Acer AL1916WS 19" Widescreen LCD Monitor - Black/Silver

Associate
Joined
10 Apr 2006
Posts
1,084
Location
Leicester
Thinking of getting this monitor for use with the following spec

Athlon 64 x2 3800
2x1gb geil value
asus a8m rvp
x1800xt

anybody got this monitor and if yes is it good? It will be used for gaming, video editing, movies, TV and encoding..... The only reason i ask this is because this monitor is widescreen, and so not too sure about how it works with games and stuff....

thanks
 
BF2 does not support it if I recall. Its a nice monitor but for gaming I would go for a standard 19inch, looks bigger too me.
 
theres a 5 pages thread on this monitor. and yes it does work on BF2 (and every other game ive tried) and yes, it does look bigger than a normal 19" screen
 
wicked thanks for this guys, i mainly only play ut2004, and quake, hitman, doom3 (but thats being phased out!)

better go and find that thread then......
 
geeza said:
what are the gains of dvi? does it make it clearer or something?

from the sticky ;)


Q. Does DVI make a difference?

A. This depends very much on the panel in question. Some users of some panels say that switching between VGA and DVI makes NO difference on their screens. Notably users of the Samsung range (171T, 181T, 172X) have said it makes little or no difference, and has even been tested by users with 2 side by side. Other users of different panels swear it DOES make a difference. For example, I have personally seen the LG1710B in action in both modes, and the DVI was noticeably better quality and much sharper than the VGA. However the DVI connection on the LG I would rate as comparable to the VGA on some TFT’s without DVI at all, including the AOC LM720a. It seems logical that perhaps some manufacturers who build their screens without DVI spend more time perfecting the VGA connection as that is all they offer. Whereas companies who supply both connections sensibly would expect their users to use the DVI connection, as it is there, and so sacrifice quality of the VGA as the DVI can show off the full potential of their panel. Therefore screens without DVI tend to have a better VGA than those with DVI and in some cases a good VGA connection can be comparable in quality to a DVI connection.

Quality of the VGA connection is also related to the GFX card used. Most modern GFX cards have a good VGA output and this is important in image quality of the TFT. NVidia cards have been said to have a slightly better VGA output than the ATI cards, but as said, most new cards will give u a good quality output. Good output combined with a good VGA input on the screen will give u a good quality picture.

One other thing to note is that when using DVI connection, most TFT's lose the option of some of the on screen settings like contrast and brightness, so if u use DVI and u cant change them, some people have found the screens too bright. Software fixes are available for this though (inc Powerstrip etc)

RILOT: "I have non DVI TFT’s and the picture quality is exactly the same as my friends Samsung TFT that does have DVI. We tested them both together. Oddly though, when using the Samsung with VGA input the image quality was significantly worse......If you have a card with a decent 2d quality output it shouldn't make any difference whatsoever."
 
Got my Acer today - no dead pixels or backlight bleeding and all round pretty amazing, thoroughly impressed for the price (paid £179 inc express delivery). Image on 360 (or at least on FIFA World Cup 2006) doesn't appear as clear as on my old Samsung, but that's probably down to the display being larger; I'll try more of my games later.
 
Marmotta said:
Got my Acer today - no dead pixels or backlight bleeding and all round pretty amazing, thoroughly impressed for the price (paid £179 inc express delivery). Image on 360 (or at least on FIFA World Cup 2006) doesn't appear as clear as on my old Samsung, but that's probably down to the display being larger; I'll try more of my games later.

Have you got the resolution set correctly?
 
Back
Top Bottom