testing session.

'We have gained a little more top power and an improved torque curve after this test. Our target is 100% reliability so we still have work to do in the coming weeks, but overall we have made good progress."
 
Monteiro is no fan of V8's

Midland driver Tiago Monteiro has admitted he is not a fan of the V8 engines being introduced in Formula 1 this year.

The new 2.4-litre units have reduced power output from more than 900bhp to 700-750bhp in the interests of keeping speeds in check.

But Monteiro says they are less satisfying to drive than their three-litre predecessors and detract from the essence of grand prix racing.

“Personally, I don’t like them,” he said.

“I think F1 needs to be top of everything: technology, power, everything needs to be maximum.

“Having driven the V10 for a year and then going to the V8, personally I find it a big step down.

“You lose 20 percent of the horsepower so you still have a lot of power – 700-plus bhp – but it’s a shame.”

Despite his reservations, Monteiro stressed that the new breed of engines do not necessarily require less driver skill than the V10s, simply a change in technique.

“[The change to smaller V8s] doesn’t mean the car is easy to drive,” he said.

“It’s a big difference, and people don’t realise how many differences the fact you take off two cylinders makes in all departments.

“I’m talking driving style, set-up, electronics – traction control, anti-lock, diff, all the electronics have to be re-thought – and then tyres.

“The stress on the tyres is probably half what it was with the V10, even thought it’s only 20% less power.

“I think it’s a good thing for Bridgestone, anyway.

“They have a lot of experience with these softer tyres that we will have now that we are allowed to change them again, so it could be a good thing for us.”
 
Muddying the waters

It's worth noting - if we are taking Max Mosley's comments at face value - and at this stage why wouldn't we - that in addition to his belief that it would be "entirely reasonable to offer the manufacturers that join the Formula One world championship no income", the Englishman believes that the manufacturers should get none of the commercial rights income: "because the savings they will be able to make under the 2008 Formula One regulations are very significantly greater than the sort of money they might receive from FOM.

"Savings would be at least £70m and more in most cases," added the Englishman. "This would enable FOM to distribute more money to the independent teams."

The FIA President made this comment to journalist Christian Sylt in the same interview as he made the earlier comment, however the quote was not used in the article in the Evening Standard.

There is a long-term feeling in F1, both in the paddock, and on internet forums, that Mosley and the FIA favour Ferrari, a claim that the Englishman has always denied.

The flames were re-ignited when the rule changes for 2006 were announced, particularly the re-introduction of tyre changes during Grands Prix, a move which many believe was done purely for the benefit of one team.

Following Mosley's comments, much is being made of recent comments made by Ferrari President, Luca di Montezemolo, who insists that the Italian team is a "private entity" and not a manufacturer.

It all depends how one defines "private entity" and "manufacturer", however, despite di Montezemolo's claim that Ferrari is self-sustaining and doesn't receive any funding from FIAT, it was 'Gruppo Ferrari Maserati' which was one of the founding members, and driving force, behind the Grand Prix World Championship (GPWC), along with fellow-manufacturers BMW, Renault and DaimlerChrysler.

Famously, and without warning, the Italian manufacturer jumped ship in January 2005 and signed up to Bernie Ecclestone's new Concorde Agreement, to be later joined by WilliamsF1, MF1, Red Bull and Toro Rosso.

The three other manufacturers behind the GPWC were subsequently joined by Honda and Toyota, and thus the Grand Prix Manufacturers' Association (GPMA) was born.

It's worth noting that the unpublished quote, particularly the comment; "manufacturers that join the Formula One World Championship" would receive no income, could suggest a let-out for Ferrari, which - if it is seen as a manufacturer - has already joined.

Either way, at a time when it appeared that a solution was close, Mosley's comments will have further muddied the water.

Mosley and Ecclestone have always publicly dismissed the threat of a breakaway series, however, it is known that the sport's commercial rights holder takes the GPMA far more seriously than he would have us believe.
 
JAPAN has a quick female racer eying F1

JAPANESE sensation and former "race queen" Keiko Ihara is set to use her second season on the tough British Formula Three circuit as a springboard into the elite men's world of Formula One.

