• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

£470 to spend..

8800gtx wont get to ultra speeds without pencil mods and bios flashes, all of which void warranty. and ultra is a better core.

id get a evga ultra superclocked ;)
 
eracer2006 said:
8800gtx wont get to ultra speeds without pencil mods and bios flashes, all of which void warranty. and ultra is a better core.

id get a evga ultra superclocked ;)
Click to expand...

Are you sure? Standard ultra has only 612/1500/2160 clocks. I've seen gtx's get that easily (there are a quite a few in the 3dmark06 toplist in this forum).

But i would agree that an ultra would overclock far beyond a gtx.
 
470 pounds,

i had 540 pounds to spend on "graphics" befor i got my HD 2900 XT.

I was getting a ultra a few weeks befor the 2900, and i thaught, is it really worth 528 pounds for a overclocked ugly looking GTX?

anyway.. i waited a week or so, and got a 2900XT and i dont regret one bit of it, cheap cheerfull and its somthing new and a nice change from the boring nvidia drivers etc :)

but if you want a monster beast supercharged nitro l33t thing, then wait for the G92 which is 1teraflop so they say, (3x faster than the g80)

:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom