Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 38,367
First things first this is for peak performance - not peak overclock.
For example I've just started overclocking my 2070 super. RAM only at the moment and my results are as per below. Once i get peak RAM performance I will then do the core.
Stock - Graphics Score 10,385
+100 - Graphics Score 10,377
+200 - Graphics Score 10,286
+300 - Graphics Score 10,440
+400 - Graphics Score 10,485
+500 - Graphics Score 10,465
+600 - Graphics Score 10,473
+700 - Graphics Score 10,525
+800 - Graphics Score 10,536
+900 - Graphics Score 10,565
+1000 - Graphics Score 10,568
+1050 - Graphics Score 10,608
+1100 - Graphics Score 10,576
I'm about to try +300 mhz on the memory now. If it's less than 10286 then should I even bother trying higher speeds or leave it on stock? I might try up to 500 for a laugh.
Then I will move onto core overclocking and test the same. However with only +25 increases.
I'm not entirely convinced +1000 is stable going to test +1100 and see what happens. Otherwise I'm going back down to +900
+900 - seems like a nice one to go with. Albeit +1050 seems better I'd rather just be safe than sorry.
For example I've just started overclocking my 2070 super. RAM only at the moment and my results are as per below. Once i get peak RAM performance I will then do the core.
Stock - Graphics Score 10,385
+100 - Graphics Score 10,377
+200 - Graphics Score 10,286
+300 - Graphics Score 10,440
+400 - Graphics Score 10,485
+500 - Graphics Score 10,465
+600 - Graphics Score 10,473
+700 - Graphics Score 10,525
+800 - Graphics Score 10,536
+900 - Graphics Score 10,565
+1000 - Graphics Score 10,568
+1050 - Graphics Score 10,608
+1100 - Graphics Score 10,576
I'm about to try +300 mhz on the memory now. If it's less than 10286 then should I even bother trying higher speeds or leave it on stock? I might try up to 500 for a laugh.
Then I will move onto core overclocking and test the same. However with only +25 increases.
I'm not entirely convinced +1000 is stable going to test +1100 and see what happens. Otherwise I'm going back down to +900
+900 - seems like a nice one to go with. Albeit +1050 seems better I'd rather just be safe than sorry.
Last edited: