Abandoned Seafarers

Caporegime
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
25,275
Stumbled upon this earlier today, it is superfascinating. It was triggered by the news that the crew on the ship that hit the Balitmore bridge are still on board because they do not have the right paperwork to disembark the ship! Turns out "abandoned seafarers" is a super common phenomena.

Anyway, the website:

And what you can discover as an example:

Do a quick scan and you can read all the email correspondence talking about getting these lads paid - at one point the crew had been on board for over 2 years!

Seems right up the street of some of our resident nerds......you know who you are.
 
Seems right up the street of some of our resident nerds......you know who you are.

Have heard of it before, part of the problem is some of these ships are owned via holding companies owned by random investor groups etc.. and I guess if there's a big issue with the ship then maybe some of them prefer to walk away.

This guy spent 4 years on one:
 
That is strange. I was watching one of the airport series. This one was in Ireland.

The guy trying to enter didn't have a passport. But had a special card that seaman carry around to be admitted into a country to reach their ship.

A seafarers identity document (SID).
 
still on board because they do not have the right paperwork to disembark the ship!
think that's because the fbi are collecting evidence, + ship needs to be maintained before/if they move it,
they're used to being at sea anyway - fbi apparently confiscated all crews mobiles for evidence too - the horror.
 
I work at sea. Luckily for a company where we still have some rights (Not many of those left - see P&O Ferries debacle the other year for an example).

Abandonment is not a new phenomenon and something that has been going on forever. Seafarers these days are generally from less developed (for want of a better phrase) countries and employed via a web of various shady holding companies located in all manner of dodgy countries. The minimum international standards for seafarers working conditions are significantly below what most in the West would consider acceptable and a lot of these people are ripe for exploitation for fear of being blacklisted. Ultimately though the conditions they work under are a big part of why we can get cheap goods and in the end nobody really cares. So on it goes.
 
As I understand it, they weren't exactly stuck. They could have left at any time but then they would have forfeited wages etc.
Yeah reading a few on that website I linked in OP, a bunch seem to be about unpaid wages - the crew then "arrest" the ship(?) and then sometimes are given permission to dispose of the asset to cover their wages. Mental industry.
 
nothing physical can be stopping them leaving surely? they must have life boats, jump in the water and demand rescue.

why do these people not leave the ship? especially if its in a harbour.

jump in the water, they have to rescue you?

What was the crew abandoned for 2 years eating and drinking?
 
Last edited:
nothing physical can be stopping them leaving surely? they must have life boats, jump in the water and demand rescue.

why do these people not leave the ship? especially if its in a harbour.

jump in the water, they have to rescue you?

What was the crew abandoned for 2 years eating and drinking?
They were being supported by the local Seafarers Mission here in Aberdeen.
 
nothing physical can be stopping them leaving surely? they must have life boats, jump in the water and demand rescue.

why do these people not leave the ship? especially if its in a harbour.

jump in the water, they have to rescue you?

What was the crew abandoned for 2 years eating and drinking?

They're in a foreign country. Often with no money but owed significant amounts of back pay. Little to no documentation.
 
They're in a foreign country. Often with no money but owed significant amounts of back pay. Little to no documentation.
So they are scarred of not being paid backpay and losing their jobs if they don't stick with the ship?

sounds kinda like slavery
 
Last edited:
So they are scarred of not being paid backpay and losing their jobs if they don't stick with the ship?

sounds kinda like slavery

Sounds like sound financial sense. Also most ports are secure places owing to ISPS regulations. Larger ports also typically have a border control and police presence on site. Both tend to frown upon people randomly trying to break out of the port.
 
Sounds like sound financial sense. Also most ports are secure places owing to ISPS regulations. Larger ports also typically have a border control and police presence on site. Both tend to frown upon people randomly trying to break out of the port.

Someone tell the Tories, so they can dismantle that too :cry:

Do crew get paid for time when ships can't move, for reasons like the Baltimore thing?
 
There was a shipping company went bust a few years ago and one of their ships was impounded in Aberdeen harbour for unpaid harbour fees. The crew were stuck onboard (think they were Indian) for over a year.


Yeah, there was something like this on the Tyne a few years back and people were bringing the crew food.


Think there might have been a more recent one too.
 
Back
Top Bottom