Ihara has been making her mark on the masculine sport since becoming a driver in 1999 and ending her days parading in leotards and swimsuits around race circuits.

With promises of a better car, the 32-year-old is hoping to take the Formula Three podium for the first time since her debut there last year.

"If I constantly finish in the top 10, even when my machine is in bad condition, I will get an offer for F1 tests for sure," Ihara, who would become one of only a handful of women to ever compete in F1, said.

No other woman is lined up for the F1 or British F3 series this season.

"I definitely want to ride in F1 in the near future," she said.

The Tokyo native had a reasonable but not spectacular debut last year in British F3, which has been a spawning ground for F1 greats such as Ayrton Senna and Mika Hakkinen.

She finished in the top 10 in six of her 22 races with her best result eighth place.

"This year, I have been promised a better machine within the team," Ihara said.

Trevor Carlin, the boss of Carlin Motorsports, which has signed Ihara for a second season, has promised her a "stronger system" to back her .

"I will definitely not bow to my teammates this year."

Carlin said: "Keiko showed great determination and dedication last year and I am positive she will do us proud in her second year."

The feisty Japanese driver also defended her debut, pointing out that it took the late Brazilian champion Senna three years to win the British F3 championship after his debut.

Her first F3 season, following six years of duels with male drivers on lesser tours in Asia, Britain and France, proved to be a steep learning curve with a lot of body building to cope with the rising G-force.

"I crashed with a British driver early in the season and he shouted at me that an Asian woman doesn't belong here," Ihara recalled.

"I could not talk back. But I bumped him into a spin in the next race after securing my way out," she laughed.

"I had no more trouble afterwards because I was always ahead of him on the starting grid.

"It is definitely a minus for being an Asian because it is a European-born sport. They didn't see me as an equal. Besides they thought I would not finish a race because I was a woman.

"But now they treat me differently," she said, gearing up for the year's first F3 race on April 16.

Several women have competed in F1 in the 56 years of the championship, with only Italian Lella Lombardi posting a top six finish at the 1975 Spanish Grand Prix.

And she's quite cute as well... ;)

http://www.keikoihara.com/

Simon/~Flibster
 
Last edited:
New McLaren is getting better - Montoya

Blighted by reported engine problems, the new McLaren Mercedes is getting better, Juan Pablo Monotya says. The Colombian spent three days testing the new car last week at Jerez working on long runs. He did, however suffer an engine failure on Friday and had some more hydraulic problems.

"The distances we are covering is allowing us to complete some key programmes with the car and I am looking forward to continuing this process next week in Jerez," Montoya said. "The car is getting better the more we run it and develop it, and the team are doing a really good job. We have had a couple of technical issues this week, but this is why we test and everything like this helps us learn more about the car."
 
Cosworth V8 is reliable, will get stronger

The only independent engine manufacturer on the F1 grid, Cosworth's V8 power plant has been running strongly and reliably in the back of the new Williams FW28. The team completed a five-day test of the new car this week and encountered no problems related to the engine. There are also upgrades planned before the first race of the season in Bahrain.

"The Cosworth CA2006 V8 experienced no engine installation or cooling issues when installed in the new Williams FW28," said Simon Corbyn, head of F1 race engineering, Cosworth. "This is quite an achievement given the incredibly tight packaging and demonstrates how effectively the Williams and Cosworth engineers have been working together during the design process. We have not yet validated all the Bahrain GP specification components at the track, so we will therefore have some further engine reliability and performance updates to evaluate in Jerez next week."
 
GPMA 'surprised' by Mosley's plan

The manufacturer-backed Formula 1 teams have dismissed Max Mosley’s proposal that they should be denied a share of the sport’s commercial revenue after 2007.

The alliance of carmakers which have not yet signed up to F1 beyond the end of the current Concorde Agreement – Renault, BMW, Mercedes, Toyota and Honda – suggested that Mosley’s remarks strayed beyond his remit as president of the FIA.

“In view of the European Union ruling on the role of the governing body, we are surprised by Mr Mosley’s comments,” a spokesman for the Grand Prix Manufacturers Association (GPMA) was quoted as saying by Reuters.

