2005/2006 F1 News and Testing.

J1nxy said:
Personally I'd have prefered they take a year to prepare the car properly. If they fall foul to the 107% rule at most races then surely they would have been better off not there wasting their money when they could have done with more testing and preperation.

Steve

What 107% rule?

It was dropped when the single lap qualifying came in.

Simon/~Flibster
 
Ferrari president confident for season

Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo has said he is confident his team are in good shape for the start of the season - despite recent concerns about reliability.

The team suffered some niggling mechanical problems in testing at Bahrain recently, but di Montezemolo is hopeful that they are now on top of those issues after lengthy runs at Mugello today.

"These days we've been a bit unlucky with the weather, but this morning Schumacher simulated a GP successfully and we hope we can close the preparation for the season in these last two days," he said at the Geneva Motorshow today.

"However, this isn't a county fair. So even though I say we must win, it will always be difficult.

"Regarding Ferrari's reliability, I'm old school: an F1 car must first of all be quick, and then of course, it's important not to break down. So I'm happy the long run test ended successfully."

Di Montezemolo has also proclaimed the high hopes he has for Schumacher to hit back in style - and mocked any suggestions that the seven-times champion was getting too old for F1.

"I expect Schumacher to win the championship, forget about ending his career," he added.

"He looks like a new guy. The way I see him motivated and the way he wants to carry out the tests himself make him look like a young boy. I'm also happy with Massa, who's doing very well."
 
Aero developments for the 248 F1

A brand new nose and wing for Ferrari's 248 F1 is worth up to three tenths of a second per lap, a specialist magazine says.

Auto Motor Und Sport in Germany published photos of the new feature, which has rid the front wing of the little ‘mini wing’, replacing it with a curvy scoop. Also appearing on the Ferrari wing for the first time at Mugello is an extra element, extending from the nose to the top of the end plates.

The magazine said Ferrari's speed boost should put the Maranello based team on a par with Honda, just behind pacesetter Renault.

Technical director Ross Brawn, meanwhile, was quoted as saying that the 248's widely reported clutch problems will be solved.
 
Seiko watches join Honda F1

The Honda Racing F1 Team has announced a new agreement with the Seiko Watch Corporation which extends its existing partnership to cover the 2006 and 2007 seasons. In addition to being the official Team Watch Partner, Seiko have also concluded a personal agreement with Honda Racing F1 Team driver Jenson Button, through which Jenson will endorse Seiko's watches and become an ambassador of the Seiko brand.

Synonymous with precision time-keeping, the partnership with Seiko has been an excellent asset to the Honda Racing F1 Team since the brand entered Formula One with the team in 2005. The new agreement will build on this partnership which has proven an exceptional marketing platform for the Seiko Sportura watch collection. For 2006, the Sportura series will be central to Seiko's marketing campaigns in its major international markets.

The Seiko branding will continue to appear on the Honda Racing F1 Team's clothing, including driver race suits, as part of the team's Racing Revolution livery. In addition, from the 2006 season the Seiko brand will feature on the pit-stop lollipop during Grand Prix weekends and also on Jenson Button's helmet to reflect his personal partnership with Seiko.

Nick Fry, Honda CEO
"I am extremely proud to confirm the extension to our relationship with Seiko for a further two seasons. The association with such a technologically innovative company fits well with the Honda design led philosophy and we are already working on new designs with Seiko for their Sportura range. We are also very pleased to announce the personal sponsorship with Jenson, who is a big fan of the Seiko brand, and I'm sure his presence will prove a valuable marketing tool for Seiko. This is a very exciting time for the team as we prepare for the start of the new F1 season and we look forward to celebrating our on-track successes with Seiko this year."

Shinji Hattori, President and CEO of Seiko Watch Corporation
"We are delighted to renew our agreement with the Honda Racing F1 Team. Both parties share a passion for engineering excellence and we look forward to building our partnership through the development of new products as well as through shared marketing programmes. We wish the team and Jenson Button every success in 2006."
 
Berger doesn't want Bernie's job

Toro Rosso part-owner Gerhard Berger has ruled himself out of the running to one day succeed Bernie Ecclestone as 'F1 supremo'.

Although Bernie, the 75-year-old Englishman, appears in excellent health, relentless speculation puts men like David Richards and Flavio Briatore on a shortlist to steer the pinnacle of motor sport in a post-Ecclestone era.

But 46-year-old Berger, who started 210 grands prix in the 80s and 90s and then was a BMW director until 2003, told the 'Kicker' sports magazine that he cannot see himself in Ecclestone's white shirt.

'It's too big a job for me,' F1's newest team co-owner smiled. 'Anyway, I am of the opinion that Ecclestone and Max Mosley are doing an excellent job.

'And I hope Bernie leads F1 for many years to come.'
 
Bahrain expects grand prix protests

Up to nine separate protests are being planned to coincide with Bahrain's '06-opening grand prix next week.

The 'Gulf Daily News' newspaper said four motorcades, four demonstrations and one rally will take place between next Friday and Sunday - the duration of the third such F1 event in the Arabian Gulf.

The protests, of which at least one will be staged near the Sakhir circuit on race day, will 'demand the release' of men arrested in violent demonstrations in January, the newspaper wrote.

Last week, it was reported that western countries including America and Australia had issued terrorist warnings for Bahrain, advising tourists not to travel to the country.

But one Bahrain activist said: 'We don't want to disturb the events of Formula One.

'We are not going to do anything that's not peaceful.'
 
Honda is most reliable '06 team - study

Honda, an outside tip for championship glory, has been the most reliable formula one team of the 2006 pre-season. While a similar analysis named the Brackley based outfit as the biggest testers, 'Auto Motor Und Sport' now reveals that the Japan-owned camp topped F1's eleven teams in a study of those least likely to break down this year.

With an average of 438 kilometres on a single test day, the German magazine lists Honda ahead of F1 rival and second most reliable team Renault, which clocks up an average 399km.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Toro Rosso - with a development of last year's Red Bull car and a V10 engine - came in third (376km), ahead of BMW (355) and Toyota (294).

Ominously, '05 runner up McLaren is just sixth of the eleven teams, with an average of less than 300km per test day, but Ferrari fared even worse, collecting just 278 km per day to finish eighth.

Williams amassed 280km per winter test day, according to Auto Motor Und Sport, MF1 came next (272), then Red Bull (175) and Super Aguri (173). '

'I feel very comfortable going into the first race,'' Honda's Rubens Barrichello said last
week.
 
MF1 complete second MF16 shakedown

The MF1 Racing team on Tuesday completed the shakedown of the second MF16 car they will take to the Bahrain Grand Prix next week.

Midland team's progress, however, was hindered by the poor weather at the Silverstone circuit, where three drivers were in action for the squad.

Tiago Monteiro was joined by testers Markus Winkelhock and Giorgio Mondini, who completed 11, 12 and 13 laps respectively.

Winkelhock was the quickest of the three with a best time of 1:37.350, ahead of Mondini's 1:44.178. Monteiro did not set a time.

"Unfortunately, we weren't able to do much hard running today, as it was freezing cold and actually snowed quite a bit," said Monteiro. "But we did manage to shake down the new car, test out the new gearbox and practice some pit stops and refueling, so it was a pretty useful test.

"As usual, the mechanical components and team members performed flawlessly. Now, everyone is excited and getting ready for the first race in two weeks. Personally, I can say that I'm really looking forward to being in a warm, dry climate again."
 
Theissen explains difference between V10 and V8

The decision to switch from V10 to V8 engines in Formula One was made at the end of 2004, leaving the engine specialists to focus their efforts over 2005 on the new regulations. 2006 sees the culmination of the switch-over phase.

As BMW Motorsport Director Mario Theissen explains: "The development of a V8 powerplant for Formula One represented a huge challenge for our engineers – especially given the relatively short amount of time at their disposal. The V8 is a totally different concept to the V10. The drop in output is roughly proportional to the 20 percent reduction in displacement. I would therefore expect lap times to climb by an average of one to two seconds. The reduced output on tap for the drivers means the cars will spend significantly more time per lap under peak loads. Reliability is top priority. We can't wait for the serious action to get under way in Bahrain on 12th March. Only then will we get an impression of who's really been doing their homework."

Differences

Although the V8 with the now compulsory cylinder angle of 90 degrees may look like a sawn-off V10, technically it is an entirely separate concept with its own specific requirements. The V8 has a distinct firing sequence and demands a fundamentally different crankshaft design. Whereas a 72-degree offset crankshaft was used in BMW's V10 Formula One engine, V8 powerplants can feature crankshafts with either four throws spaced at 90 degrees or four throws spaced at 180 degrees. Standard production engines are fitted with 90-degree crankshaft variants due to their better dynamic attributes, but a 180-degree crankshaft is favoured in racing car engine design. The improved performance this allows offsets the disadvantages in terms of dynamics.

Indeed, mechanical dynamics and vibrations represent a particularly critical area of development for the new generation of Formula One engines. The V8 units have different firing sequences and intervals from their V10 predecessors, which leads to a totally different situation in terms of vibrations. The V10 entered a critical area in terms of vibrations between 12,000 rpm and 14,000 rpm. However, this was not an issue as the engine did not spend much time in this rev band and smoothed itself out again once the driver stepped up the revs. And, since that was where it spent the majority of its time, vibrations were not a worry. A V8, on the other hand, is not so well off. Its vibration curve enters critical territory later than the V10 – from approximately 16,000 rpm – and continues to climb from there. It is therefore no longer possible to think in terms of getting through a difficult patch and everything will be all right. Now, the problem of constantly increasing vibrations has to be confronted head on. If you don't get a handle on vibrations, they will eat into the service life of the engine and multiply the loads exerted on chassis components. In order to get on top of this problem, the calculation and analysis of each individual engine component has to be totally reliable. However, analysis of the individual components is only part of a bigger challenge. Determining how they work with and against each other in simulations of the overall system is the main task.

Restrictions

Reduced mass should mean less in the way of "bad vibrations". However, the regulations have sensibly nipped any natural tendency among the teams to reach straight for exotic – and expensive – ultra-light materials in the bud. The engineers work with conventional titanium and aluminium alloys, as stipulated in the regulations. The new V8 has to be heavier than its predecessor, even though the 2005 engine had two extra cylinders. This season's powerplants must tip the scales at no less than 95 kilograms. This should include the intake system up to and including the air filter, fuel rail and injectors, ignition coils, sensors and wiring, alternator, coolant pumps and oil pumps. It does not include liquids, exhaust manifolds, heat protection shields, oil tanks, accumulators, heat exchangers and the hydraulic pump.

Added to which, the new regulations stipulate that the engine's centre of gravity must be at least 165 millimetres above the lower edge of the oil sump. The experts had previously managed to lower the ten-cylinder engine's centre of gravity to the benefit of the car's handling. However, the longitudinal and lateral position of the V8's centre of gravity has to be in the geometric centre of the engine (+/-50 millimetres). For the technical commission, checking that everything is in order no longer consists of a simple weighing process. Now, making sure that the rules have been observed involves weighing on two levels and making calculations according to the lever principle.

Previously a closely guarded secret, the dimensions of the cylinder bore are now limited to a maximum 98 millimetres. The gap between the cylinders is also set out in the rulebook – at 106.5 millimetres (+/- 0.2 mm). The central axis of the crankshaft must not lie any less than 58 millimetres above the reference plane.

Another critical change in the regulations is the ban on variable intake systems. Known as "trumpets", these systems could previously be used to optimise the car's torque curve. The fixed duct lengths will now make achieving good engine driveability a more exacting challenge. The teams will have to strike a compromise between maximum power and good driveability. Where the best compromise for the pipe lengths is to be found depends on various factors. The track layout and the weather, for example, both play a role. The teams will favour one set of intake pipe lengths for circuits with long straights – like Monza, Indianapolis and Spa – where power is critical, and a different selection for twistier grand prix tracks such as Budapest and Monaco, where driveability relegates raw power to the back seat. The same applies in wet weather. The air intakes are, by definition, part of the engine and are included in its 95-kilogram maximum overall weight, but they can also be changed up to qualifying.

Joining variable intake systems on the black list are variable exhaust systems and variable valve control systems. The power supply to the engine electrics and electronics is limited to a maximum 17 volts and the fuel pump now has to be mechanically operated. Only an actuator may now be used to activate the throttle valve system. With the exception of the electric auxiliary pumps in the petrol tank, all sub-components must now be driven mechanically and directly via the engine.

The story in numbers

-It takes 3 men 3 days to put together an engine
-200 engines are used for trials, tests and grands prix
-8 million ignitions per race
-1,500 CAD drawings before the engine’s GP debut
-Maximum piston acceleration: 10,000 g
-Maximum piston speed: 40 metres per second
-Average piston speed: 26 metres per second
-A piston accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 0.3 thousandths of a second
-3 tonnes of force is exerted on the connecting rod
-Maximum temperature at exhaust: 950 degrees
-Maximum air temperature in pneumatic system: 250 degrees
 
ashtray_head said:
nice post Simon

Tad complicated that innit?

It's not the easiest thing to understand really is it. :D

Biggest change to the way they drive will be the fixed trumpets...Power could get very peaky now.

Simon/~Flibster
 
ashtray_head said:
might mean that we see some more overtaking???

if someone has gone for a more balanced trumpet they could be able to get the power down earlier and more efficiently as someone else that set up for max power and maybe get along side the said peaky boy?


does that make sense?? :confused:

Possibly..

However - it could also mean that like with a turbo engine - no power until a certain point - then the full 700bhp - then nothing again...

Would make driving a bit harder for the drivers. :D
 
Montagny joins Super Aguri for Bahrain and Malaysia

Super Aguri today confirms that former Renault F1 test and development driver Franck Montagny has signed a contract with the team to be its third driver for the opening two rounds of the 2006 F1 season.

Franck will be on-stand by as third driver for the team at the Bahrain and Malaysian Grands Prix whilst also providing valuable F1 experience and technical knowledge to the fledgling team.

Could be usefull for them.
 
Prodrive to build F1-spec factory

Prodrive's expected entry into Grand Prix racing in 2008 has moved a step closer, with the team announcing on Wednesday plans to build a Formula One-spec factory in Warwickshire.

The announcement, which comes after autosport.com revealed on Monday that Prodrive boss David Richards is on the verge of giving the green light to his F1 operation, will see the company develop a 200-acre facility at Honiley.

The hope is the site will include new offices, design studios, R&D laboratories and a conference centre. A Prodrive statement also said: "It could also become the home for a new British Formula One team."

Plans for the site, which will become known as 'Fulcrum', are currently subject to planning permission but the hope is that work can begin early next year.

Richards said: "The British automotive and motorsport industries are coming under increasing pressure from competition overseas. By developing the Fulcrum, we can provide high level technical skills and resources which will help the region's vehicle manufacturers and motorsport teams succeed and, at the same time, encourage more inward investment to the West Midlands."

Speculation about Richards' plans grew this week when autosport.com revealed that he had held talks with FIA president Max Mosley and F1 commercial boss Bernie Ecclestone about plans for the sport from 2008.

"It is also understood that the Subaru World Rally Team's former performance director David Lapworth is involved in the plans for the Formula One operation at Honiley.

Richards himself has made no secret of his desire to move Prodrive into F1. He said at the Autosport International Show in January: "I would not say it is unfinished business, but Prodrive is a motorsport business and that is at the heart of everything that we do.

"We are involved in most aspects of it, but we are currently not involved in F1 - although we do supply some components.

"I will only go there (into F1) when the situation allows us to be competitive and to make a profit - and the changes coming for 2008 might allow that to come to fruition."

Oooooh.....

Dave Richard has been nothing but successfull when running his own team...

prodrive.jpg


Looks a nice design as well tbh.
 
Last edited:
Mosley urges carmakers to commit to F1

FIA president Max Mosley has written to Formula One's manufacturers today urging them to commit their future to the sport before entries to the 2008 championship close later this month.

At the same time, Mosley has warned them they will be frozen out of rules talks if they miss the deadline.

Mosley unveiled his idea for the early deadline for 2008 entries last month, but his plans for the seven-day 'window of opportunity' have now been formally put to the teams in a letter, a copy of which has been obtained by autosport.com.

He is hoping that the FIA World Council will approve, at their next meeting on March 22, plans to open entries for the 2008 championship on March 24 and then close them again on March 31.

In the letter, sent today to all F1 team principals and manufacturers' representatives, as well as those teams who have expressed an interest in joining the championship, Mosley explained that the motivation behind the move was to allow the FIA to establish the framework of rules for 2008 in consultation with those teams competing in the championship.

Mosley has made it clear that he wants the FIA World Council to approve the early cut-off point on 2008 entries simply because it will allow in-depth talks on rules to begin immediately.

"The reason we are proposing this relatively early closing date is that both the Sporting and Technical regulations may need some limited fine tuning before they are finalised, and we intend to give the teams that are committed to participating at least eighteen months' notice of changes which may affect the design of the cars," wrote Mosley.

"This means that many of the 2008 regulations must be fixed no later than 30 June 2006.

"Once the entries have closed, the participants in the 2008 Championship will be known, enabling the FIA and those teams to use the three months from 31 March to 30 June 2006 for the discussion and agreement of any final adjustments to the regulations.

"Naturally, discussions on the fine tuning of the 2008 regulations will only involve those that intend to participate in the Championship."

Mosley added that the 2008 Sporting Regulations, which have been put together in consultation with those teams already committed to F1 after 2007, are likely to be submitted to the World Motor Sport Council in the week after the Bahrain Grand Prix.

The letter also makes it clear that Mosley wants the manufacturers to remain committed to F1 - but believes they must accept that his cost-cutting drive is aimed at securing their future, not as a way of driving them out.

"The FIA very much hopes that all the teams and manufacturers competing in this year's Championship will also enter for 2008," added Mosley. "Some of the sporting changes proposed for 2008 may be seen as radical, as are some aspects of the Technical Regulations already adopted.

"However, the objective is to reduce costs, improve the spectacle and at the same time, maintain and, where possible, increase current safety levels.

"The FIA believes that at a time of painful restructuring in large sections of the automobile industry, it is only a financially viable Formula One that can hope to retain the major car manufacturers as participants in the medium and long term, not to mention the independent teams. Hence the need to reduce costs.

"The FIA fully understands that one of the objectives of the major car manufacturers is to demonstrate technical excellence, but believes that this can be achieved without excessive expenditure.

"Bearing in mind that much of the engineering effort in the road car sector is aimed at technical excellence at low cost, it is appropriate that the World Championship regulations should attempt to bring this approach into Formula One.

"The credit which a major car company will gain from winning the World Championship will not be any the less if money is no longer being spent on technologies which are largely irrelevant to road cars and often entirely concealed from the public.

"We very much hope that all the current participants will support this approach and submit their entries in due time."

Mosley is believed to be at the Geneva Motorshow today for talks with car manufacturer representatives. It comes amid speculation that the breakaway Grand Prix Manufacturers' Association (GPMA) are on the verge of reaching commercial terms with Bernie Ecclestone to remain committed to F1 – pending discussions on rules.

An FIA spokesman confirmed to autosport.com that a letter had been sent by Mosley to the teams today, but declined to comment on its contents.
 
THE FULL LETTER

To all team principals and manufacturers' representatives
known to have an interest in the 2008 Formula One World Championship

1 March 2006

Gentlemen

On 22 March 2006, the World Motor Sport Council will be invited to approve Formula One Sporting Regulations for 2008. These proposed regulations include a provision that entries for the 2008 Formula One World Championship should open on 24 March 2006 and close on 31 March 2006.

The reason we are proposing this relatively early closing date is that both the Sporting and Technical regulations may need some limited fine tuning before they are finalised, and we intend to give the teams that are committed to participating at least eighteen months' notice of changes which may affect the design of the cars. This means that many of the 2008 regulations must be fixed no later than 30 June 2006. Once the entries have closed, the participants in the 2008 Championship will be known, enabling the FIA and those teams to use the three months from 31 March to 30 June 2006 for the discussion and agreement of any final adjustments to the regulations. Naturally, discussions on the fine tuning of the 2008 regulations will only involve those that intend to participate in the Championship.

The draft 2008 Technical Regulations were, of course, published prior to 31 December 2005 as required by the Concorde Agreement. A preliminary draft of the 2008 Sporting Regulations has already been circulated to the teams which have committed to the 2008 Championship as well as to certain new teams which have indicated that they may wish to enter. We will be happy to provide a copy of this preliminary draft to any other team that requests it, though this may not be exactly identical to the final draft which will be submitted to members of the World Motor Sport Council in the week following the Bahrain Grand Prix with a recommendation that it be accepted. We intend to be able to make a final draft available as soon as it is ready.

The FIA very much hopes that all the teams and manufacturers competing in this year's Championship will also enter for 2008. Some of the sporting changes proposed for 2008 may be seen as radical, as are some aspects of the Technical Regulations already adopted. However, the objective is to reduce costs, improve the spectacle and at the same time, maintain and, where possible, increase current safety levels.

The FIA believes that at a time of painful restructuring in large sections of the automobile industry, it is only a financially viable Formula One that can hope to retain the major car manufacturers as participants in the medium and long term, not to mention the independent teams. Hence the need to reduce costs.

The FIA fully understands that one of the objectives of the major car manufacturers is to demonstrate technical excellence, but believes that this can be achieved without excessive expenditure. Bearing in mind that much of the engineering effort in the road car sector is aimed at technical excellence at low cost, it is appropriate that the World Championship regulations should attempt to bring this approach into Formula One. The credit which a major car company will gain from winning the World Championship will not be any the less if money is no longer being spent on technologies which are largely irrelevant to road cars and often entirely concealed from the public.

We very much hope that all the current participants will support this approach and submit their entries in due time.

Yours sincerely,

Max Mosley
 
Mondini to drive third MF1 in Bahrain

Swiss driver Giorgio Mondini will be the MF1 Racing team's Friday driver at the Bahrain Grand Prix next week.

The team are entitled to use a third car after finishing in ninth place in last year's championship. They have three test drivers, but it will be Mondini who will be in action in the first race of he season.

German Markus Winkelhock will take over Friday testing duties in the next race in Malaysia.
 
Winkelhock, not Mondini to drive in Sakhir

Midland F1 have corrected their earlier statement saying Giorgio Mondini would be driving their third car at the Bahrain Grand Prix.

In their press release following yesterday's test at Silverstone, the team said Mondini would drive in the Sakhir race while teammate Markus Wilkenhock would take over in the following race in Malaysia.

However, speaking to autosport.com, a team spokeswoman said it would in fact be the opposite way, with the German driver in action at Bahrain.

Markus is the son of Manfred, who drove in Formula One from 1980 to 1985.
 
Raikkonen sets blistering Valencia pace

Kimi Raikkonen finished his pre-season testing programme in promising form after posting the fastest time of the winter at the Valencia circuit.

The McLaren's driver lap of 1:09.423 was over half a second faster than the previous best, set by Raikkonen himself earlier this year.

The Finn, at the wheel of the MP4-21, enjoyed a trouble-free day and covered a total of 120 laps, five more than teammate Pedro de la Rosa.

Raikkonen was happy with the week's work, but was still cautious about McLaren's form for Bahrain.

"It has been a good week," Raikkonen told autosport.com. "At least we did not break down and we did some mileage. We did what we could, so we'll see. We still have work to do and I really don't know how well we will do in the race. We will see."

De la Rosa worked with the hybrid car fitted with a V10 engine to complete a fruitful day for his team, who wrapped up their preparations for the Bahrain Grand Prix.

Anthony Davidson was again the busiest man on track for his Honda team, the Briton managing 143 laps in the RA106 on his way to the third fastest time. Davidson will complete the Valencia test tomorrow, when he will shake down the third Honda chassis to be used in Bahrain.

David Coulthard returned to action following his back injury and the Scot enjoyed a trouble-free session, covering 76 laps for his Red Bull team.

Toyota drivers Ralf Schumacher and Jarno Trulli began a two-day test for the Japanese squad, but the German's programme was hindered when he stopped on track with a smoking engine.

Schumacher managed just 59 laps but still outpaced Trulli, sixth quickest.

The second red flag of the day was caused by Williams test driver Alex Wurz, slowest today on the final day of testing for the British squad. The Austrian lost a lot of time while his team fixed a problem with a sensor.

"We lost lots of time when they had to fix but it was good test," he told autosport.com. "But now we are racing. We have done what we could here so, see you in Bahrain."

Today's times:
Code:
[b]Pos	Driver		Team                      	Time		Laps[/b]
1.	Raikkonen	McLaren-Mercedes	(M)	1.09.423	120
2.	de la Rosa	McLaren-Mercedes	(M)	1.09.852	115
3.	Davidson	Honda			(M)	1.10.301	143
4.	Coulthard	Red Bull-Ferrari	(M)	1.11.078	76
5.	R.Schumacher	Toyota			(B)	1.11.129	59
6.	Trulli		Toyota			(B)	1.12.159	80
7.	Wurz		Williams-Cosworth	(B)	1.12.257	70

All Timing Unofficial
 
Rain hinders Ferrari at Mugello

Poor weather thwarted Ferrari's testing programme at the Mugello circuit again, with the conditions making it impossible to carry out any significant work.

Rain and snow during the night had left the track in poor condition.

Michael Schumacher managed just 17 laps while teammate Felipe Massa covered 32, both men at the wheel of the 248 F1.

Schumacher was the quickest of the two with a best time of 1:23.564, nearly four seconds faster than Massa's 1:27.314.

The team will continue working at Mugello tomorrow, with Schumacher on track.
 
Back
Top Bottom