9/11 - Controlled demolition?

IceBus · 3 Aug 2006 at 12:48

I'm sorry to post another one of these threads up, but theres still a real lack of conclusive evidence about what happened on 9/11 and a lack of disclosure of tapes etc. that could definitively quash any conspiracy theories.

I stumbled onto this video today and it contains a piece of footage I've never seen before, which to me, looks extremely hard to explain away.

At the 38 second mark:- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3njQAEMYh0E

For more supporting evidence:- http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php

www.martiallaw911.info/video.htm

http://netctr.com/media.html

http://www.question911.com/links.php

What do you guys think? Please try and refrain from bashing this idea on principle if you haven't watched the videos.

iBot · 3 Aug 2006 at 12:51

Godzilla did it.

With a purposeful grimace and a terrible sound
He pulls the spitting high tension wires down

Helpless people on a aero-plane
Scream bug-eyed as he looks in on them

He picks up a bus and he throws it back down
As he wades through the buildings toward the center of town

Oh no, they say hes got to go
Go go godzilla, yeah
Oh no, there goes the world trade centres
Go go godzilla, yeah

edit: The floors are buckling under the weight and kicking up dust below the "demolition" wave.

sinister_stu · 3 Aug 2006 at 12:53

Hardly compelling.

Zip · 3 Aug 2006 at 12:56

I Know what i saw live on TV and why would they do "Controlled demolition" on probably the biggest money making thing in the entire US?

kitten_caboodle · 3 Aug 2006 at 12:56

Stolly · 3 Aug 2006 at 12:56

Is it some kind of tradition to have this thread posted every 3 months ?

At least it makes a change from "MI6 killed Princess Di"

While we are on about the tinfoil hat brigade

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/02/seti_flame/

DiG · 3 Aug 2006 at 12:58

No, it was terror, simple as

sinister_stu · 3 Aug 2006 at 12:59

Zip said:
I Know what i saw live on TV and why would they do "Controlled demolition" on probably the biggest money making thing in the entire US?

Add to that the fact that if it were a controlled demolition they would have explosives on all sides of the tower and not just one.

My money would be on debris falling through stairwells or holes in the floor.

Zip · 3 Aug 2006 at 12:59

People that Fight to believe Conspiracy theorys are right **** me off lots. :mad:

They could come up with a Conspiracy theory to why i Peed on the toilet floor earlier on if they really wanted

The truth that i missed the bowl from not paying attention but even if i said that they could say im lieing and make up some more theories to why i did it :rolleyes:

IceBus · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:00

Zip said:
I Know what i saw live on TV and why would they do "Controlled demolition" on probably the biggest money making thing in the entire US?

To provoke fear among the country and make them willing to sanction an illegal war in an oil rich country to secure billions of dollars worth of oil?

Also, could the idiots who can't read the first post comprehensively enough to see the section:-

"Please try and refrain from bashing this idea on principle if you haven't watched the videos."

please go troll in another thread.

Stolly · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:02

IceBus said:
To provoke fear among the country and make them willing to sanction an illegal war in an oil rich country to secure billions of dollars worth of oil?

At a cost of hundreds of billions, where they could have bought the oil at market rate and saved a fortune.

Next theory please....

PaulStat · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:02

Just no.

Borris · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:02

kitten_caboodle said:

meggy-vengeance · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:03

Jesus let this go already, it's been in here about 2315616409458239857 times already

and it BLATANTLY wasn't a controlled demolition either.

leaskovski · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:09

Borris said:
I'm either hungry or aroused - I can't tell which.

Aroused? Dude! WTF!

Zip · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:11

IceBus said:
To provoke fear among the country and make them willing to sanction an illegal war in an oil rich country to secure billions of dollars worth of oil?

Also, could the idiots who can't read the first post comprehensively enough to see the section:-

"Please try and refrain from bashing this idea on principle if you haven't watched the videos."

please go troll in another thread.

So you want every one to come in here and agree with you and the videos? :rolleyes:

You do know OPEC is the ones that gets the oil and makes the most money and control oil prices dont you?

WillyNelson · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:14

*to the tune of Big Ben

Wrong-wrong-wrong-wrong!
Wrong-wrong-wrong-wrong!

Wrong-wrong-wrong-wrong!
Wrong-wrong-wrong-wrong!

Yer-wrong!

Yer-wrong!

Yer-wrong!

:rolleyes:

Stolly · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:15

Yes, you idiots. Stop replying to the thread. Want do you think this is ? A forum for discussions ?

IceBus · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:16

Zip said:
So you want every one to come in here and agree with you and the videos?

You do know OPEC is the ones that gets the oil and makes the most money and control oil prices dont you?

No. I want people to watch the videos and then construct a reasoned argument, something that used to be possible on these forums. Obviously now people would rather post pictures of owls saying 'O RLY' than actually try to enter into any sort of debate. The point of this thread is to watch the video footage I've cited, and go to the websites, then reply, but post with some idiotic kneejerk reaction or attempt to be funny about a subject which is deadly serious.

Where exactly would the US economy be as a whole without sources of cheap oil?

DaveyD · 3 Aug 2006 at 13:18

I really can't beleive that that would be controlled explosions, there must be a decent explanation in why those small isolated blowouts happen, it's probably just some sort of support collapsing causing massive amounts of force to be put on thing all around or whatever.

I personally disagree with any of these silly, sad theories, as so many people died tragically, and that people refuse to believe that these terrorists were capable of such a controlled devastating attack.