9590 or 4770K?

[CAT-THE-FIFTH]

The 3820 has stuff in it that the FX's don't, so bringing it into question changes the landscape slightly more than it should.

Also, PD's AMD's third 32nm CPU's (Llano/Zambezi) , as Sandy 1155 can be considered Intels 3rd 32nm stuff, which is me trying to be as fair as I can.

Nevermind, I don't think we're going to be seeing eye to eye, as we're straying off the initial point.

The desktop FX8350 has stuff disabled too,like the extra HT links,for example when compared to the server CPUs.

Moreover,SB was the third Intel CPU made too on 32NM. The first was the Core i3 530 and the second was the Core i7 980X. Moreover,we saw with Llano how terrible it was with the very low clockspeeds for the CPU and terrible yields on the IGP. It took until early 2012 for the process node to mature enough. The delays by GF meant AMD had to launch two new CPUs on a immature node. The Core i3 530 was a pipecleaner part for Intel,as it the IGP itself was 45NM. The Core i7 980X was a larger die,but from I gather it was quite expensive probably in part for the market it served and probably yields. Ultimately AMD had to pay dearly for GF underperforming and delaying their nodes and they have done so with both 32NM and 28NM so far. AMD for its bigger cores has not much choice but to stick with them,since Intel and IBM are the only other two companies which are capable of making such large CPUs. TSMC is not an option ATM.

Anyway,I think we have strayed enough now!!

 

[Martini1991]

I think you missed the part where I said Sandy was Intels 3rd 32nm part (As was Piledriver AMD's)