Hey ironfistx, the
Asus P5KC Combo Intel P35 and the
Gigabyte GA-P35C-DS3R both have 4x DDR2 slots and 2x DDR3 slots as you have mentioned. I myself haven't heard of any problems with these boards holding back memory or with 4GB of memory or more installed in them. If someone would like to clarify this, that would be greatly appreciated. One of the top P35 Chipset boards is the
Abit IP35 Pro, i have heard a number of great reviews on this particular board and from what i can gather, a number of user’s that have purchased this board are extremely happy with it.
The only advantage I can see with the X38 chipset motherboards is the PCI-Express 2.0 however, I believe their is little performance gain from it at the moment and will take a while before it becomes the standard just like DDR3 memory. The overclocking ability is very similar to that off the P35 based boards.
The
OCZ 4GB (2 x 2GB) PC2-6400C5 Dual Channel Vista Gold Series DDR2 is great memory for the price it is currently selling for, it is well worth buying.
Now as for Microsoft Windows Vista, When Windows Vista was first released sure their were a few problems with compatibility, however, this has now changed and the support for Windows Vista is now excellent. The majority of the manufacturers out their have now released 64-bit drivers for their hardware and as regards to software, once again, the majority of software now work perfectly fine under Windows Vista. Their have also been a few problems within Windows Vista but the majority of these are now fixed thanks to the Performance and Reliability packs that Microsoft have been releasing along with other updates. Now their are still a few problems around for example, slow transfer rates across networks, from one folder to another but this seems to be only affecting a few people and not the whole user base that is using Windows Vista. Though I believe this is set to be fully fixed in Service Pack 1 (Fiji) which is due out in the first quarter of next year. This certainly isn't affecting me and I think the same goes for a lot of people as well.
Now as far as game performance goes, in my opinion, it is now exactly the same as Windows XP, I notice no slowdowns what so ever. Now I understand that some people are still having a few problems but I believe these are very far and few between these days and I feel that some people tend to over exaggerate things a tad. Though please take into account this is under DirectX 9. Regarding DirectX 10 performance, going on most of the responses from others, it currently isn't up to scratch and is actually better to run it under DirectX 9. Now in my opinion this has nothing to do with Vista and DirectX 10 itself. DirectX 10 is implemented just fine and it is the hardware that needs to catch up a bit. If people disagree with me on this, please post and state your reason. I would be generally interested on your view regarding this. I think their is a lot more to DirectX 10 then some people think.
If you are deciding on Windows Vista then you may be interested in
this thread.
Hey dmx07, as regards to your question. It is not so much the fact that 2X 2GB memory kits don’t overclock but it is more due to the fact that most of the 2X 2GB kits out their have a high cas latency and there is very little room to improve this from an overclocking perspective. This is not to say that none of the 2X 2GB kits are all like this but the majority are.