I was being sarcastic about my max fps being better since you were slating skodamart about his minimums.
Cool about the sarcastic, I didn't interpret it that way though.

Btw, a 7950 with ghz bios isn't true stock vs stock. Can we get a real 7950 stock result ?![]()
It was true spixelspixel@stock vs tommybhoys HIS IceQ@stock, that's the way it came out the box, it comes with the GHz bios, I didn't touch it, OcUK description is: Core: 800MHz, but mine was a GHz version and out of the ones I've seen on here they all have the GHz bios.


I don't really care about comparisons between the 7950 + 660ti though tbh, just didn't like your reply to skodamart.
I don't normally care in the slightest either, but when someone comes on the forum, informs me that I'm an osterich:
If you ATi bunch are happy to live with your head in the sand then good luck to you.
In laymans terms telling me 'I'm a thick ****', then there comes a time I will bite back, I apologised in advance and explained the reasons of the tone of my post.
People always defend whatever card they currently own, nothing new. Both cards are in the same ballpark, that's what matters.
I'm all for defending your purchase choice, I/others explained in numerous occasion that it was a gubbed gpu and told him to enjoy his new toy, all inocent happy stuff.
However I'm 100% against a fellow forum member who goes to the lengths he did despite knowing it was down to a fault, not a working card-giving out wrong information and hell bent on his extraordinary lengths to attempt the usual bash of AMD down the driver route.
If it stops just one person purchasing a 660ti over a 7950 because he takes in that sort of nonsense, then I'm justified and job done.