9/11

Status
Not open for further replies.
Could an amateur pilot who has only trained on single engine and twin engine planes fly a passenger jet into a building with that level of accuracy? Not one amateur pilot but three managed to achieve head on collisions. The footage of the second plane shows it only making one correcting flight adjustment before impacting. Isn't that rather too skillful for someone who hasn't flown that type of plane before?

Then there is the confirmed reports of traces of thermite being discovered in the rubble. how did it get there? Doesn't the fact that the towers both collapsed floor by floor on top of each other resemble a controlled explosion?

There is most definitely some things we are not being told.

I'll bite, moving an airliner in approximately the right direction isn't particularly hard, it's keeping it on an accurate flight path, take off, landings know to read the instruments in case if problems that take year of training. You don't really need to know this **** if you are on a crash plan.

Why would you need to even consider blowing up a building if you crashing a plane into it? :)

As for the thermite, they did do demolition work after then event.
 
Lol and the retards have joined the thread with the usual inside job CT nonsense...

It's a bit of a leap from the OP which is about having intelligence of the attacks to actually carrying out the attacks...
 
Lol and the retards have joined the thread with the usual inside job CT nonsense...

It's a bit of a leap from the OP which is about having intelligence of the attacks to actually carrying out the attacks...

Inside job? Hardly! The Americans can't even put a man on the moon how do you expect them to pull off something like this.
 
Inside job? Hardly! The Americans can't even put a man on the moon how do you expect them to pull off something like this.

Such people are going to look like idiots, within the next 16months. When someone is more than likely to win the Google Lunar X-Prize and we get HD video of one or more of the Apollo landing sites. Although I'm sure some will still dismiss the HD images of foot prints and poop bags etc.
 
Could an amateur pilot who has only trained on single engine and twin engine planes fly a passenger jet into a building with that level of accuracy?

It's not that hard to hit an extremely large building. Someone without any flight experience at all could have a good chance of landing a modern passenger jet safely with minimal instructions and that's far, far harder. flying into a huge building? Anyone could do it with some hours on a simulator and some studying of the manuals. Using a plane as a missile isn't even a new or unusual idea. In fact, it's pretty obvious for a suicide attack. Especially since it was used so famously in WW2.

Besides, a near miss would have suited their intentions well enough as long as they crashed the planes into the main part of New York.

Then there is the confirmed reports of traces of thermite being discovered in the rubble. how did it get there?
Confirmed by people who had already decided it was there. I could confirm that there were reports of traces of Klingon disruptor beams if I wanted to. All it would take would be for someone to claim they existed and me to agree with them - there's a confirmed report.

Doesn't the fact that the towers both collapsed floor by floor on top of each other resemble a controlled explosion?
No, it doesn't.

Controlled explosions don't start most of the way up a building. Or are you arguing that all of the evidence of impacts most of the way up the towers is faked? Hey, the people who faked the moon landings and the JFK assassination and Elvis' death are probably still alive. Aliens probably live longer than humans.

Controlled explosions use (radical idea coming!) explosions. Which were not noticed despite the very large amount of attention being paid by a very large number of people.

What the collapse of the towers resembles is a huge weight dropping downwards onto them. The huge weight, of course, being the floors above the floors weakened to failure by the impacts of the planes and the fires. Massive weight crashing down onto floor X causes it to collapse, which causes an even larger weight to crash down onto floor X-1, which causes it to collapse, which causes an even larger weight to crash down onto floor X-2...etc.

There is most definitely some things we are not being told.
There are most definitely some things some people are deliberately ignoring being told over and over again, but that's not the same thing.



It's frightening to acknowledge that a small number of people from a much larger group of people could use our own civilian resources and a very simple plan to inflict such massive harm on us. Particularly when we know there are other people who could do the same thing and would if they had the chance.

It's much less frightening to believe in some tremendously complex conspiracy that could only be carried out with massive resources, the most advanced technology, highly trained people and some of the most powerful people in the world.

It doesn't matter what evidence has to be ignored to hold faith in the latter - it's much less frightening.
 
Last edited:
Or are you arguing that all of the evidence of impacts most of the way up the towers is faked? Hey, the people who faked the moon landings and the JFK assassination and Elvis' death are probably still alive. Aliens probably live longer than humans.

No I was speculating not arguing that an uncontrolled explosion may cause a building to collapse like your straw man and not like a controlled demolition.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom