A plane crashed on Pentagon? Check this out
- Thread starter Cheekykid
- Start date
- Status
You just shot yourself in the foot. Well done.Cheekykid said:
Just because the US govenment told a fair number of half-truths and quite possibly the odd downright lie doesn't equate to them deliberately setting out to kill thousands of their own citizens.
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 2,667
- Location
- In a wheelie bin
Cheekykid said:
I dont even see a plane in the first video, so i fail to see how they can say that it wasn't a 757.
Also think of the innocent people that died on the flights, there relatives deserve to be able to mourn their loss in peace and not have people digging this rubbish up all the time.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,778
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Cheekyvid - watch this and watch the rest of the videos.
These are the guys that wrote Loose Change being torn apart.
In fact its quite embarassing.
These are the guys that wrote Loose Change being torn apart.
In fact its quite embarassing.
eLbot - re your mention of the eyewitness on this forum - I take it you mean Harley? BS was called on him so unfortunately he's not a reliable witness. I think he was standing in Arlington cemetery watching the plane hit, on the way back from meeting Michael Jackson and recording a hit single with him.
Don't get me wrong, I side with you completely and the conspiracy theorists are just cowering with their tinfoil hats blaming the government. The plane did hit The Pentagon, I can't really be bothered debunking each and every point at the moment as others are doing it now and loads of others have done it before.
Al
Don't get me wrong, I side with you completely and the conspiracy theorists are just cowering with their tinfoil hats blaming the government. The plane did hit The Pentagon, I can't really be bothered debunking each and every point at the moment as others are doing it now and loads of others have done it before.
Al
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 31 Jan 2004
- Posts
- 16,338
- Location
- Plymouth
They deserve you to shut the **** up.Cheekykid said:
Why would the US government choose to fly 2 planes into the world trade centre AND demolish it with explosives. But choose not to use a plane for the Pentagon and instead go for a cruise missile 
And is it even possible that a cruise missile or any missile at all wouldn't detonate on impact but actually punch a hole through the building and carry on finishing with the hole in C-wing?
And is it even possible that a cruise missile or any missile at all wouldn't detonate on impact but actually punch a hole through the building and carry on finishing with the hole in C-wing?
Last edited:
Jet said:Why would the US government choose to fly 2 planes into the world trade centre AND demolish it with explosives. But choose not to use a plane for the Pentagon and instead go for a cruise missile
And is it even possible that a cruise missile or any missile at all wouldn't detonate on impact but actually punch a hole through the building and carry on finishing with the hole in C-wing?
Conventional missiles don't explode on impact, they explode just before. They certainly won't punch a hole in anything unless they're designed to.
Unless it's a bunker-buster, which is designed exactly to punch holes in things. But only from above, not from the side.
Oh and I fully agree with:
Beansprout said:
Cheekykid - there are much better forums out there to post on if you're interested in this stuff. You won't get much joy here, trust me. I tend not to even read these threads anymore because I know how they go.....I don't know why I clicked on this one 
- Status