AHCI vs NVMe

P4Clock · 13 Apr 2016 at 17:44

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/sams...state-drive-mzhpv256hdgl-00000-hd-207-sa.html
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/sams...state-drive-mzvlv256hchp-00000-hd-221-sa.html

other than read and wright speeds is there any real difference's? like changes in tech, interface connection type,

P4Clock · 14 Apr 2016 at 01:08

would both drives work a a boot drive?

TheMadDutchDude · 14 Apr 2016 at 03:07

Both would work as a boot device.

AHCI is old and outdated. NVMe is the way to go.

The PM is the wrong drive to choose, look at the SM951.

Take a close look at its IOPS, and you'll see what the difference is.

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/sams...state-drive-mzvpv256hdgl-00000-hd-213-sa.html

TwsT · 14 Apr 2016 at 09:21

NVMe is going to take over form AHCI like AHCI did from IDE some NVMe won't benefit from being boot drives but the sm951 is perfectly fine. Intel pci 750 series works better as a storage drive than as an os/boot drive.

Tute · 14 Apr 2016 at 09:49

You should buy NVMe where possible.

P4Clock · 14 Apr 2016 at 12:41

TwsT said:
NVMe is going to take over form AHCI like AHCI did from IDE some NVMe won't benefit from being boot drives but the sm951 is perfectly fine. Intel pci 750 series works better as a storage drive than as an os/boot drive.

wanting at as a boot drive as its less cables to mess with and the price is very nice too.

Tute said:
You should buy NVMe where possible.

then i will do.

Thank guys