• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

3DMark DirectX Raytracing Feature Test & Port Royal Bench Thread.

Same, image quality with DLSS on was a vast improvement even at 4K. 62fps at 4K with 2x 2080 Ti's vs 34fps with DLSS off :eek:

http://www.3dmark.com/nd/30058

I think what some people are seeing as image improvement is in part down to the higher fps with DLSS.

This is something I notice with the ordinary Port Royal without using DLSS when comparing a single card to SLI.

Having said that when using SLI it is hard to tell when DLSS is off or on when looking at image quality as the fps are quite good (85fps v 120fps).
 
The test does not even start, just tried it with no OC applied still does not start.

It took 2 or 3 minutes for it to start on my PC after it had finished loading.

It seems to load a bit quicker after it has been run for the first time.

There is also a separate bench for DLSS off and on which can be found down the bottom of all the other benches like Firestrike and Timespy etc, try running that to see if it launches.
 
Hey @Kaapstad

For laughs I ran Port Royal at 4k with max settings

CgDOpLk.jpg

and got a score of 0 (2059 graphics settings)

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/35108887?

I was interested to note that my CPU basically idled and my VRAM usage was 9 GB. I did manage to get double-figure FPS from time to time

i7-8700 stock
Gigabyte RTX 2080 Ti (stuck) on quiet mode in a x8 slot
Driver: 419.35

UKX9Lhi.jpg



Using the same settings as you.
2 RTX Titans overclocked.

29bturl.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom