Some random youtube video doesn't mean they're all equal.
I'm not sure why HankScorpio won't give it up. Maybe a review?
"GTX 760 can genuinely be thought of as a GTX 670/660Ti in many ways though it loses an entire SMX unit that's home to 192 processors and 16 texture units. The new GPU makes up some of the performance shortfall by clocking at a higher frequency than the 6-series parts. Illustrating this point, the peak GFLOPS throughput is only nine per cent lower than a GTX 670.
The question then arises of why Nvidia would go to the trouble of having a new GPU that's ostensibly similar, albeit slower than the GTX 670; why not rebrand current cards, change specifications just a little, and reduce the price to partners and distributors? Well, the cynical approach is to say that Nvidia has done entirely this, because the GTX 760 is not much more than a core-restricted, higher-clocked GTX 670."
etc.
The only reason the 760 was received well because it was so much cheaper than a 670.
I'm not sure why HankScorpio won't give it up. Maybe a review?
"GTX 760 can genuinely be thought of as a GTX 670/660Ti in many ways though it loses an entire SMX unit that's home to 192 processors and 16 texture units. The new GPU makes up some of the performance shortfall by clocking at a higher frequency than the 6-series parts. Illustrating this point, the peak GFLOPS throughput is only nine per cent lower than a GTX 670.
The question then arises of why Nvidia would go to the trouble of having a new GPU that's ostensibly similar, albeit slower than the GTX 670; why not rebrand current cards, change specifications just a little, and reduce the price to partners and distributors? Well, the cynical approach is to say that Nvidia has done entirely this, because the GTX 760 is not much more than a core-restricted, higher-clocked GTX 670."
etc.
The only reason the 760 was received well because it was so much cheaper than a 670.