Soldato
- Joined
- 16 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 7,004
- Location
- Thessaloniki
wrong thread, delete
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
zytok said:there any official type comment re these - dons?
IamMed said:A64 3200 - 2ghz 512kb cache
A54 4000 - 2.4ghz 1024kb cache
20% extra clock speed and 100% more cache
zytok said:so can I reasonably expect 25-30% fps increases or does it not really work like that?
What was the CPU scores?zytok said:ok, after mulling over whether to keep this or not, finally took the plunge and fitted it. 3dMark2005 score on the 3200 8391. Score on the 4000 8800-ish. WTF!?!? That's barely 5%. Sonmething can't be right can it?
Angilion said:The 4000s are the old Clawhammer core, which is probably why the core isn't mentioned any more (they were initially wrongly described as being San Diego core).
Fop said:Hmm... that really should be mentioned then if that is the case, as they wouldn't have SSE3.
Edit- although they've added San Deigo to the OEM 4000 now, so I guess they are.