Following a protracted anti-trust investigation concluded by the European Commission in October 2001, the FIA agreed to confine itself to a regulatory role and not become involved in F1’s commercial affairs.

The GPMA said it will continue its ongoing negotiations with Bernie Ecclestone without regard to Mosley’s proposal.

“The GPMA remains committed to its strategy and will continue discussions with the commercial rights holder,” the spokesman said.
 
Marmorini offers better V10 restrictions

Toyota engine chief Luca Marmorini believes that a change of approach by the FIA to limiting V10 engines in Formula One this year could bring an end to the continued controversy over Scuderia Toro Rosso.

With several teams still unhappy about the equivalency formula, set in place to peg the performance of Toro Rosso's V10 engines behind V8s, Marmorini believes it may be better for the FIA to abandon rev limits and air restrictors in favour of an engine mapping solution.

The Ferrari team have used engine mapping during their testing of restricted V10 engines this year to better simulate the characteristics of V8 power-units.

"There are two ways to intervene on the V10s: either to adopt the FIA-mandated restriction, or to modify the engine mapping," Marmorini was quoted as saying in Gazzetta dello Sport.

"In the latter case, which is the one adopted by Ferrari, you are able to thoroughly and completely reproduce the behaviour of an eight-cylinder engine.

"By working on the mapping, you can manage to choke the engine at low regimes too. So, you don't get significant differences in lap times between eight and ten cylinder engines."
 
First CG image of the Super Aguri race car....

It's not a good one....

SuperAguri-1.jpeg
 
6thElement said:
Don't lie, you got your niece to knock that up in MS Paint. :p

Certainly looks that way doesn't it. :D Sadly - no niece's...or nephews.

It's not exactly 'state of the art' is it? ;)

Anyway...

Head: Bridgestone made an error in '05.

Patrick Head has said Bridgestone had no option but to look for new teams for the 2006 Formula One season after 'getting it wrong' last season.

Although the Japanese tyre supplier had three teams on its books in 2005, two of those - Jordan and Minardi - were running at the rear of the field leaving Ferrari as the sole front-running outfit on Bridgestone rubber and the team responsible for doing most of the development work.

It meant that the Michelin shod teams ended up dominating the season, with victory for Michael Schumacher in the farcical United States Grand Prix the only win for Bridgestone during the year.

With that in mind, Bridgestone has expanded its list of clients for 2006, with Toyota, Williams and the new Super Aguri F1 added to its line-up and Head said it would prove to be beneficial to Bridgestone for the new season

"For Bridgestone, they understood that they made a strategic error last season in only having one leading team, so it was important for them to get more than one competitive team and now they have three in Ferrari, Toyota and us," the WilliamsF1 Director of Engineering told Crash.net Radio.

"I think they realise that they are learning a hell of lot faster now than they were when they were just supplying Ferrari as a top team and I think that it will benefit Ferrari but it will benefit us as well."

Recent Formula One testing has seen both Williams and Toyota carrying out extensive tyre developement ahead of the new season.
 
Piquet slams 'rubbish' GP Masters

Former Formula One World Champion Nelson Piquet has slammed the Grand Prix Masters series, branding it "rubbish" and saying he would never take part in the formula.

Piquet retired from Formula One at the end of the 1991 season, and in 1992 suffered leg injuries in practice for the Indianapolis 500.

The 53-year-old outspoken Brazilian is potentially a perfect candidate for the new GP Masters series, which features retired Grand Prix drivers over the age of 45.

The inaugural race at South Africa last November was won by Piquet's arch rival from his Formula One days, Nigel Mansell. Second place went to Brazilian Emerson Fittipaldi.

But Piquet has belittled his former colleagues for taking part in the event and claimed the only motivation to race in GP Masters is financial.

"I would never do anything like that, because my time as a professional race driver is gone and I have my job," Piquet told Italy's Autosprint magazine.

"That's a series for people with no money who are hoping to gain it back somehow. Beyond that, I don't see any reason to race in such rubbish. After having raced in F1, you go back at 50 years of age at the wheel of a car that looks like it? No way."

Piquet added that he has no financial incentives to go back to racing, the Brazilian claiming his satellite tracking company has made him richer than he ever was.

"My company has grown immensely: 1,025 employees, with a turnover of over 200 million dollars," Piquet said.

"Personally, I'm making a lot more than when I used to race in F1. In the next five years, I will gain double what Michael Schumacher has made in his entire career."

Sorry?
Who mentioned it was about money? Many of them are doing it for fun.

He's the first person to mention money with it tbh. Then going on to say that he's going to earn more in the next five years than Schumacher...

Not sure if he meant to come over like a rectal orrifice - but he did.

Simon/~Flibster
 
Piquet: Jr needs GP2 title to enter F1

Former Formula One World Champion Nelson Piquet believes his son, Nelson Piquet Jr, is ready to race in Formula One - but he will only be able to enter the sport if he first wins the GP2 championship.

Piquet Jr only finished eighth in the inaugural GP2 season, after taking one win and five podium finishes - but also retiring in a third of the races held.

The 20-year-old Brazilian is considered one of the upcoming talents making his way through the lower formulae, winning the British Formula Three title in 2004.

Piquet's rival and GP2 champion Nico Rosberg - also a son of a former Formula One champion - will make his Formula One debut with Williams this season, while GP2 runner-up Heikki Kovalainen will be Renault F1's test and reserve driver.

Father Piquet said his son had the opportunity to become a Formula One test driver - but not on conditions that are acceptable to the former F1 champion.

"Obviously I'd like to see him in F1 but he comes from a disastrous GP2 season and the situation is complex," Piquet Sr. said of his son in an interview with Autosprint magazine.

"We have spoken with various teams to sign a test driver contract, but the conditions they propose are unacceptable.

"They don't guarantee any length [of running] in kilometres, they never speak about driving, but only demand the availability of the driver. On top of that, they demand a six-year contract length without any promise on their side of letting him race or drive.

"With these premises, I told everyone to *urinate* off. Now Nelsinho needs to think about winning in order to get the opportunity to enter a team directly as race driver. It's the only serious and realistic way I know to get in F1."

He's still coming over as a rectal orrifice...

Simon/~Flibster
 
MF1 to lose Toyota engines for 2007?

Midland's MF1 team could lose Toyota power at the end of this year.

It is well-known speculation in F1 circles that Williams is eyeing the affections of the Japanese outfit, for a sort of 'semi works' pairing in 2007 and beyond.

"You have to ask Toyota about this," said Midland's team principal Colin Kolles last week, when asked about the Williams gossip.

"At the moment we are bound together even more than last year, so for me there is no issue."

Williams' co-owner and engineering boss Patrick Head, however, has mused that the team's current arrangement - a Cosworth engine that comes at a cost - is not ideal.

"Our mechanism for raising money is the same as everyone else," the Briton told crash.net, referring to private sponsorship, "so that isn't a position that can continue into the future."

Head said: "We are looking at all the possibilities for making sure we have a good engine into the future."
 
Red Bull seeking overheating fix

A cooling flaw in Red Bull's new RB2 racer should be fixed with a new bodywork package.

That's the reassurance of Technical Director Mark Smith, whose team admitted that testing laps have been limited so far because the Ferrari engine was overheating the new car.

"We will be testing the new elements... later this month," Smith said.

He confessed that the technical team is unsure about how such a flaw was allowed to creep into the car's design, but reckons the bodywork has 'solved the problem' even if it will only be tested shortly before the cars are shipped off to Bahrain.

Smith denied that the lack of extended running at recent tests has put Red Bull behind.

He insisted: "Ferrari have been running the same engine ... so they have a good understanding of its durability."
 
Toyota's Aero update to move them forwards

Ralf Schumacher has urged F1 observers to assess the '06 pecking order when Toyota have brand new bodywork up and running later this month.

With the new TF106 car, the German and his colleagues have recently looked little more than potential midfield runners in winter testing, with Renault, Honda and Ferrari seemingly dominating the top order.

