Thats not really the greater scheme now is it?
Did I say CT - nope, just they looked controlled, even stating I do not believe it to the a CT by the CIA etc...
I'm pretty sure it wasn't...
9/11; Never forget.
- Thread starter qqg3
- Start date
Thats not really the greater scheme now is it?
Did I say CT - nope, just they looked controlled, even stating I do not believe it to the a CT by the CIA etc...
I'm pretty sure it wasn't...
How great a scheme do you want? In terms of world history, it's basically the biggest event since the Millennium, and probably a bit longer. The impact has been massive.
ecksman said:
They don't looked controlled because - as said - controlled demolitions start at the bottom and go upwards, and are not generally preceded by plane crashes and lengthy fires.
ecksman said:
Only pretty sure?
And where did I say that 9/11 wasn't big. I said individual humans... but if you want to change my point...
It's not individual humans, though, is it. It was 3000 individual humans, and the whole of that is greater than the sum of it's parts.
So, no, one person dying is not significant on the world stage, if that is indeed what you're talking about. 3000 people isn't significant. 3000 people dying simultaneously in the largest and most dramatic terrorist event ever? Yeah, that's pretty significant.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,838
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Nobody has ever mentioned the fact that the Towers didn't need to fall down with a controlled demolition.
Just flying the drone planes into the Towers and making the passengers up was enough to start the ball rolling in Afghanistan to get their oil (yeah I know).
We all sat there for quite a while looking at the carnage Bush's drone planes had done and if they had stayed up they still would have gone to Afghanistan for the oil (yeah I know again).
The accidental collapse of the Towers was not envisaged by Bush's entourage but added the icing on the cake.
Just flying the drone planes into the Towers and making the passengers up was enough to start the ball rolling in Afghanistan to get their oil (yeah I know).
We all sat there for quite a while looking at the carnage Bush's drone planes had done and if they had stayed up they still would have gone to Afghanistan for the oil (yeah I know again).
The accidental collapse of the Towers was not envisaged by Bush's entourage but added the icing on the cake.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 8,725
- Location
- UK
I didn't say anything that implied I am some kind of expert."To me". Did I say I was an expert? Nope, but it just doesn't look right to me. Read into that what you want.
Ditto all you like
Instead, thinking critically and rationally, I've followed the investigations into the collapsed buildings, done over years, led and overseen by experts. These investigations are opposed to minority reports by fringe experts and a teenager with a video editor, no more expert than you or I.
The only thing I said with some certainty was that it wasn't controlled because the buildings collapsed from the top. This is something I know (and I am sure you do too) from various documentaries and a basic understanding of physics - if you want to collapse a tall building in a controlled manner, you start it from the bottom to create the pancake footprint.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 16 Oct 2005
- Posts
- 3,681
- Location
- Poole
