But if you are fast enough or what ever, should it really matter?
I watched Bigger, Stronger, Faster the other night. Good watch and I recommend it to anyone interested in the whole steroid debate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigger,_Stronger,_Faster*
Just saw that on your recommendation. Very good watch.
It highlights the fact that most people (including me) know next to nothing about actual steroid use but base their opinions erroneously on what they see in the media.
People on the internet probably told him it would be fine so he carried on.
Personally i would never use steroids. Whether people want to admit or not, there are nasty physical side effects. Much of the damage steroid abuse can cause is irreversible too, its well documented.
This made me smile. Sad truth is, you're probably right. Steroid users are like any drug abuser, they need be around each other for reasurance that what they are doing is normal and fine, whether on forums or in real life.
As far as i know, gynecomastia and hair loss are not reversible.Actually they haven't and the majority of "damage" is reversible. Do your research before you make such sweeping statements
Of course steroids have medical uses but when people take them purely for building muscle, using up to 100 times normal therapeutic doses, thats abuse.Not to sound patronising but there is a difference between steroid use and steroid abuse. Steroid users are not like any drug abusers. Alcohol abuse for example is a lot more dangerous than steroid abuse. 99% of over the counter drugs if abused will effect far worse damage than steroids.
Remember steroids are just synthesised hormones (i.e u have a fair amount of steroids already in you) and have been used as approved drugs for ages
Finally nothing is well documented as there has NEVER been a study into the long term effects of steroid use.
Sadly not. You will not be considered for international lightweight rowing if you are under 6'2", or for international rowing if you are 6'4".surely your ability is what matters here, not just height?
Actually they haven't and the majority of "damage" is reversible. Do your research before you make such sweeping statements.
Finally nothing is well documented as there has NEVER been a study into the long term effects of steroid use.
See this is the problem, people spouting rubbish about steroids when they actually know very little themselves.
Frazzles, your cataracts may have been caused by steroids. BUT they would be corticosteroids, NOT anabolic steroids. Two very different things. So maybe you should learn some facts before posting tripe.
Jeffstar, you sound like the media. Using extreme examples to scaremonger and argue your case. Gynecomastia is really not that common. But if you happen to be on a cycle and start to notice the onset of gyno then nolva can be taken to deal with that. Some teenage boys develop gynecomastia during puberty and surgery can be used to fix it. The same option is available to bodybuilders on AAS who may suffer badly with it.
Hair loss can be sped up if your already predisposed to suffer male pattern baldness. But not everyone who uses AAS loses their hair.
You also seem unable to grasp that their are users and abusers. Many people use AAS in a responsible way, making sure they do a proper post cycle therapy (PCT). Also having their bloodwork done to monitor their health.
But then like many drugs, legal and illegal, you have your abusers. Who instead of using these powerful hormones responsibly, decide to completely disregard their health and safety. They take massive amounts, never run a PCT and ignore side effects until you end up with someone like the guy from the OP. You keep going on about all these well documented study's, can you post them up?
Then the old roid rage rubbish. If someone gets angry and their on AAS it's roid rage, if their not on AAS it's just normal everyday anger. Yes you do get ****'s who happen to take steroids, but from my experience they were ****'s before.
You want to see rage just find some idiots who have had too much to drink. Alcohol rage is a much bigger problem wouldn't you agree? Or is that ok with you because alcohol is accepted in society?
Regarding the psychiatric effects again it all comes down use and abuse. Some of the negative psychiatric effects occur when a proper pct is not run. The body has stopped producing it's own testosterone, and low test can cause a number psychological problems even in people who have never touched AAS.
Other psychiatric effects are based on the users own insecurity's. For example they may fear losing their gains and "don't want to become small again" to quote what someone once said to me. So they simply stay on AAS all year round, this again falls into the category of an abuser.
The biggest psychiatric effect is the society we live in today. Theirs so much pressure for young men to look a certain way. A young lad wanting to take AAS is similar to those 15-16 year old girls who want boob and nose jobs etc.
Then you just have some already crazy mofo who decides to take AAS.
I'm thinking more and more that athletics needs to simply come up with a level for testosterone in the system thats acceptable, because everyone has different levels and someone with abnormally high, but natural levels has an advantage over those with abnormally low levels, to even it out the low guy(gal maybe) should be able to take something, but only at a relatively normal level.
Some athletes are going to be naturally stronger or faster than others, should we start giving their rivals a helping hand to even the field out?
Levels of testosterone in a persons blood stream should be considered to be no different to any other genetic trait IMO
Well at the moment there is nothing, I mean 100% nothing they can do to stop people taking mega doses of steroids for years, bulking up, leaning up, doing whatever they want then going off them for 6 months to a year before entering for competitions. SO you can 100% have all the ill gotten gains from testosterone and get to a level you couldn't naturally get to, then simply maintain it right into competition.
Our 400 or 800m(forget which, think 800, that "thick" black british women) is the same, she "missed" 3 tests, on purpose, she clearly knew she would be found guilty, got banned for a year, managed to get back but is probably running at a level she couldn't get without help. SO she's cheating and everyones happy with it.