4 Gig memory. Vista doesn't think so

If you are running 32bit Vista it is normal, to utilise the full amount you will need 64bit Vista.
 
Last edited:
In my experience, the most RAM I've ever seen integrated graphics consume is 64/128mb.
 
no it's 4GB, but it's 4GB for Video and System Memory Combined.

Not only for those, also for the pci, pcie busses etc...

I had 3.2 ghz too in xp when I tryed 4gb.
On the other hand, that was shown in post screen already so I don't know, didn't try 4gb yet on my p5b deluxe as my slower RAM wouldn't be able to keep up with my OC.
 
Not only for those, also for the pci, pcie busses etc...

I had 3.2 ghz too in xp when I tryed 4gb.
On the other hand, that was shown in post screen already so I don't know, didn't try 4gb yet on my p5b deluxe as my slower RAM wouldn't be able to keep up with my OC.

3.2ghz ram isnt what I'd call slow :p
 
In my experience, the most RAM I've ever seen integrated graphics consume is 64/128mb.

That has nothing to do with it though. Basically there are a lot of devices in the average PC nowadays that will need to map their onboard memory into the virtual memory address space. Graphics cards are just one of these. Even network cards and SATA controllers do it.

That's why on 32-bit operating systems there is usually a large chunk of "missing" main memory. It's because that memory can't be mapped to any location on a virtual memory address space.
 
That has nothing to do with it though. Basically there are a lot of devices in the average PC nowadays that will need to map their onboard memory into the virtual memory address space. Graphics cards are just one of these. Even network cards and SATA controllers do it.

That's why on 32-bit operating systems there is usually a large chunk of "missing" main memory. It's because that memory can't be mapped to any location on a virtual memory address space.
So you're saying you can't use the unmapped memory, unless you using a 64-bit CPU and OS?
 
if you have a 64-bit OS then you still can't use "unmapped memory" however, the system can map a LOT more RAM (16exabytes or something similarly insane)


Is it no coincidence that it's RAM that doesn't get address space when you have too much? It never happens to be some other component that just won't work?
 
Back
Top Bottom