rpstewart said:McLaren + Vodaphone - yup it'll be red and silver a-la DTM, bit of a no brainer really. Orange test cars, it's almost traditional when McLaren have a major sponsorship change that they go for Orange. Thinking about it though other than traditional McLaren orange I can only think of the team having 3 1/2 different liveries - Yardley, Marlboro and West, the half being Keke's one off Marboro Lights MP4/2C. It does bring on a major problem as far as I'm concerned though, I have an almost complete collection of 1/18 scale model McLarens from 1988 onwards, this means I'll likely end up with 4 2007 cars
rpstewart said:Shorter season - go for it. 20 plus races is OK for IRL or the like where all you have to do is keep the car in one piece but when you're developing and racing a dynamic design the guys in the team don't get a chance to rest. Agree with the sentiment on 2 races in Germany and 2 in Italy, there's no need. I actually quite like Imola but it has to be Monza for an Italian GP, Imola would be fine as a once in a while venue for a Euro GP, along with the Nurburgring, Jerez, Paul Ricard etc
RBR2: it's a very sexy looking thing, says Coulthard
Red Bull Racing's Ferrari-powered RB2 turned a wheel for the first time today, when it completed day one of a two-day test at Silverstone.
Driven by David Coulthard, the new car completed a limited number of laps of the 5.141km track, as the team carried out a series of system checks on its new package ahead of its official launch in March 2006.
Although today's test was not the first for the Ferrari V8 engine, which has already completed a number of circuit kilometres, it was first for the Red Bull Racing / Ferrari combination.
David said, "Testing the new car today was momentous, as it represents something completely new for the team. The engine was delivered from Italy, but then everything has been built around it, and this was the moment when all the newly created parts came together. The lines of the new car look as though they've been inspired by the Formula Unas, it's a very sexy looking thing!
"In terms of driving experience, the car performed as expected on track and I'm looking forward to putting it through its paces tomorrow and throughout next year to see what it can do. As soon as you drive a new car you have a new toy to play with, so the old one quickly becomes very uninteresting!
"Testing a new car can be frustrating at times, as you're finding out if the new designs are able to withstand intense vibrations and heat. However, when everything works well, it's incredibly rewarding so it will be good to get back in the car tomorrow. It must be a very proud moment for everyone in the team, as they've each played a part in creating something new here."
David will be at the wheel again tomorrow (Friday) for the second day of the test. The Red Bull Racing and Ferrari technicians worked closely together throughout the day, demonstrating the positive relationship that has developed between the two marques over the last few months.
Technical details of the car are due to be released at the car's official launch on 9 March 2006 in Bahrain.
Williams undecided on eleventh F1 team
Williams have revealed that its not just the Midland team that is standing in the way of an eleventh team, Super Aguri, entering F1 next season, as they too haven't said yes.
In order for the Super Aguri team to make its debut in 2006, the team needs all ten of its rivals to agree to its entrance. But while some teams have said no - Midland is believed to be one of those - others have still to decide.
A spokesman for Williams told Reuters that the Grove team's decision is pending as they are first waiting for more details about the new team's viability.
However, the spokesman added that the team has "not said no" he added.
"We have just asked for more information that they are viable, have funding and are not going to appear and disappear."
Michelin maintain FIA fume - 16 December 2005
A day after vowing to quit the sport at the end of 2006, Michelin has again aimed fire at F1's governing body, FIA.
In a parting shot, the French marque's boss - Edouard Michelin - vaguely suggested that recent rule changes, like the re-introduction of tyre changing at pitstops, is designed to help Bridgestone back to form.
He also told Italy's La Gazzetta dello Sport newspaper: 'The FIA's position changes depending on situations, and reflects a ... lack of transparency regarding the reasons for some choices.'
Bridgestone shod Michael Schumacher, however, denied that a return to the 2004 tyre rule will necessarily wave a magic wand over Ferrari's dire recent pace.
The German said at Jerez on Thursday that the red team's lack of pace had 'nothing to do' with the now axed one-tyre-per-race ruling.
He admitted: 'Up to a certain level (the 2006 rule) can help, but it cannot make us world champions.'
One of Japanese supplier Bridgestone's new teams - Williams - might also benefit from the rule change, but lead driver Mark Webber stopped short of welcoming Michelin's exit.
In fact, he bluntly told Autosport: 'It will be [edit]poo[/edit] without tyre competition - but it happens.
'They have been driven to pull out and it is very sad.'
F1 Buyout Hurdles Delay Resolving the Future of the Sport
Formula one's road to peace is being held up by its new owner, McLaren principal Ron Dennis revealed this week.
He said the carmakers' disgruntled 'breakaway' group is having trouble dealing with 86 per cent shareholder CVC Capital Partners, because the buyout deal is yet to get EU approval.
''At the moment (it) does not own formula one,'' the Briton told Reuters.
Dennis suggested that there is also an 'issue' with Lehman -- a third bank that is yet to agree to sell the final 14 per cent of the formula one business.
It is still expected that, legally, Lehman could challenge CVC's right to buy the sport before any of the three banks were offered the shares.
Such a scenario could scupper the whole CVC deal.
Dennis, the Woking based team principal, added that until the issues are resolved, CVC is 'not in a position to sit and talk to us.'
Renault reacts to Michelin's quit decision
Following Wednesday's announcement by Michelin that it is to withdraw from F1 at the end of 2006, World Champions Renault have issued the following statement:
"We learn of Michelin's departure with regret, but we respect their decision.
Our technical collaboration in Formula 1 dates back to 1977, and culminated with double championship victory in 2005.
But we enter the new season as world champions, and we are determined to do justice to that status."
Indeed, what of the 2006 season? Does Michelin's planned departure at year's end leave the Renault F1 Team with performance worries for the coming year?
"Not at all," explains Bob Bell. "We go into 2006 as world champions, and we are determined to defend those titles. I have no doubt that Michelin intend to do exactly the same.
"We have already seen enhanced collaboration between the Michelin teams this winter, and a rapid rate of tyre development. We are confident this will continue until the final round of 2006."
-Mic- said:Poor Flibster.
Posting all taht and no one cares to reply.
rpstewart said:I would have done earlier had I not been at lunch....
Colin's quotes are as relevant today as they were when they were made. I think it's quite safe to say that the sport would be nothing like it is today without his influence.
rpstewart said:Where does the DFV fit into this? Would Ford have commissioned it for anyone other than Lotus?
rpstewart said:Last I heard they've put it, or at least major parts of it, back into production to support the Thoroughbred GP series.
kicks66 said:am i right in saying that even though they are going to use v8s they still be pretty mcuh the same speed as before?
Richards gives Villeneuve a verbal kicking
Former BAR boss David Richards has launched an outspoken attack against Jacques Villeneuve, dismissing the French/Canadian as "past his sell-by date" and suggesting that he may be a disruptive influence at BMW.
There's no love lost between the pair after their turbulent relationship at BAR culminated in Richards deciding not to offer JV a new deal. Or at least a contract offering a salary in excess of £1.
Villeneuve has not been shy about voicing his contempt for Richards, admitting that he was happy to see him ousted as BAR’s Team Principal.
Although JV accused Richards of orchestrating a whispering campaign against him in the paddock, Richards has remained, in public at least, silent on his former driver. Until now.
"Bluntly, he's past his sell-by, and has been for some time," he told F1-Racing magazine.
"I know that Mario [Theissen, BMW-Sauber's new boss] is retaining Jacques' services, but if I'd been him I wouldn't have even entertained the idea. In a difficult year - and 2006 will definitely be difficult for BMW - the last thing they need is someone like Jacques."
What's more, Richards was insistent that it was a mistake for Sauber to bring back JV into F1 last season.
"I was surprised to see that Peter employed Jacques. It was an odd decision, and it certainly didn’t seem to work out. I sensed there were periods in the middle of the season, and even early on, when Peter's famously calm Swiss exterior showed the extent of his frustration with the Jacques situation."
Damning words; but then again, it should be remembered that Richards is the team boss who gave Crashaholic Takuma Sato a full-time seat in F1 and then offered to give his errant driver a driving lesson based on his golf swing.
IRL IndyCar - Toyota make withdrawal official
In a move that has been universally expected for several months Toyota has officially announced that 2005 was their final season in the IndyCar Series.
Toyota was originally scheduled to leave after the 2006 season, but the manufacturer stated, “…that decision was expedited one year to allow the IRL to move to a common engine for the upcoming season.”
Curiously, the IndyCar move to a common engine was mostly predicated by Chevrolet's planned withdrawal after 2005 and the rapid departure of the Penske and Ganassi Racing teams from the Toyota camp.
That left Toyota without a front-line team using their already horsepower disadvantaged engines. The proverbial writing was on the wall showing the effort necessary to win races in 2006 would not be worth Toyota continuing to invest in their IndyCar Series program.
“We appreciate the time we've spent in the IndyCar Series,” said Jim Aust, Toyota vice president of motorsports. “In winning the 2003 Indianapolis 500, Toyota earned its greatest motorsports accomplishment and we'll forever cherish that victory. Our gratitude goes out to Tony George and the Indy Racing League for providing us the opportunity to compete in, and win, the greatest spectacle in racing.”
Toyota entered the IndyCar Series in 2003 after building up a successful program in the rival CART series. The manufacturer won the IndyCar Series championship in 2003 with Scott Dixon of Ganassi Racing, and also won the Indianapolis 500 with Gil de Ferran and Penske Racing.
Their fortunes would take a dramatic turn for the worse in 2004 when Honda Racing decided to vigorously fight back with an expensive manufacturer battle. Honda's on track dominance eventually drove both Toyota and Chevrolet from IndyCar racing as the cost of winning began to greatly exceed the value of competing in the sport.
Toyota would still win races on some handling tracks where raw power was not as important, but the loss of engineering powerhouses like Penske and Ganassi meant repeating such successes in 2006 would not be possible.
Scott Dixon scored Toyota's final IndyCar Series victory on the historic road course in Watkins Glen, New York late in the 2005 season.
“We truly appreciate Toyota's participation and service in the IndyCar Series,” said Brian Barnhart, president and chief operating officer for the Indy Racing Leagues. “They have been great partners to the series both on and off the race track.”
Renault R26 on schedule
Bob Bell, Renault's Technical Director, discussed testing progress in recent weeks, and gave an update on the new R26 ahead of Christmas.
Q: The team has completed three weeks of winter testing before Christmas. What have you learned?
Bob Bell: Our testing programme has gone very well. The drivers have noticed that we need quite a different set-up on the car, so we have worked hard to understand what is required, and give ourselves a solid baseline for our work with the new car in January.
Equally, we have done a lot of tyre development to begin adapting to the new regulations in this area, and we have reaped the benefits of a reliable package to conduct a lot of running and make good progress.
Q: Will Michelin's announcement last Wednesday, concerning their withdrawal from Formula 1 beyond 2006, have an impact on our work for next season?
BB: Not at all. We go into 2006 as world champions, and we are determined to defend those titles. I have no doubt that Michelin intend to do exactly the same. We have already seen enhanced collaboration between the Michelin teams this winter, and a rapid rate of tyre development. We are confident this will continue until the final round of 2006.
Q: You have announced that the R26 will run for the first time on January 10 at Jerez. Is everything on track?
BB: We are on schedule with the project. As always, the programme for producing the new car is very tight because we look to maximise our design time before production begins, and then running time once it is complete.
Indeed, for 2006 we have brought forward our first runs with the new car: this allows us to anticipate any issues that may arise when we run the V8 for the first time on track, and ensure we have a fully reliable package for the opening race in Bahrain.
F1's Concorde Agreement made public
A copy of the highly confidential Concorde Agreement has been made public.
US news agency 'RaceFax Online' is offering F1's 100-page commercial agreement - albeit the expired 1997 version - to paid subscribers at racefax.com.
The agency said 'recent events' - no doubt the rancid political environment surrounding the renewal of a 2008-2012 Concorde - had inspired the decision to make the document public.
'We have been in possession of the Concorde for many years,' said the agency.