I understand that completely... but at the same time... 3-4 users who have never had server based storage with redundant storage are never going to notice this "right" as they have effectively never had it... They will unlikely have to deal with down time - as XP is a very stable and secure OS (sharing a lot of the features of Server 2k3).aix0 said:Once clients become accustomed to having uninterrupted access to their private and shared data, it becomes a right, it's going to be difficult to justify any kind of down time, regardless of the organisations size. Therefore, XP offering any kind of service from a business perspective becomes inadequate.
Will continue this justification of server OS over client OS as soon as I reach sobriety... lol.
In a business of 3-4 users, it makes a lot more sense to use the spare XP box they have (and I'm *assuming* that it's XP Pro) as a file server. This makes more economic sense than spending - what - £400ish on SBS 2003? For a small business - that's a lot of money when they already have a machine in place which will do the job adequately.
This entirely depends, of course, on whether the OP needs an Exchange system...
EDIT: Although saying that... I've just found SBS for < £100!!!!

Last edited: