• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

4870 on way back...

i 100% agree with the thread creator. I'm finding it hard to justify upgrades at the moment till we get some new games ( like crysis ) which really push hardware. i can play all the games i play ( bar crysis) at max quality with 2 or 4X aa at 19x12. I also enable V sync as i see no point with 100+ FPS
 
What were you honestly expecting when you cap at 60fps and the gtx would already manage most games bar crysis at 60 at 1680...I really would like to know.


That's what I don't quite understand either. It's like tightening up the throttle cable for 60% max throttle and then changing from a 300HP car to a 500HP car, then saying you are disappointed with the acceleration of the new car.
 
To be honest I think a lot of people just WANT to upgrade but if you really look at the performance gains you can ask yourself, is it really worth it? At this point I can run all games on my rig perfectly... I guess with some newer games and at high resolutions it might really be worth it...

yes like a lot of the people here i just upgrade becuase i find it fun searchign for new parts etc etc and enjoy overclocking, its what i enjoy doing. But i find it just gives me a better eexcuse having new games to play with that extra power.
 
That's what I don't quite understand either. It's like tightening up the throttle cable for 60% max throttle and then changing from a 300HP car to a 500HP car, then saying you are disappointed with the acceleration of the new car.

And the car analogies begin! :D But yes thats my exact point I just don't understand the reasoning :confused:.
 
I always find it funny when i hear people on about seeing, or hoping to see, a *big* boost when they are on about 15-20%. I went from a GF2 pro to a 9700pro to a 4850, now they are big boosts! :D
 
This really has caused quite a stir!

Okay, maybe disappointed was a little strong, but after reading all the reviews and hearing everyone rave about it, I thought it would be something else.

Which, to be fair, it wasn't really. But like I said before, it wasn't really in MY situation.

Also, as I said before too, everything I run bar Crysis ran pretty nicely with the GTX, so I had no real reason to benchmark it, until getting the 4870. Only then did I realise that the GTX is capable of running almost all of my games with 4x AA at the FPS cap of 60.

Had I realised that before I ordered the 4870, I don't think I would have bothered. But there you go. I guess I kind of set myself up to be disappointed if i'm honest.

And someone hit the nail on the head a moment ago - sometimes I just WANT to upgrade, whether I need it or not is another thing. But for a change, rather than keep something I don't need, i'm sending it back and saving the money.

If my experience helps anyone else, great. If not, then i'm not bothered, but I thought it would be good to share it anyway.
 
This really has caused quite a stir!

Okay, maybe disappointed was a little strong, but after reading all the reviews and hearing everyone rave about it, I thought it would be something else.

Which, to be fair, it wasn't really. But like I said before, it wasn't really in MY situation.

Also, as I said before too, everything I run bar Crysis ran pretty nicely with the GTX, so I had no real reason to benchmark it, until getting the 4870. Only then did I realise that the GTX is capable of running almost all of my games with 4x AA at the FPS cap of 60.

Had I realised that before I ordered the 4870, I don't think I would have bothered. But there you go. I guess I kind of set myself up to be disappointed if i'm honest.

And someone hit the nail on the head a moment ago - sometimes I just WANT to upgrade, whether I need it or not is another thing. But for a change, rather than keep something I don't need, i'm sending it back and saving the money.

If my experience helps anyone else, great. If not, then i'm not bothered, but I thought it would be good to share it anyway.

And kudos for your effort though it is a bit misleading, as the majority of people play with vsync off the 4870 would be able to stretch it's legs and show you what it's truly capable of. You were right, in the sense you set yourself up for disappointment as your gtx is coping well at that res and aa anyway in maintaining 60fps. For those who do use vsync and have an 8800gtx will probably find this helpful so it is probably not all in vain.
 
If you game with vysnc off then pointless upgrading from anything in the past year but if you game with it on as the screen tearing bugs you then a 4850 or 4870 is a good upgrade as it allows higher FPS + max AF + AA in most current games.
 
If you game with vysnc off then pointless upgrading from anything in the past year but if you game with it on as the screen tearing bugs you then a 4850 or 4870 is a good upgrade as it allows higher FPS + max AF + AA in most current games.

That's the opposite of what other's are saying:p

Others have said:
Vsync off = buy 4870
Vsync on = don't buy 4870

I don't know much about Vsync but from the little i've read it limits the fps to about 60 so therefore you will only see the benefit of the 4870 if you game with Vsync off. Does that sound about right?
 
Last edited:
That's the opposite of what other's are saying:p

Others have said:
Vsync off = buy 4870
Vsync on = don't buy 4870

I don't know much about Vsync but from the little i've read it limits the fps to about 60 so therefore you will only see the benefit of the 4870 if you game with Vsync off. Does that sound about right?

Really this is relating to 1680 and lower but in short yes.
 
As title, picked up a 4870 from an e-tailer.

Received it yesterday, and was really looking forward to a nice performance boost.

To be perfectly honest, I was really disappointed. In fact, so much so that I have returned the card already and am sticking with my trusty GTX. :(

Before making the decision to return it, I made sure that the old drivers were properly cleaned by running the standard removal, then Driver Sweeper in Safe Mode.

