No it isnt, a few of P4 CPUs in LGA775 socket are faster.
Oh yes it is,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e7/3c2e7078a9869e9d518813af2d0fa6f2837eea4d" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
420@ 3ghz = 21 seconds SPi 1m
p4@ 5ghz = 26 seconds, not all will do 5ghz though
(I have had both)
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
No it isnt, a few of P4 CPUs in LGA775 socket are faster.
A single core Celeron runs SPI 1m in 21s? I have an e2140 in a HTPC clocked at 3GHz and this does it in 22s, looking at a few review and benchmark sites they say a Celeron 420 is equal to around a P4 630 3.0GHz.
What are these chips like for temp?They seem good value for money do the new celerons.
But its the best game everI thought we'd learned to stop using SuperPi to compare chips, it doesn't really give an indication of real world performance at all.
I went from a P4 3.2 to a Q6600 and I have to admit that in everyday use I've not noticed that much of a difference but get the Q6600 video encoding/resampling and it's simply leaves the P4 for dead by a very, very long way.
My Prescott P4 3.4ghz (was one of the higher end ones) ran at 90C idle, i've given that PC to my dad
And yes, the thermal die in them obviously sucks, i laughed when it said it was 100C+ and i could touch it..
To the people saying it was a huge difference - did you just change CPU, or reinstall windows at the same time?