Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 2,775
16:9 vs 21:9 wars.
vs 32:9 5120x144016:9 vs 21:9 wars.
Which in turn hogs nearly 10cm more desk space than 32" 16:9 for actually smaller image area because of 6 cm lower image height.
Don’t go 4K, the GPU power required makes it very expensive. Go 34” 3440x1440p ultrawide.
Curved is actually Ok if you’re not doing a lot of things with straight lines like CAD. I don’t notice the curve on mine at all now.Yeah they are fantastic monitors really glad I changed from 32" 16:9 - my main reason though was going from 75mhz to 144mhz and I couldnt find a cheap decent 32" IPS 144mhz monitor - that wasnt curved.
Now dont get me started about curved monitors
Flat v Curved
Curved is actually Ok if you’re not doing a lot of things with straight lines like CAD. I don’t notice the curve on mine at all now.
Dont play fps on 32 inch it slows down you reaction times to much maximun 27
now flight sims it would look awsome or elite
Love my 35" Asus PG35VQ (3440 x 1440)So to play do you recommend a 2k better than a 4k? (I see a fullhd very obsolete already) Anyone in particular?
Thank you
it's hardly hogging space when its a WIDER aspect.Which in turn hogs nearly 10cm more desk space than 32" 16:9 for actually smaller image area because of 6 cm lower image height.
Also love my Alienware AW3418DW. it's great!Love my 35" Asus PG35VQ (3440 x 1440)
There a little pricey but worth it
HDR in some games looks really great i really would not want to own a non HDR monitor these daysAnd second, 2k + HDR is better than 4k