Here's another one for you, just in case you're old enough to remember the good old days!
I have a maths degree and got 6 out of 7. I'm convinced this question:
...is complete bollards. On what planet does 4*(3/5) - 2*(1/3) make 34/15?
And then it occurred to me that the question actually meant "four and three fifths minus two and one third". So yeah. No mathematician ever writes numbers that way. In fact, I've never seen anyone write numbers that way. BBC: tripping up real mathematicians by being annoyingly ambiguous.
Here's another one for you, just in case you're old enough to remember the good old days!
6 out of 7.
Got the voltage question wrong lol.
I got 6 out of 7 but that's because I like the French system of marking which claims no one can be perfect....
i got all 8 questions right.![]()
I have a maths degree and got 6 out of 7. I'm convinced this question:
![]()
...is complete bollards. On what planet does 4*(3/5) - 2*(1/3) make 34/15?
And then it occurred to me that the question actually meant "four and three fifths minus two and one third". So yeah. No mathematician ever writes numbers that way. In fact, I've never seen anyone write numbers that way. BBC: tripping up real mathematicians by being annoyingly ambiguous.
Here's another one for you, just in case you're old enough to remember the good old days!
It's not the BBC it's how I was taught at school to do 'mixed fractions'. And I 100% agree with you that it's awful, the way it's written makes it look like it's 4 times 3/5 rather than what it means as 4 + 3/5.
Such BS. Why include simultaneous equations in O-levels and not GCSE questions? A lot of the others are also solving equations which make up a large bulk of the GCSE syllabus.
Without a dot or brackets I would always interpret it as a mixed fraction.
How else would you write a mixed fraction?
![]()
How else would you write a mixed fraction?
![]()