But an all-new aerodynamic specification will be debuted at Barcelona later in February, and could also be concurrently run at an Italian venue in the very same week, according to speculation.

Late last year, Toyota became the first of formula one's eleven teams to run a 2006 car, while the plan was always to launch a second aero package prior to the first race.

After that, a 'B' car is expected in Monaco (May).

30-year-old Ralf Schumacher said last week in Valencia: "When the new package arrives in the coming tests, we will see how competitive we are going to be.

"Aerodynamically, the car's not ready yet."

Toyota will test at Jerez this week.
 
Aguri Suzuki expects a tough start

Aguri Suzuki admits that his new 'Super Aguri' formula one team is not entirely ready to tackle its debut season.

The 45-year-old Japanese, who himself raced in 88 grands prix and even tasted a podium in 1990, told the 'Daily Yomiuru' publication that sitting on the pitwall in Bahrain next month will be a 'dream come true'.

"I had many sleepless nights (recently), but not anymore," Suzuki, whose Honda backed team has been given an official green light, said.

"When I finished my career as a driver, I hoped I could come back at the age of 45 or so."

However, the team's first car - SA05 - will actually be a reworked Arrows A23 of 2002, while the bespoke SA06 is readied for a European debut in mid-May.

Aguri Suzuki conceded: "We lack preparation. Things never go well at first.

"But in the Japanese Grand Prix (on October 8), we're sure to achieve moderate success."
 
Bahrain expect F1 sell out

Bahrain is expecting a sell out crowd for its first season opening Grand Prix of the season next month.

With Australia taking a break from the calendar's first slot due to the Commonwealth Games, Bahrain has been promoted from round three to round one for 2006.

A spokeswoman for the Sakhir circuit said she did not know exact figures, but expected higher numbers than last year.

"If we compare this year's sales to last year's six weeks before the event," she told the TradeArabia publication, "there is a 15 percent increase."

Hoteliers in the area, however, have come under fire for exploiting the accommodation shortage by raising normal room fees by between 45 and 75 percent.

One single and double room for radio journalists for three nights, according to TradeArabia, was costing them about $1400.

The circuit's hotel manager, however, defended the rate rises.

"The (hotel fee) structure used in Bahrain is an international one," said Abdulrahman Qarata.
 
Mosley defends manufacturer money plan

As Formula One awaits the next move from the manufacturers, following FIA President Max Mosley's suggestion that they should not be given a share of the revenue from F1, the Englishman has defended the idea.

Talking to the BBC, Mosley repeated a comment made to journalist Christian Silt last week, but which was subsequently omitted from the article carried in the London Evening Standard.

Referring to the new rules proposed for 2008, and the cost savings that this would mean to the manufacturers and teams, Mosley said it was; "quite logical to give the money they would have got to the smaller, independent teams to raise the whole standard of the competition".

He admitted that the matter has already been discussed with the sport's Commercial Rights holder, Bernie Ecclestone, who, according to Mosley, was "thinking about it".

The Englishman insists that despite the uproar that these proposals will provoke from both manufacturers and manufacturer-back teams, that a deal which will prevent a breakaway series is at hand.

"I think three of the five want to accept what's on the table and then the other two are still arguing," he said.

Regarding the GPMA's claim that, following a European Union anti-trust probe, the FIA has no right to involve itself in the sport's commercial affairs and is only to be concerned with regulatory matters, Mosley said: "They seem to think we shouldn't be saying anything because we don't do the commercial side of the sport.

"But of course they are misunderstanding the situation, which is we mustn't profit from any of the different championships we regulate.

"But that doesn't stop us from saying about any particular championship that the people who have a great deal of money should get less and the people who have less money should get more."
 
The secrets behind Renault's V8 engine

The RS26 is a pure expression of Renault technology. Inspired by the solutions that brought world championship success with the RS25 V10 last year, the engineers have exploited the opportunity offered by regulation change, to push the limits of the rules in producing a front-running Formula 1 engine. After completing thousands of miles on the dyno, the V8 impressed with its reliability as soon as it hit the track. In its first three tests, the engine has completed over 5000 km – an increase of more than 15% relative to 2005 at the same stage. Its designers sat down to explain some of the key points of this new engine.

The RS26 Programme:

Léon Taillieu, Project Manager: “Engine design is all about organisation and planning. In modern F1, that is what can make the difference. We rely heavily on our computer tools, which allow us to limit the risk of error. We also conducted specific testing on the V10, which was of significant benefit to the programme.”

Rob White, Technical Director: “The regulations now impose several limits on the engine builders: as well as the V8 architecture and 2.4L capacity, specified limits for the location of the centre of gravity, a maximum bore, and the use of specific materials for certain components. Variable inlet trumpets are no longer legal either. However, the V8 design has not brought about a revolution in the technology we use: the RS26 and RS25 engines have the same DNA.”

Vibrations:

Léon Taillieu: “For every engine, one must draw a distinction between internal and external vibrations. The first category are primarily the torsional vibrations, that are caused by the engine’s moving parts. Understanding these vibrations is crucial to the engine’s basic reliability, and they depend on, among other factors, the firing order of the engine – which is itself a major performance factor. We therefore must choose the firing order that gives us the best reliability-performance compromise.

“The second order of vibrations, concerns those of the static parts of the engine, that are transmitted to components around the engine, and these can be minimised by the way in which the crankshaft is balanced. In the car, the driver and chassis components notice this second order of vibration. The compromise we have selected with our V8 does not bring a superior level of vibration to those we experienced with the V10.”

Performance:

Léon Taillieu: “The average revs over a lap will be around 400 to 500 rpm higher than with the V10. That is a significant difference. Furthermore, because there will be less power than in 2005, the time spent at full throttle will also be higher. We will have to take this into account when deciding how to use the engine over a race weekend.”

Rob White: “The power loss relative to 2005 is around 20% - in line with the reduction in capacity. The torque levels are also lower, because we can no longer use variable inlet trumpets. There is now a more pronounced performance ‘peak’ in the rev range, either side of which the loss of power is quite significant. To be quick, we need to stay on this peak as much as possible. In terms of engine speed, I expect maximum revs at the start of the season will be similar to those seen with the V10, and will climb progressively through the year.”

The consequences at the track:

Denis Chevrier, Trackside Operations Manager: “In terms of our trackside operations, the main changes are down to the new qualifying format, and the possibility to change tyres during the race. With our colleagues in Enstone, we have built new programmes for how we will run during the race weekends: how should we tackled the three-part qualifying session? When should we do our tyre evaluations? The regulations change how we use the car, and we have tried to respond to this in the best way possible.”

Reliability:

Léon Taillieu: “Reliability is our foremost priority. It was a strength of ours in 2005, and must remain so in 2006. We have put all the necessary systems in place, to achieve our objectives in this area.”

Rob White: “As always, we are aiming for zero defect reliability. We have been given a new challenge, and our job is to meet is as best we can. In general, the V8 will run at higher revs. This could pose problems for the reliability, but it has been taken account since the engine’s initial design. So, there are no specific problems for reliability: the RS26 has been designed to be used in a different way to the V10.”
 
Horses for courses

It is entirely possible that the company which manages several of Britain's leading (horse) racing tracks could end up running Silverstone, host of the British Formula One Grand Prix.

Northern Racing plc, which runs racecourses at Brighton, Chepstow, Hereford, Sedgefield and Uttoxeter claims, in a statement released this morning, that it is likely to be given the job of running the Northamptonshire track for the next 25-years, providing the move is approved by member of the British Racing Drivers' Club (BRDC).

Further details of the deal will be made to members at an Extraordinary General Meeting of the BRDC which takes place later this month (22nd).

The BRDC is already facing problems as it attempts to sell members the idea of a deal with developer, St Modwen, which is seeking to carry out a major redevelopment of the former airfield, with proposals for hotels, residential properties and even its own rail station.

A group of members opposing the plan - which would see St Modwen given a 150-year lease - have called the Extraordinary General Meeting.

It's understood that St Modwen is a sister company to Northern Racing plc, which should further inflame the BRDC 'rebels'.
 
Back
Top Bottom