I also tried the Hotfix drivers, which are supposed to be the best available for the 4870 right now, but I just didn't see the gains I expected.

I ran Crysis, COD 4, Stalker and GRID and didn't really see gains that were worth the outlay (would work out around £70 to upgrade when my GTX is sold).

To be perfectly honest though, it's likely my own fault as I like to have vsync enabled, thus limiting the FPS to 60, which is more than enough for any game.

What I didn't really notice before is that almost all of the games I currently play sync perfectly at 60FPS with 4x AA and full AF enabled at my default 1680 x 1050 resolution (except Crysis of course), so the 4870 didn't really have a chance to stretch it's muscles I guess.

I did notice on the Crysis bench that at my default resolution and all settings at high, the 4870 wasn't all that...

GTX scored as follows with no AA.... Min FPS: 20.88, Max FPS: 41.41, Overall Average FPS: 35.315

4870 scored as follows with no AA.... Min FPS: 20.91, Max FPS: 53.25, Overall Average FPS: 44.485

GTX scored as follows with 4x AA.... Min FPS: 17.74, Max FPS: 33.76, Overall Average FPS: 28.29

4870 scored as follows with 4x AA.... Min FPS: 18.22, Max FPS: 40.75, Overall Average FPS: 30.585


Now, 3dMark 06 at 1680 x 1050....

GTX - 12,869, 4870 - 13,760

Now i'm no expert, but those gains are a little disappointing. Look at the minimum FPS on both cards, there is almost no difference at all. :confused:

What I also noticed is that the 4870 is shockingly loud on startup, both at the bios screen and once in Windows. Now whilst idle it is no louder than the GTX, and when stressed pretty much the same too. In fact it might even be a little quieter than the GTX, but the pitch is a little more annoying.

So, the card is going back tomorrow. Some of you may think i've gone mad, but this has been my experience, YMMV.

Hope this helps some of you considering changing from a superclocked GTX. IMHO it's not worth it, or at least at 1680 x 1050 it's not.

I went fro a 8800gts 640Mb to a Sapphire HD4870 and my 3dmark06 went from 14997 to 16925, i cirtanly notice the difference in crysis , cod4 and assasins creed and wont be sending the card back:p

i too have a q6600 , 4gbOCZ ddr2 on an Asus Rampage Formula, i agree on your motherboard it dont seem much of an improvement :mad:
 
That's the opposite of what other's are saying:p

Others have said:
Vsync off = buy 4870
Vsync on = don't buy 4870

I don't know much about Vsync but from the little i've read it limits the fps to about 60 so therefore you will only see the benefit of the 4870 if you game with Vsync off. Does that sound about right?

It all comes down to what OP was saying about the 'minimum' frame rate being really no better, whether that is down to the card or the rest of his system is another question.

...but what's the point in buying a 4870 to play games with V-sync off when all it's doing is rendering a bunch of extra frames that you won't see anyway? it's the minimum frame-rate that is important regardless of whether you have v-sync on or off.
 
Last edited:
That's the opposite of what other's are saying:p

Others have said:
Vsync off = buy 4870
Vsync on = don't buy 4870

I don't know much about Vsync but from the little i've read it limits the fps to about 60 so therefore you will only see the benefit of the 4870 if you game with Vsync off. Does that sound about right?

You only need to upgrade atm with Vsync on when you cant hold a steady Vsync 60 in your games any more due to new game or new higher res monitor.
 
Problem is the lowest minimum is taken with fraps, which obviously could be a loading texture slowdown for half a second. Should really compare median minimums for a fairer outlook.
 
That's the opposite of what other's are saying:p

Others have said:
Vsync off = buy 4870
Vsync on = don't buy 4870

I don't know much about Vsync but from the little i've read it limits the fps to about 60 so therefore you will only see the benefit of the 4870 if you game with Vsync off. Does that sound about right?
Vsync locks the FPS to whatever refresh rate your monitor is capable of so for most TFTs that would be either 60/75FPS. For HDTVs that is usually 60FPS. Vsync prevents horrible screen artifacts like tearing which is where it is caught between updating the output for the 1-2 frames so you see part of this as a slight tear in the screen as the frames overlap each other when you move quickly. If your existing graphics card can output 60FPS without vsync enabled then at some time you will see this screen tearing when you move quickly. If your graphics card can handle 60FPs with vsync enabled then obviously you do not need to upgrade but most people notice it as it is a glitch and depending on the game it can be very distracting seeing large tears in the graphics.

The 4850\4870 allow you to run with no screen tearing and usually maximum AA + AF for similar performance but obviously it is much better as now you have a perfect picture with no glitches and the ATI have superior texture compression which is why they only need 512MB Vram. Try and do a quick 360 degree pan of the environment in Assassins Creed from a rooftop on a 4850\4870 then try the same thing on a 8800 and the difference is very noticeable as the NV stutters but the ATI is very smooth and the minimum FPS is higher as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom