Associate
- Joined
- 6 May 2015
- Posts
- 296
14 Fury GPUs?All in all, a very impressive build, oh and I think kaap is waiting for those fury x2 cards to come out and using 7 of those![]()

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
14 Fury GPUs?All in all, a very impressive build, oh and I think kaap is waiting for those fury x2 cards to come out and using 7 of those![]()
He says there wasn't a PSU powerful enough to power 7 Fury X's, couldn't he have hooked up two PSU's to one system?
Them monitors are gorgeous!!![]()
Would a Nano underwater performance exactly the same as a Fury X? (assuming clock for clock)
Would a Nano underwater performance exactly the same as a Fury X? (assuming clock for clock)
Should do. Looking at where my Nano stacks up in the Firestrike bench thread, at like for like clocks it performs comparably to the Fury X's and pulls ahead when over clocked (for graphics score) compare to lower clocked Fury's
Having said that mine tops out at around 1085 Mhz as its limited compared to the amount of power its able to pull compared to the fury X, for which those seem to reach higher clock speeds.
Surprisingly the stock cooler on the Nano is actually very good and ramped up more then capable of maintaining over clocks without drops in core clock. Building a custom loop done so may be interesting to see if I can push the over clock further once there is no fan to power and what it will achieve then. Hopefully break 1100 Mhz![]()
Enjoyed watching this, that custom GPU bridge is a work of art!
I'm guessing aquacomputer didn't want to sponsor it, they have 7 slot bridges ready made
Come to think of it, I think Watercool do as well![]()
Did he say that the Nano throttles with it's stock cooler in a normal sized case?
Wasn't there a long winded argument on this forum about that?
I'm sure people were going to use them in small HTPC cases that were so small you couldn't fit a 980Ti in it but insisted they didn't or wouldn't throttle. What is the market for a card that will throttle in a case that small enough to make the Nano the best/only option?
Still, fun to see it done. Can't imagine why anyone would want to do this other than to show it can be done, which I think Linus pretty much says.
I wish they had gone into a little more detail about temperatures and stuff though. Running 7 GPUs and 2 huge Xeon CPUs on 2 x 360mm radiators (or were they 420mm?) makes me think they must've good enough but not great. I guess Nano's won't need much cooling, but those CPUs...
I'm probably more interested in the software used to run 7 VMs like that.
Mine throttles with the air cooler very slightly with the default fan profile, but the default fan profile is very quiet. Notch the fan up a bit and its fine.