A plane crashed on Pentagon? Check this out

Status
Not open for further replies.
I like the way the "scientific panel" ignore such things as the frame rate of the security recording and the fact that the plane is moving at about 600 miles per hour.
 
I think what KASM was trying to say was,

Yes it is interesting but this topic has been beaten to death and back on the board, please use the search function to read what we have all got to say on the topic. have a nice day

hugs cuddles and lots of kisses KASM xxxx


Or something along them lines:)
 
KASM said:
Please go away and take this rubbish with you.

:eek:


Moredhel said:
I like the way the "scientific panel" ignore such things as the frame rate of the security recording and the fact that the plane is moving at about 600 miles per hour.

Does 530(actuall speed) miles per hour make such a huge plane look so small? i doubt it


Am a seeker of truth
 
jezsoup said:
I think what KASM was trying to say was,

Yes it is interesting but this topic has been beaten to death and back on the board, please use the search function to read what we have all got to say on the topic. have a nice day

hugs cuddles and lots of kisses KASM xxxx


Or something along them lines:)

Of course I was :D
 
Bet you believe that Loose Change rubbish as well!

"No Rolls Royce engines were found at the pentagon" (from Loose Change)

Thats because the plane that crashed, used Pratt and Whinly engines.

Oh the factual inacuracies!
 
Ex-RoNiN said:
Mate, the current 757 model can carry up to 280 passengers.

Where did all these bodies come from? Very simple question.

Indeed. We know everyone got on the plane, we know the plane was being monitored by traffic control, then it disappeared above the pentagon - where did it go :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
 
I’m all for alternative theories and discussion of ideas on events if done politely and with respect. A society that doesn’t question what is placed in front of it is one I’d hate to see. But seriously; I’ve had enough of this 9/11 tripe. Is a thread with a link and a smiley face really the best you can give us?

A forum isn’t a link repository. If you are going to push this in our faces the least you could do is try to explain why you believe it or your feelings on the day or something constructive. More to the point this has been done time and time again. Please use the search bar when starting a new topic to ensure it isn’t a repeat for the n’th time. A search of “Pentagon” yields 6 similar results.

EDIT: “A seeker of truth” well then can I suggest you start with the independent commission report? Instead of reading a webpage and deciding to take it’s poorly displayed argument against a handful of eyewitnesses; one of whom was a member of these fine forums. Let me guess though; he was paid off and/or a member of the cia here to trick us?

The most wonderful and thing about the web is anyone can create content and put forth ideas. Which is also its weakness, over imaginative minds spawning millions of pages of mis-information.


Chronos-X said:
then it disappeared above the pentagon - where did it go

Aliens did it! :eek:
 
Hxc said:
Thats because the plane that crashed, used Pratt and Whinly engines.

Oh the factual inacuracies!


And this comes from someone who his source of evidence come from an internet website or media :rolleyes:


How are you are all too sure that it WASN'T staged? that's equally naive than believe that it was 100% Osamas job. Am not sure about anything and yet you seem to be, like you got 100% accurate sources
 
the tv program that clearly showed the engine remains, and wheel remains and general plane remains kinda blows this theory way out of the water
 
Cheekykid said:
:eek:




Does 530(actuall speed) miles per hour make such a huge plane look so small? i doubt it


Am a seeker of truth
What I mean is, by the time the frame has moved from one to the next, the plane has gone past and begun to break up after hitting a sodding wall at said speed. Not to mention the fact that the CCD in the camera looks so bad that at best you'd get a faint blur even if you caught the plane full frame.
 
Cheekykid said:
:eek:




Does 530(actuall speed) miles per hour make such a huge plane look so small? i doubt it


Am a seeker of truth

I don't think you appreciate how big the Pentagon actually is.
 
Please do a search of the forums, this topic has been gone over about a hundred times in (at times) massive detail :)

Basically a lot of the conspiracy theory sites rely on selectively ignoring information, the engines being a classic example - most aircraft have multiple engine options over the life of the aircraft (either due to improvements or cost savings), even the same models of aircraft within a single airlines fleet may have different engines (I think in some cases it can even happen on a single aircraft).
 
Cheekykid said:
And this comes from someone who his source of evidence come from an internet website or media :rolleyes:

Sorry I couldn't sit by for the irony of this one. Sorry where is your source of information? Oh yes that's right an internet website! :o


Cheekykid said:
How are you are all too sure that it WASN'T staged?

How are you sure that I'm not the huge spaghetti monster who spawned the world? I haven’t seen proof against it! Please- that argument is as weak as it always was. :(
 
eLbot said:
How are you sure that I'm not the huge spaghetti monster who spawned the world? I haven’t seen proof against it! Please- that argument is as weak as it always was. :(

Ain't weak at all and i stand by that :mad:
Nobody knows the truth. We just know bits and peices.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom