dmpoole said:5 threads - yes it is unvelievable for such a crap overrated film.
You could have just said that in your first post without baiting someone in with your 'unbelievable' nonsense
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c52ff/c52ff17eea75f5fa374792d68c3cb4c06c406d96" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
dmpoole said:5 threads - yes it is unvelievable for such a crap overrated film.
Scam said:You could have just said that in your first post without baiting someone in with your 'unbelievable' nonsense![]()
three of which are old/redundant, as i already pointed out above. in fact there are only two current threads, and for a big release this is perfectly understandable. seems to me you're making a mountain out of a molehill. i mean what difference does it make to you anyway? if you think it's wrong then report it, and let the mods decide. simple.dmpoole said:No - the unbelievable is that someone couldn't be arsed to search for the other 4 threads on 300.
seek said:if you think it's wrong then report it, and let the mods decide. simple.