For gaming as always, any half decent quad(any phenom 2, anything from Q6600 upwards) is "enough" for gaming, not at stock. with a Q6600 and Phenoms really to unlimit yourself as some games have heavy single threads even if they can use multiple threads, you really want 3.2-3.4Ghz as a baseline, once you pass that theres really very very few games that you'd see a difference in.
Even more importantly most of the games that it would make a difference in, the extra performance is rather irrelevant. 25fps or 60fps in Supreme commander, its such a slow paced game, top down view, that 25fps is basically completely smooth. Most of the situations where you become cpu limited, just don't matter to performance.
Sli/xfire included, either you've moved from say a single 6950/570gtx on a single 1080p display to xfire/sli and 2-3 screens or a much higher res..... in which case that reinforces the gpu limit, or, take an fps, single 1080p screen, single gpu can get you 80fps, xfire can get you 145fps, but the cpu limits you at 130fps, you're "cpu limited" but at such a high frame rate again it doesn't matter. The main reason for xfire/sli is to get similarly good framerates at vastly higher res or settings.
Now, a 2500k will be significantly faster than a Phenom 2 in things other than gaming, they can still be a very good upgrade.
Unfortunately cost wise, Sandybridges really can't compete, £80 for a quad core AMD chip, £160 for a 2500k, they aren't twice as fast, even at their best they aren't twice as fast(couple cases they are, many they aren't even 20-30% ahead).
If you have a bit of extra money, they are faster, theres no doubt, nothing wrong with getting them, but for gaming alone I wouldn't bother at all.