
KASM said:Please go away and take this rubbish with you.
Moredhel said:I like the way the "scientific panel" ignore such things as the frame rate of the security recording and the fact that the plane is moving at about 600 miles per hour.
jezsoup said:I think what KASM was trying to say was,
Yes it is interesting but this topic has been beaten to death and back on the board, please use the search function to read what we have all got to say on the topic. have a nice day
hugs cuddles and lots of kisses KASM xxxx
Or something along them lines![]()

Ex-RoNiN said:Mate, the current 757 model can carry up to 280 passengers.
Where did all these bodies come from? Very simple question.

Chronos-X said:then it disappeared above the pentagon - where did it go

Hxc said:Thats because the plane that crashed, used Pratt and Whinly engines.
Oh the factual inacuracies!
What I mean is, by the time the frame has moved from one to the next, the plane has gone past and begun to break up after hitting a sodding wall at said speed. Not to mention the fact that the CCD in the camera looks so bad that at best you'd get a faint blur even if you caught the plane full frame.Cheekykid said:![]()
Does 530(actuall speed) miles per hour make such a huge plane look so small? i doubt it
Am a seeker of truth
Cheekykid said:![]()
Does 530(actuall speed) miles per hour make such a huge plane look so small? i doubt it
Am a seeker of truth

Cheekykid said:And this comes from someone who his source of evidence come from an internet website or media![]()
Cheekykid said:How are you are all too sure that it WASN'T staged?

eLbot said:How are you sure that I'm not the huge spaghetti monster who spawned the world? I haven’t seen proof against it! Please- that argument is as weak as it always was.![]()