50 CPUs tested in Adobe Lightroom 5.3 RAW conversion

CAT-THE-FIFTH · 28 Jun 2014 at 10:39

Right,I translated what is said in the chart.

It says:

"4GiB DDR3 RAM pro speicherkanal"

Google translate says:

"4GiB DDR3 RAM memory per channel"

So that is 8GB for the socket 1155,socket 1150 and AM3+ platforms,12GB for the socket 1366 platform and 16GB for the socket 2011 platform.

413x · 28 Jun 2014 at 12:29

This chart makes me think I should go for amd fx 8350

Vertigo · 28 Jun 2014 at 12:59

I've had several AMD processors over the years and, pretty much every time, I've ended up wishing I'd gone Intel.

AMD are going a different route these days and, if you're after integrated solutions with decent on-board graphics, then they have their benefits but frankly, if it's raw processing power you're after, Intel every time.

413x · 28 Jun 2014 at 13:17

I'll be getting an Intel Haswell E I just could do with a stop gap and thought I've never tried an amd cpu at all

Luke · 28 Jun 2014 at 15:59

I've just started using lightroom so the recent upgrade from i7 920 to Xeon 1230 has been quite fortuitous!

englishpremier · 28 Jun 2014 at 17:49

My desktop is 3rd from bottom.

I swear it's much faster than the I5 in my macbook though.

Amp34 · 28 Jun 2014 at 18:37

CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
Mostly although they have some overclocked chips there.

They have a Core i5 4570T.

I didn't notice that, but I still stand by my original point. They don't seem to have any (Decent) low powered chips on that list.

The 4570T is about the slowest low power processor Intel do, it's about half the speed of the ones I mentioned according to http://www.cpubenchmark.net/

CAT-THE-FIFTH · 28 Jun 2014 at 19:03

Amp34 said:
I didn't notice that, but I still stand by my original point. They don't seem to have any (Decent) low powered chips on that list.

The 4570T is about the slowest low power processor Intel do, it's about half the speed of the ones I mentioned according to http://www.cpubenchmark.net/

Looking at the clockspeeds,I would say the Core i5 4690S should be within 10% of a Core i5 4670K:

http://ark.intel.com/products/80812/Intel-Core-i5-4690S-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_90-GHz
http://ark.intel.com/products/75047/Intel-Core-i5-4670-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_80-GHz

Amp34 · 28 Jun 2014 at 19:11

That's what I'd hope. It would have been nice to see just how that would affect the performance of Lightroom though.

mrk · 29 Jun 2014 at 00:32

Eh, 3770K @ 4.6GHz here, seems all fine

CAT-THE-FIFTH · 9 Jul 2014 at 20:22

It seems Sweclockers also has done some LR tests too:

https://translate.google.com/transl...4690k-och-pentium-g3258-anniversary-edition/8

http://i.imgur.com/4jfCuL2.png