Be sure you understand that using a block on the 670 won't improve it's overclocking ability.
These cards just like the 680's are voltage limited and not hindered by cooling.
Buying one thinking it will increase your overclocks is going to be a disapointment.
Depends. I have the reference KFA card and the standard cooler is not only loud but can't cope, even with my modest settings of +90 core and +300 memory. I don't believe i've reached the limits of my card, more so the limits of my cooler as once it hits 69 degrees it starts down clocking.
Shoving the card under water will keep it cooler, hopefully allowing me to push the clocks further.
Admittedly, yes the card will always be limited due to no voltage control but I still think you'd notice a difference.
however I hate the look of these circly EK ones, so pass on that for me
Whack the fan on 100% and test with Heaven to find your max clockspeed.
Your overclock will top out before throttling kicks in with the fan running that high.
This will let you know the limits of the card before you decide whether it's worth putting under water.
Watercooling these cards will not make them clock any higher without access to more vcore, it's already been proven with the 680's these are no different.
I can see the quieter running point of view but like I've said previously these cards are vcore limited and not held back by cooling.
Remember when its on the card in the rig you will have to look up from underneath it to even be able to see the circles.
thats not the point
why buy an EK waterblock with:
- ugly design
- possible flaking issue
- additional cost of sli bridge/only upwards ports
im questioning my loyalty to EK tbh![]()
The 670 block will be half the price of the 690 right?![]()
EK-FC Link is bundled with your FC water block for free. A 90° fitting is needed, that's true. But you also get the option to align the tubing in every angle from 0° to 180°, not just straight 90° like before.