• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

3D Mark announces Steel Nomad benchmark, replaces Timespy

Soldato
Joined
6 Feb 2019
Posts
18,733
After several years, 3D Mark says Timespy's reign at the top is coming to a close

It will be replaced with a new benchmark called Steel Nomad, but it is not yet available for download





 
Last edited:
It will probably be a mixed benchmark, stressing multiple parts of the system just like Timespy also worked as a CPU and memory test, would not be surprised if it has some Ray tracing but I don't expect it to be fully Ray traced like port Royal.

Timespy was meant as an overall benchmark to see how well your PC as a whole could handle new and future games and this will probably do the same
 
Last edited:

3DMark Steel Nomad will be free. Nice!



Wonder if there will be an xtreme version for paid users like timespy and firestrike
 
Last edited:
There is an update in the steam group. Looks to be a slight delay but maybe April.


They can take their time to tweak it I don't mind. As they correctly point out it's not a good look to launch a benchmark that requires updates because the scores are not accurate across different hardware configurations as such updates would invalidate past results and require resets of the ladders; for this type of benchmark it needs to be accurate and work on day one, so they can take their time no rush
 

Seems like it favours nvidia a good bit

True performance of the 4090, unrestrained

Also, would suggest looking at the default benchmark performance; that website has done the default and the light mode test, the light mode numbers look a bit weird probably due to cpu bottlenecks or some other issue but the default mode numbers look as you'd expect with the 4090 in the lead, followed by the 7900xtx, followed by the 4080 super

For example, the scores on the default test:

4090: 11287
7900xtx: 7307
4080 super: 7243
 
Last edited:
You guys may want to make a new thread to store the scores; I don't have the time or will to create a leaderboard for this thread
 
My best score

This is with +1000mhz on the memory and +150mhz on the core. Adding a further 50mhz on the core and 500mhz memory did nothing, I believe the GPU is power limited.

Unlike Timespy, this benchmark never crashes for me even if I set crazy clocks, they just don't do anything, the clocks stop going up because its power limited

 
Last edited:
p4pb26682945.jpg



If you can't validate your score save it and try again later. It won't validate unless systeminfo has worked correctly.



only validated scores

  1. momo56, 4090, core 3135, Mem 1563, Score 10963, link
  2. RSR, 4090, core 3090, Mem 1544, Score 10508, link
  3. nlel1975, 7900 XTX, Core 2320, Mem 2500, Score 6485, Link
  4. Ross Thomson, 7900 GRE, Core 2535, Mem 2616, score 5343, link
  5. Clarence Boddicker, 7800 XT, core 2734, Mem 2624, Score 4532, link
  6. Humbug, 7800 XT, core 2747, Mem 2538, Score 4472, Link

None of the runs I did worked, everytime I click on compare online I get error code "2"
 
I wouldn't go that far :p But yes it's a bit limited!

Most GPU benchmarks don't look particularly great; I suppose its because your benchmark doesn't need to look good to be demanding and being demanding for modern hardware is the goal of the benchmark.

The last time I was impressed by the visuals of a benchmark was when Heaven was released in 2009
 
Back
Top Bottom